In a fraught moment of political protest across the country, the live mic at televised award shows has become a potent weapon.Image result for hollyweird

As such, Grammy Awards producer Ken Ehrlich has a message for those who will take the stage on Sunday’s ceremony: Bring it on.

Ehrlich has no reservations about political messages or anti-President Trump statements flying during CBS’ three and a half hour Grammycast. Artists expressing passionate opinions about real-life issues are the stuff of memorable moments, he said.

“One of the tenets of our show is artistic freedom, and over the years we’ve shown we do believe in it,” Ehrlich told Variety. “How many more times do we need to hear ‘I’d like to thank my publicist, my agent, my wife and kids.’ The great acceptance speeches are ones that have a point of view and are more personal.”

The only guidelines on speech that Ehrlich has to keep an eye (and ear) on is profanity, given the potential for CBS to be hit with FCC fines if F-bombs fly before 10 p.m. But almost everything else is fair game.

“One of the things I’ve learned from working with artists for 40 years is that they are deep-thinking, vital individuals who have interests that cover a broad cover a broad spectrum of subjects and passions,” he said. “We should certainly allow for it on the broadcast.”

Ehrlich notes that the Grammy Awards as an institution has addressed issues of social justice and equality on the telecast in recent years.

read more:

http://pagesix.com/2017/02/11/grammys-producer-says-political-accep...

Views: 396

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The entertainment idiots didn't affect the election so, what is the point to have them give political comments on the Grammy Awards? A solution to the immigrant problem would be for each wealthy entertainer to adopt about 1000 immigrants and live with them. We will notice a remarkable change in their opinions thereafter! 

Their speaches will go unheard.

What if they want to be political and they're PRO-Trump?  Will the mic accidentally go on the fritz?

  1. I don't think it matters, they won't have any viewers any way.

Sure they will:  liberals, millennials, snowflakes....

Bought and paid for by George Soreass !

I have not watched their stupid participation trophy award crap for the last 40 years. They play make believe and if I want to do that I will with my grandkids. They are nothing but a cabel of fools.

The fools think that the audience cares about their opinions.  What a joke, is this comedy standup time?

Who really cares???

There are a lot of more important things to worry about, besides those idiots!

i aint watching this crap...i cant stand being preached to by this asinine bunch of whack jobs.

Now the elites seem to be proud of their positions as the HERDING DRIVERS of the populous. No doubt they must bow down to the Super rich world owners who OWN Hollywood. Who also provide their OUTRAGEOUS COSTS for their performing. in case you HOLLYWOOD IDIOTS, don't realize it..., EVERYONE..., is an actor. Shakespeare knew it..., and you simple idiots..., are so illiterate..., you failed to recognize it!!! When the NWO monsters take over..., guess who will be least in demand to influence the HERD? .........., IT'S YOU BOZO!!!

The Grammys can take flight to hell with the Oscars.
There was a time when Hollywood was the most powerful arm of the American culture today it is filth and garbage.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

Gohmert: Dems Will Drag Out Impeachment — Try To Get ‘Best Socialist’ Nominated For President

During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN on Thursday, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) offered his best assessment of what House Democrats were trying to accomplish with their impeachment efforts.

Gohmert told WVNN’s “The Jeff Poor Show” impeachment could tie up the Democratic Party’s presidential campaign efforts but predicted Democrats would use the occasion to nominate “the best socialist” they can.

“They would lose in the Senate,” Gohmert said on impeachment. “And besides that, the entire time it was on trial in the Senate, the Democrats who are running for president wouldn’t be allowed to campaign. That’s in the Constitution. They wouldn’t be able to campaign. I just can’t imagine them wanting to do that because if they send it to the Senate, they have now perfectly set up the scenario of 1996, where they will reassure Donald Trump is reelected as president. They don’t want to do that. They’re probably going to drag this thing out as long as they possibly can … through Iowa, through primaries — try to get the best socialist they can to be nominated.”

“Then just end up and say, ‘Now we’re close enough to the general election. We’ve thrown mud at the president through the House,’” he continued. “What they’re really doing — they’re using taxpayer funds to campaign against Trump. That’s all this is — a campaign fund that taxpayers are paying for in order to try to throw mud at the president. I’ll be surprised if they have that vote, but I can’t imagine they want to set up this president for reelection by having a trial in the Senate where they lose.”

Veteran's Day Tribute

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service