Although Hillary Clinton and her allies may be claiming that her private e-mail system is no big deal, Hillary’s State Department actually forced the 2012 resignation of the U.S. ambassador to Kenya in part for setting up an unsanctioned private e-mail system. According to a 2012 report from the State Department’s inspector general, former U.S. ambassador to Kenya Scott Gration set up a private e-mail system for his office in 2011.
The inspector general’s report offered a scathing assessment of Gration’s information security practices — practices that are eerily similar to those undertaken by Clinton while she served as Secretary of State:
Very soon after the Ambassador’s arrival in May 2011, he broadcast his lack of confidence in the information management staff. Because the information management office could not change the Department’s policy for handling Sensitive But Unclassified material, he assumed charge of the mission’s information management operations. He ordered a commercial Internet connection installed in his embassy office bathroom so he could work there on a laptop not connected to the Department email system. He drafted and distributed a mission policy authorizing himself and other mission personnel to use commercial email for daily communication of official government business. During the inspection, the Ambassador continued to use commercial email for official government business. The Department email system provides automatic security, record-keeping, and backup functions as required. The Ambassador’s requirements for use of commercial email in the office and his flouting of direct instructions to adhere to Department policy have placed the information management staff in a conundrum: balancing the desire to be responsive to their mission leader and the need to adhere to Department regulations and government information security standards. The Ambassador compounded the problem on several occasions by publicly berating members of the staff, attacking them personally, loudly questioning their competence, and threatening career-ending disciplinary actions. These actions have sapped the resources and morale of a busy and understaffed information management staff as it supports the largest embassy in sub-Saharan Africa.
The inspector general’s report specifically noted that Gration violated State Department policy by using a private, unsanctioned e-mail service for official business. In its executive summary listing its key judgments against the U.S. ambassador to Kenya who served under Hillary Clinton, the inspector general stated that Gration’s decision to willfully violate departmental information security policies highlighted Gration’s “reluctance to accept clear-cut U.S. Government decisions.” The report claimed that this reluctance to obey governmental security policies was the former ambassador’s “greatest weakness.”
Criticisms of Gration came from both sides of the political aisle. Liberal commentators took him to task for jeopardizing American security by insisting on the use of a private e-mail system. A 2012 dispatch from The New Republic about Gration’s resignation specifically noted that Gration’s e-mail gambit “put classified information about the U.S.’s operations in East Africa at a higher risk for exposure”:
Over the objections of State Department officials, Gration insisted on doing business on his personal laptop and through his Gmail account, according to the former officer. This put classified information about the U.S.’s operations in East Africa at a higher risk for exposure—consider an incident in June 2011, when hackers in China broke into numerous Gmail accounts belonging to senior U.S. officials. (China, for what it’s worth, has an enormous presence in East Africa.)
In a report filed shortly after his resignation, the Washington Post also recounted Gration’s myriad security violations as U.S. ambassador, noting that Gration had “repeatedly violated diplomatic security protocols at the embassy by using unsecured Internet connections.”
well done (as always) Col. Nelson,
they have become, or have always been the Royal Rulers of the Public,
and yet, they call themselves Public Servants to masquerade the truth.
helpful tip for Lawyers;
if/when you loose your license, your only option is down, into the gutter of "Public Service"
which doesn't pay as much in visible income, but you can't be fired, and it's difficult, if not impossible to be removed from office, short of felony convictions,
or as corrupt, lying, egotistical, narcissistic, backstabbing, perverted elected officials call it,
"THE JACKPOT / THE GOLD MINE".
Hey, anybody hear about "Reverend" Wright's Daughter? She is where he ought to be, in Jail, for stealing large amounts of money. Such nice upstanding people................
Let's see... if Iran and Iraq have merged we now have fulfilled Biblical Prophecy... Persia is now back as a nation.
I have said for years Hillary is Obama in a dress. what a hypocrite. She will go overboard to berate others yet its ok for her to do the same. Just another liar.
It all started in the early 60's. The flower child ( have you seen Hill's picture ) that have grown up to take us down. Remember the school SIT - INS and the protests. Bill Aryers does. Ahaaa the 60's free love all the pot you could get, the rich kids having their LSD parties. I still remember the guy who thought he was Superman and tried to stop a train and didn't quite make it.
Now how they who survived "rule " over us straight guys.
It makes me wonder if the late US Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, also used his personal e-mail account on occasion. Chris might have e-mailed or tweeted, "Somebody get me out of here! Hillary intentionally weakened my security detail outside, and now the whole compound is surrounded by Libyan rebels. All because I was reluctant to go along with her scheme to send arms to Syrian rebels via Turkey!". If Chris was belligerent enough, Hillary might get aggravated enough to simply have Chris eliminated, rather than have him just resign.
This also helps to explain the "stand down" orders. If the US military forces would have responded, and driven-away the Libyan rebels before the Compound was burned down, and before Chris died, they would have secured everything inside the Compound, including the computers. The computers might have shown unauthorized and incriminating e-mails.