Gray State: David Crowley's Murder Now Listed as Hate Crime

 David Crowley's Murder is now listed as a Hate Crime, David Crowley's DOD File, never before seen, videos, images, that David saved to build a media interest in his work, at around 9 minutes and 38 seconds, we and I will present evidence that not only did the police mess up the crime scene, they left out important information.
  Gray State: David Crowley's Murder Now Listed as Hate Crime
Part 1.
  First off, Details of Minnesota filmmaker's murder, should of been turned over to the (FBI) Federal Bureau of Investigation.
  The most important find of all of it, how many pints of blood in the human body ? "The blood volume of most mammals is approximately 7 to 9% of ideal body-weight. If your 7ft giant weighed 100kg (15St 10lb), they would have a blood volume of 7 to 9 liters (12.3 to 15.85 British pints) and a 5ft person weighing half that (50kg) would have a blood volume of 6 to 8 pints."
  Remember three (3) people were murders in the living room, according to the police report.
The carpet in the living room, there is not enough blood stains on the carpet even if a small dog was killed there. So where did the blood blood go ? The blood was not under the carpet according to police images.
  David Crowley's Murder Case is now re- opened, by the TTTG News Networking Team. This case is listed by use as a hate crime, because it was a personal vendetta to establish revenge against the David Crowley Family.
  According to the Radical Islamic Terrorist a ISIS Sharia Law, has been established that they state, if a Muslim Woman violates Islam Faith by taken a non- Muslim husband , it is a ritualistic right to put her to death by bleeding her body.


  Our network team consist of people who are Muslim, and they have confirmed that the possibility of this being a hate crime, created or committed, ranks a probability of 99.9% true.

 According to media releases of the police reports, David Crowley's right hand was missing. Its was stated a gun was found in his left hand, David was right handed.


David Crowley's wife, her hair was cut off, or scalped.


  David Crowley's baby was placed between her mothers legs, according to the police report.
David Crowley's Police Report stated the crime scene was contaminated, so they were unable to do a proper investigation. The contaminated crime scene this contaminated issue deals with the family dog, the dog should of been the investigation, because a contaminated crime scene even 7 years or older can be properly investagated.
 David Crowley, there is no evidence to support he knew how to read or write Arabic. Fact is according to the police report, David got into it with Muslims on facebook, it was considered a exchange of threats and arguments.


David Crowley's DOD Files 1 & 2 uploaded today, over 3168mb avi. of videos, plus images.
David Crowley's Movie Gray State, should go on line, it has been 2 years to long.

 Gray State: David Crowley's Murder Now Listed as Hate Crime- YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOfYlp9uehM


by TTTG Networking- C.C. 2.0 Cinema

Views: 656

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Plus we found a bullet hole in the wall, please note the police dept did not note the knife as used in the crime.

The report stated, his wife was shot twice in the back of her head. And also stated she was missing her hands.
His little girl, they believe she was shot twice, because of a gun shot to the back of her head also, plus, his baby was missing most of her shoulder, arm and hand. Or Perhaps both hands.


David, according to the police report was shot in the head. And the early reports stated he was missing his right hand. Then the second written report states both hands. In a news interview, with witness, they stated they seen a hand.


This is what is important, 3 people murdered, and according to the police, all the bodies were as one would see it, shot up, so, they showed photos of the carpet, very little blood is noted, they raised up the carpet, no blood.


How much blood is in the human body for three victims of a crime. Close to 20 to 24 pints.
The bathroom had a cord in the tube, in many crime cases, dealing in certain people, they would drain the body as a warning for violating certain religious laws.
The knife found in the bloody hair, we pulled up the magnification to 100 to 200 per cent, her hair was cut off. We did believe at first the dog did this, but it is clear, her hair was cut.
In the bathroom by the garage, videos show this is where blood may have washed down into the basement area, the police took photos, now blood will not pattern a stain to where the blood looks watered down. Blood will set up in a ugly dark mess. So how did the blood get on the wall down stairs, if the victims were not bleed out first in the bathroom, then brought into the living room.
It is as of now not clearly stated, where his body was found, it was stated in front of the couch, is where they found the three bodies.


David did not read or write Arabic, and I did a test with a limp dummy hand, to smear red paint, then I used my hand as if I am so enraged, in the paint to write with, the difference in a limp hand unattached, and one that is functional, did paint a different story then what the police stated.
They only investigated David, no one else was, and even though his marriage to a very beautiful Muslim Woman, had her family angry, as well as the fact this marriage violated religious laws.
I know some would love to pin this on the Hillbilly NWO Conspiracy, and Lord knows my team and I would love to do this also.


The above is facts, now how do we push the federal buttons of the FBI
to re- open the case ?


No feet prints shown walking to this area.

News papers that were in the box photoed by police, in trash can ???????????

Police state they found the bullet David killed himself with, out of the ceiling by the front door, the house cleaners, stated the bullet fell out of the ceiling. Where is 8 pints of blood from a person with his head blown off ??????

Her hair images magnified up to 200%, does show the hair was cut off.

 Magnified up to 100%, limited amount of blood seen.

Garage, bathroom by garage, wall down below the bathroom are, as shown in the police report, but they did not explain why the blood looked watered down ?????????????

This image of David's wife or daughter, at 100% magnification, does show the hair was cut.

My last update for the two posting for "Justice For David Crowley ", the 20 or so members gave up, within our team, but Mr. Massingale did not, a 19 hour search, and he broke the encryption, which was not a encoded file, it was a mirrored pdf.

 First, Frank, I told you man this was not over, David Crowley Murder Case Re- Opened

 Now Duke, you may be right, a little of both issue are involved in this case, a year of silence, and just when they though it went away, the Anonymous Activity, is very on going now.

Rest assure, they are becoming concerned, all of them, we are not waiting them, we are going after them.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service