Graphic Video of Paris Attack Suggests Terrorists Experienced with Concerted Plan

(Warning- Extremely Graphic Video)

A brutal video from the terrorist shootings in Paris shows men armed with Kalashnikov rifles  firing heavily in the middle of a street and executing a police officer.

In the video, one of the gunmen walked over to assassinate the wounded officer, previously hit, to shoot him in the head from point-blank range as he held his hands up.

It is believed that the gunmen shouted, “We have avenged the prophet.”

Screams can be heard in the background as the two men walked down the street then headed back to their car. The terrorists spoke perfect French, and experts said the video suggests the gunmen had military training. The fact that the attack reportedly happened during a weekly editorial meeting, when a large number of staff could be expected to be present in the office, indicates that the attackers collected intelligence and carefully planned their assault.

The gunmen attacked the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. Twelve people were shot dead, and more are in critical condition. Of the 12 killed, 10 were journalists and two were police officers guarding the building.

read more:

Views: 624

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I don’t know if this vid really indicates a high level of training. It indicates some training but they didn’t have a solid understanding of taking proper cover. I like that they continuously moved and I like their choice of weapon if their had been some resistance, I couldn’t really make it out but it sounded like a .762 Kalashnikov and the shape of the mag seems to also support that. I agree, they are trained to be successful against a unarmed target, but, France, like most of Europe have such stringent gun control laws that most any target they go after is going to be unarmed. I believe if they had wanted too, they could have done a lot more damage because of this. With all of the factors included, I would have to say to them, well planned and executed. The weapons they used were a bit heavy for what they were doing but other than that……

This is not the first time the French magazine has been attacked. Charlie Hebdo has drawn much protest over cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed. The building was firebombed in November 2011 on the same day it was set to publish a cover making fun of Islamic Law.

President Obama said in a statement, “Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims of this terrorist attack and the people of France.”

French President Francoise Hollande immediately called the attack “cowardly” and an act of terror against the French people. He later visited the site of the attack. The French government raised its terror alert to the highest level following the shootings.

The terrorists are at large and on the run as as police continue their search.

Yes a peaceful religion that's for sure.


Coming to the USA any day now.  Gun Up America.

I believe there already hear and planning there attacks across the country if it weren't so why are there so many training camps across the country? If training means preparing for a job, what kind of job do they want. Obama is counting of them to cause total Chaos for him at this point the police are getting Gun Shy, Setting up Martial Law and Obama's take over! This crap won't end till he's out. Pray the Republican move fast to end this total communist take over.


You, my friend, are right on target. People say why do we allow 32 traning camps here on our soil. Because, b. hUSSEIN o. is a muslim and until WE as a people rise up and demand that they be dismantled, bho will keep letting them train for a take over here. 


Over @ DailyMail.UK site, I fought back a few comments due to respect for those that were murdered due to a cartoon.  It struck me that:

U.S. will not be backing France (EU) as we have done historically.  The murderers are the sons of our fraud vomit.  In light of that, those pens/pencils that are being held up as defiance don't make such a good weapon.  I think all of EU non-criminals have turned in their guns.  Finally what I noticed, but not too sure what to think of it:  there were photos of hundreds and hundreds a white Europeans!  Are there no blacks there?


I watched a movie couple years starring w/Samuel L. Jackson regarding a terrorist threat on US soil, I think named Unimaginable.  This clearly and accurately showed the US having NO stomach to fight the fight that is going to be needed.  FBI, CIA, XYZ none have the mindset to eliminate a threat like our enemy or warriors of the terrorists.  (Known as Islam by smart people)  EU looks like it is scr**wed, especially without a strong USA as they have enjoyed for decades & decades +.  Using their saved Military dollars on socialism and such programs...until the takers were others beyond EU.  The sea of white faces quoted Voltaire while huddled behind their desks with their weapons...the ink pen. 



 AND OF COURSE b. hUSSEIN o. WILL SIMPLY SAY, "It was a work place violence shooting or the whites were violating their civil rights."


This tragic event will be repeated in this country if our current IGNORANT government simply continues to allow foreigners to just come here and NOT assimilate. France is now re-thinking their misguided liberal policies. Wow! ......Ya think?

I'm glad that I CARRY!

All I can say is "10-4"!!!!




Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service