How To Tell what A Khazar Jew Looks Like: its Their Nose ☺

Freddy Krueger is Jewish and has a Khazar Nose, Clips: A Nightmare On Elm Street, The Dream Master, The Dream Child, Freddy's Dead, New Nightmare and Freddy vs. Jason.


It turned out pretty good, hope you will like it!! :) My goal was to show the relationship between Freddy and the girls (Nancy, Alice, Lori etc.) and I think the song kinda fits, I became obsessed with The Pretty Reckless anyway, so I had to use this song! lol

Freddy Krueger - He Loves You- YouTube

Views: 74

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You are aware that Arab noses are significantly hooked and are an ethnic fascial feature... even more pronounced than most Jews.

 I all ready know a lot of Arabic's are Jewish, I promise I will not tell anyone ...:)

I think someone should look at all the pictures of Arab leaders and look for the hook. I spent 8 month in Iraq and 7 months in Jordan. I saw as many hooked noses there as in Italy and France and many more white English hooks at Heathrow Airport. 

Do they still pick their nose and eat their boogers...:)-

That's what phony hooked nose Jews do and stuff the Scheckel's in their nose as for safe keeping.

Come on, I am serous about this new exposed video: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/john-f-kennedy-report-how-...

It is rhetoric like yours that give the teaparty and other conservative groups a bad name... Keep your bigoted comments to yourself and focus on the material facts.

Yes I do hate the Khazar, get over it....:)

Try to express your anger and dislike for others, including the Khazar, in a professional and dignified manner... You are more capable and better than lowering yourself by using bigoted comments... to express your displeasure with others.

Trump Hating Madonna Sings About ‘Assassination’ in Front of Her Kids

Madonna sings about assassination in front of her children

 The Trump-hating singer changed the lyrics to her song “Holiday” and sang about assassination in front of her four kids.

It wasn’t too long ago that Madonna was boasting about blowing up the White House.

Thegatewaypundit.com reports: Everything she has said about the President Trump like “blowing up the White House” coupled with apparently the buzzword of the week since Joe Biden mentioned it, is just strange.

https://newspunch.com/trump-hating-madonna-sings-assassination-fron...

Time for the Secret Service to enforce the law... verbal threats, and incitement aimed at the President are criminal acts... prosecute the witch.  By the way, she looks more and more like the wicked witch of the West in the classic film... The Wizard of Oz.

And just when you though the Khazar were dead...:)

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service