Hamas-CAIR Leader Calls For Overthrow Of U.S. Government!

In the recent past I shared the following video by anonymous with you regarding one of the greatest threats we face in America today-You Decide:

Video: Anonymous - WAKE UP AMERICA they are COMING! - "Donald Trump"!-Posted on YouTube.com-By Anonymous Updates-On November 11, 2016:
 
 
This evening I wanted to share the following recent article that reveals that the Hamas-The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) leader recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. Government. What’s wrong with this picture?-You Decide:

Email Template
 
Hamas-CAIR Leader Calls For Overthrow Of U.S. Government!-Posted on Freedom Outpost-By Pamela Geller-On November 13, 2016:
 
 
The following articles from the recent past, along with a recent article relate to and/or further support the above article and video-You Decide:

CAIR Imagery Makes Obstructionist Goal Clear!-Posted ITP News-On January 12, 2011:

Federal judge confirms CAIR is Hamas: ‘Unsealed ruling reveals 'ample evidence' tying group to terror’-Posted on WND.com-On November 23, 2010:
 
rome-will-be-conquered-1-1
Muslim Crowds Shout ‘Allahu Akbar’ And Declare To Italians- ‘Build Us Mosques Or We Will Take Over The Vatican!’-Posted on Freedom Outpost-By Walid Shoebat-On November 13, 2016:
 
 
I believe that the above video and articles relate to and/or further support my following blog-You Decide:

What are CAIRs obstructionist goals?
 
 
God Bless Our Country/Republic.
Semper Fi!
Jake

Views: 878

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Go ahead BOZOS try and take over our country, 99% of Americans own guns and we will fight to keep our nation just as it is,the Muslims think they are going to force us to do what they say, We The People will never give up our fight against Radical Muslims.

Care to come by my house and try that raghead BULLSHIT I'll show ya'll some SOUTHERN HOSPITALITY 2nd Amendment Style!!

Please keep in mind that the only difference between a Radical Muslim and a Moderate Muslim is that Radical Muslims want to kill all of us Infidels and Moderate Muslims want Radical Muslims to kill all of us Infidels.  In other words. . .they are all targets.

How convenient for them that Obama has been filling our cities with Muslims right before his 'reign' ends.  I want that treasonous half-breed bastard before a firing squad.

This shit has been going on for along time with the placement of these ragheads in the government.Look who they got to chair the dnc keith ellis cant get more muslim than that It's all part of the silent calliphate it's been going on for over 30 years!!

They are slowly being injected into our government. Soon Ellis will become DNC chair and he is the most radical CAIR supporter in DC.

that should prety much do it for the muslims

Islam is EXTREMELY dangerous.

This is against the law to talk in this manner.,

What we need is a Muslim placed as chair of the DNC. Yes sir; that should straighten things out. Someone, like say Rep. Keith Ellison.

"At age 19, while attending Wayne State University in Detroit, Ellison converted from Catholicism to Islam, later giving the following explanation: "I can't claim that I was the most observant Catholic at the time [of my conversion]. I had begun to really look around and ask myself about the social circumstances of the country, issues of justice, issues of change. When I looked at my spiritual life, and I looked at what might inform social change, justice in society... I found Islam."*

* Source: Wikipedia

Hey, let the Dems pick this radical Muslim as their next chair replacement. Go for it, I say. I just love seeing them shoot themselves each time in the foot. Maybe the next shot that they fire will be in their collective heads. A Party suicide, would be nice.

If they still haven't figured out that America has had enough of the 'increasingly moving to the Left' DEMs - then I say, let them continue to experience more landslide losses at the voting booths. We all know who is controlling the DEMs and thanks to the Obama destructive policies and their poor candidate choice of re-tread (un-indicted felon) Hillary Clinton, they'll just have to peddle their anti-Americanism somewhere else. 

....and that goes for Glenn Beck, as well.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service