GOVERNMENT SEEKS 'AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE WHAT IS SIN'



Legal team warns of ramifications of wrong decision at Supreme Court



In its Supreme Court battle over Obamacare’s abortion-pill mandate, the government wants to “determine what is in fact a sin,” contends a religious-rights legal group.

The high court has agreed to hear the case of the Denver-based Little Sisters of the Poor nuns, who refused to comply with the requirement that the insurance policies for their employees cover abortion pills.

The nuns have refused to sign over the responsibility to their insurance company, arguing it also would be a violation of their faith to facilitate someone else committing a sin.

Now a friend-of-the-court brief submitted by the Thomas More Law Center on behalf of dozens of clients charges the government is seeking to become the arbiter of religious beliefs.

The group’s chief counsel, Richard Thompson, called the mandate “a monumental attack on religious liberty.”

“If this appeal is lost, the government becomes the head of every religious denomination in the country by its assumed authority to determine what is in fact a sin,” he said.

The brief argues that the neither the government nor the lawyers on the Supreme Court bench “can determine whether an act does or does not violate a person’s religious beliefs.”

“Rather, the Supreme Court must accept the non-profits’ assertions that the notification requirement is indeed against their religion.”

To accept otherwise, the brief says, “is to supplant the church and the Bible with the government, allowing the Supreme Court and the government to interpret [tenets] of faith.

“This slippery slope would subject all religious exercise to the whim of the government’s approval.”

The brief points out that it’s already been decided that the fines for noncompliance are a substantial burden, leaving essentially the question of “whether compliance is actually against the petitioners’ religion.”

“This is something that is for petitioners to determine, not the court,” the Thomas More Law Center says.

“The court is not the arbiter of sacred Scripture and cannot determine whether the notification form and letter are attenuated enough from the provision of contraceptives that they do not substantially burden petitioners’ religion,” the brief says. “Delving into this inquiry requires the court to interpret petitioners’ religious beliefs on the morality of the different levels of complicity with sin.

“Therefore, the court can only determine whether petitioners are being compelled to do something that violates their faith – here, filling out the notification form or writing a notification letter to HHS, both of which trigger the dissemination of contraceptives and abortifacients to their employees in connection with their employee health plans.”

The brief point out that a woman’s right to get contraceptives is not unlimited.

“This does not mean they have a right to free contraceptives and abortifacients. Moreover, this right certainly does not mean that a person has the right to obtain contraceptives and abortifacients – either directly or indirectly – from their employer at the expense of pillaging the employer’s religious liberty,” the brief states.

The Little Sisters charge the government is forcing them to violate their faith by giving them a choice between providing contraceptives and abortion pills directly or ordering them to sign over their responsibility to someone else.

“These notification requirements trigger the non-profits’ insurers to provide free contraceptives and abortifacients to the women in the non-profits’ health plans. This notification requirement makes the non profits complicit in the provision of a service that they find sinful, thereby causing them to sin themselves,” the brief explains.

The law center argues there should not even be a case.

“The government already subsidizes contraceptives and abortifacients through its programs and could find ways to expand or increase the efficacy of those existing programs,” the brief says.

“The government could offer grants, go directly to insurers, or engage in countless other options that do not involve the cooperation of petitioners.”

Further, providing “free contraceptives and abortifacients” is not a compelling government interest, the law center argues, quoting the Supreme Court itself.

“The many exemptions already provided for under the regulations necessarily destroy any argument that the HHS mandate serves a compelling interest.”

It was the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that took on the authority of determining what is sin.

Another recent brief challenged: “Perhaps the apex among a host of acts of governmental arrogance in this case was displayed not by HHS, but when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit acted as if it had ecclesiastical powers of absolution, having decreed that by just signing a paper, Little Sisters would not be ‘morally complicit in providing contraceptive coverage.'”

The brief said one would expect that “on the issue of who the God of Heaven and Earth will hold ‘morally complicit,’ it would be the Little Sisters which would have the greater expertise than a federal judge.”


http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/government-seeks-authority-to-determine-...

Views: 526

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

LOL HA HA

FIRST THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, THEN THE REBEL FLAG. THEN THE AMERICAN FLAG AND THEN THE CROSS. THEN YOU.

