By Martin Fisher, CAN news correspondent. A homosexual Facebook page has claimed victory after a Christian bridal shop in Bloomsburg, PA was forced to shut down.

 Owners of W.W. Bridal Boutique closed its doors at the end of March, claiming it could no longer safely stay in business after it received numerous threats that its owners would be killed, their children raped and their business burned to the ground.

 Threats against the bridal shop began in July of 2017 after a lesbian couple was denied service. Lisa Boucher, a co-owner of the store, told CAN that it refused service to the lesbian couple because it holds Christian beliefs defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

 The lesbian couple, Shannon Kennedy and Julie Samanas, immediately sought publicity after they were denied service, which resulted in various threats being directed at the shop's owners and family members.

 An opposition Facebook page was also created following the incident, which was dedicated to forcing the bridal shop out of business.

Calling itself “Boycott W.W. Bridal Boutique,” the page was launched on July 24, 2017 and had 269 followers when it announced victory over the bridal shop.

“I wanted o congratulate you on the successes we’ve made since the inception of this page. WW. Bridal Boutique is closing its doors,” the administrator wrote. With this congratulation, the administrator announced that the “page has run its course” and would also be shutting down.

 Martin Mawyer, president of Christian Action Network, took issue with the group’s assertion that it had anything to do with closing the Christian-owned bridal shop.

“To say that a homosexual boycott was responsible for closing W.W. Bridal Boutique is insincere and ridiculous,” Mawyer said. “This Christian bridal shop had never relied on a single dime from the homosexual community to stay in business.”

“The only way this Facebook page could have been responsible for its closure is if it was behind the depraved threats of rape, murder and arson that this bridal shop received,” Mawyer added. “And this is something the administrator of this farcical page is unwilling to admit to.”

“What closed this shop was hateful intimidation and cowardly threats,” Mawyer said, “not a minuscule group of boycotting homosexual sympathizers, most of whom live hundreds, if not thousands of miles away from Bloomsburg, PA, and most of whom had no wedding plans to begin with,” Mawyer said.

Views: 20

Reply to This



Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

( – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service