Unfortunately, the brain doesn’t forget the damage done from using crack. Long-term effects on the brain may include:
Crack, as an excitotoxic stimulant, is capable of killing brain cells and can cause persistent changes to various neural pathways. Crack can cause seizures – even in first-time users.
Crack’s intense circulatory system influence can precipitate strokes, which can create even more irreversible brain damage. The risk of a brain aneurysm (abnormal dilation of a blood vessel) also increases, which can lead to a deadly brain hemorrhage.
I have asked professional people who are friends, they work in critical care. They said the seizure looks like an epileptic seizure. Let me clarify, they did not say it was, they said it looks like.
She definitely did not watch "this is your brain on drugs" commercial. I believe her brain went into "wait for a reboot" mode. The questioner may have asked a question that required a yes or no answer.
Imagine if putin called her to demand a USA surrender ?
Absentee ballots have been thrown out as witnessed in the past, just as Ronald A. Nelson said.
Some if not all of the machines have been corrupted and default to the democrat line.
Regardless, we need to be watchful, participate in the process, those who are able could apply to be at the polls on election day. It is a long, day with little relief but worth it.
For those who can not spend the day, perhaps they could team up with others to hang around the polling sites to observe. They could also use their cell phones to record suspicious behaviors/parties.
I have jokingly said we should invest in magnetic signs to be applied to vehicles with an INS, ICE or Border Patrol looking emblem. Also stand outside the polling places with a clipboard and someone taking pictures of those entering that look suspicious. If the Democrats can use the Black Panthers to drive away votes, we can use clipboards that look official.
We should also be watchful of vans and bus loads of people who appear to be foreign born. Someone could follow those groups in and record the interaction with the officials/volunteers to see if bogus names appear to be used, etc.
They have tried many of the things suggested... but on can not loiter around a polling place 100 feet... can't take pictures or hinder voters in any way... subject to arrest. They .. both parties have it fairly well rigged to make it impossible to monitor if they get nasty... Remember the example and know that the local authorities are normally in on such shenanigans... with the aid of local law enforcement.
I recall one precinct in Florida actually had the authorized poll watchers removed by force... they were escorted off the premises by the local police. They filed suite at their own cost and any defense for being arrested was also at their own expense... making it not only expensive but embarrassing ... explaining why one is arrested.
remember when the Black Panthers stood at the door and wouldn't allow Rebulicans to enter and vote ? I do ..........
Yes ,but add tee shirts with "Polling Watch Official" in large letters on it - use a dark shirt color like Navy or Emerald green - large white plain letters ! That is the best effective way not to get harassed about being a watcher and the clip board too of course.
Dress the part. Regular flat heel black shoes.
You could call the election office and tell them that two watchers will be there in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY. They cannot tell you not to be or you can charge them with election interference or fraud right there ! Sound authoritative on the phone. You are INFORMING THEM OF IT, not asking "permission "
Originally there were always official vote watchers at every counting place and they were there all day long until the votes left the voting booth, box or machine and then they went with the votes wherever they were taken and counted - they never let the votes out of their sight - it was a requirement - - don't know when or why that was halted. I remember them well as a child. IT was considered - and voting was considered - as a much more serious thing then it seems to be now ! One watcher Dem and one Repub usually. And when they take out the unit that holds the electronic votes in a machine you watch their hands carefully as to NOT touch ANY components of that unit. make no mistake about it - this is a very tedious job all day long and into the night until the counting was completed - sometimes there were shifts to do it. 4-5 hours each team.
If anyone ever saw a machine or a mis-count or any type of activity around the vote area, they would not just let it go like they do now = they would bring them up on charges immediately and cops would be called at any impropriety at all to do with the voting !
Today they see their votes changed before their eyes by the machine and they only complain about it - they do not make a Federal case out of it as they use to ! Votes USE TO BE GUARDED LIKE FORT KNOX !
I remember how the votes had to have 4 witnessed to be transported from the vote holding machine box or wherever the votes were and placed in a lock box and 4 people guarded it 24/7 until they were fully counted, recorded, and accounted for - voting use to be a much more serious thing then it is now ! A person would be sitting AT the back of the voting booth or machine to make sure no one touched anything or got near the area !
THAT IS HOW IT USE TO BE.
Now some places have actually been seen to open the back of voting machines and a person take out votes or diddle with the machine's insides, and do something to the votes taken out or the machine insides - and no one did a thing about it ! THAT is how it is today ! Votes no longer get the respect they use to !
THAT is how lax and complacent the masses have been made to be ! No one questions anything anymore - our will has been broken and burned out of us.
I've watched the changes in people for over 70 years !
Americans are NOT the same people they use to be ! They have been morphed into what the Communist want them to be. Obedient service pets.
You could also take a picture of your vote before pulling the lever.
Sorry but it looks edited to me. How do we know it wasn't?
I still say she looks like she had too much to drink, as usual.