MY TOASTER DID NOT WORK THIS MORNING
 

I knew it. The democrats have attacked our grid. Oh the humanities. Not since the Hindenberg have I seen such a disaster. There I was standing with my butter knife ready to apply a generous amount of cholesteral builder with marmalade standing by. I did what any bribe taking politician would do. I read my shocked and appalled speech, Then I called for an investigation. Organized a committee and scheduled a 2:00PM press conference. I then turned it over to the FBI and planned to write a book.  Then my grandson came in and plugged in the toaster. Just in time we were about to go to DEAFCOM one.

IF BEING A CONSERVATIVE MEANS BEING A LOSER, I'LL TAKE TRUMP AND THE WHITEHOUSE.
Everybody is talking about the constitution. It is gone. The supreme court is gone. The republican party is gone. The military is gone.
Never give up the ship.
TWO NAVY BATTLE BOATS captured by an Iranian fisherman. What two fighting words are missing from this scenario? BATTLE STATIONS. Remember John Paul Jones on the deck of the sinking Bon Homme Richard saying I have just begun to fight and he took the Serapis. Now we have a stand down Navy. Admiral Lemon Mullen who was alleged to have said I will never fire on Iran and backed up the Benghazi murders and cover up has set the pace for the take down of the US Fleet. Manufacturing won WWII.
Mfg is gone. JOBS ARE GONE. The cities are gone. Fresh water in Flint is gone. Healthcare is gone. Social security is dwindling. The schools are gone. The ten commandments are gone. The rebel flag is gone. The American flag is next and finally the cross. The second ammendment is on the way out just like the first ammendment. Freedom of religion is gone unless you are a jihadist. You lost your country and you are never getting it back. CRUZ can't get it back. Rubio can't get it back. Riance Pemis can't get it back. The communist party that held the power for 8 years ain't giving it up. They will kill to keep it. We are living in a war zone. Cops aren't even safe. Freedom is gone. Take off your shoes. Helicopter moms soon will need gun ships. So while fools debate about what once was we have only one alternative to survive. EL TRUMPO. IF HE WINS AMERICA WINS. More tea anybody?
THE NATIONAL REPUKE IS A RINO RAG FOUNDED BY A POT HEAD WITH A GREAT VOCABULARY. THE WEAKLY STANDOWN IS NO BETTER. BEWARE FIX NEWS.
SPIRIT OF AMERICA PARTY RADIO SHOW on blog talk radio.com and tune-inradio.com
Finally white entertainers are tired of being boycotted by the all black entertainment network and discriminated against. The super great white entertainers will now have their own show. it will preview early this week on blog talk radio. the spirit of america party radio show. you will be notified of our grand opening. WET White entertainment Theatre. The best and it is all white. All Wet.

Sin??? God gave Moses 10 Commandments. His only begotton Son, Jesus, spoke of 12 sins. Man has added their idea of what is sin. I believe evil and good is God given. Right and wrong is Government given.

The hole Obama administration and the Progressive Democrat party is a Mortal Sin !

You are about half right. Right, and wrong is not government given. They are too busy doing WRONG, to do any right.

What the hell ever happened to the "separation of church & state?"

There has NEVER been any such thing as "separation of church and state"

It's no surprise this is happening. They have had the Ten foundational commandments of law hanging in every court house in America and wouldn't uphold them so they took them down to avoid seeing them and being reminded of what standards are. So now they will try and rewrite the laws to descuise sin, Jesus is coming soon.

The WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES, are owned, and operated by the United Nations. You had better check, and see if YOUR CHURCH is among them.

THE GATES OF HELL WILL NOT PREVAIL. The gates are government and they have tried to control humans for thousands of years. Gods people only get stronger the more there ordered by the king the stronger they grow in Faith. The only name that is feared is the name of Jesus the bible tells us the demons fear the name of Jesus. And if it were not so His name wouldn't be attacked from the evil one. Government knows His name and they fear the people when they call on His name, so there goal is to remove the name from the youngest first by removing it in schools and colleges. Then remove the name from government buildings, remove the cross, remove the 10 Comandments, pass laws aginist the values in the bible, but each time it go so far there is a return back and country's fall. America is no different. She will fall as long as it keeps going farther from truth.

You've got to be kidding. These are the same people that can't abide by the laws they pass, obey their own Oath of Office, abide by the Constitution or balance a budget, but they think they are capable of determining what is a "sin"?  Tell them to buy a Bible, because those laws are already written in stone.

Hmm, thought that was what the government wanted.  Government taking the place of God.  NO FREAKING WAY!!!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service