Gov. Jerry Brown Quietly, Deceitfully Passed ‘Ballot Harvesting’ Law in 2016

California Gov. Jerry Brown quietly signed legislation two years ago that legalized the dubious practice of “ballot-harvesting” in California, paving the way for Democrats to “find” hundreds of thousands of votes after election day and “legally” flip long-held conservative seats.

 Very few people noticed when Jerry Brown signed the changes in AB1921 into law in 2016, but the party had a plan and they put it into action with devastating effect in 2018.


California Gov. Jerry Brown quietly signed legislation two years ago that legalized the dubious practice of "ballot-harvesting" in California, paving the way for Democrats to "find" hundreds of thousands of votes after election day and "legally" flip long-held conservative seats.

 As a result of the dubious new law introduced by Jerry Brown, California lost 7 of its 14 Republican House seats this election cycle.

What is ballot harvesting?

 Ballot harvesting is illegal in most US states and the rest of the world. In Texas, New York and Pennsylvania they arrest people for ballot harvesting.

 California, on the other hand, has a law that actually permits it. Anyone can turn in ballots now, no questions asked, no chain of custody required.

 California’s AB 1921 allows voters to give any third party — not just a relative or someone living in the same household, as was previously the law — to collect and turn in anyone else’s completed ballot.

 Called “ballot harvesting,” critics say the practice is ripe for fraud. Consider “Lulu,” who was recorded trying to “harvest” what she thought was a Democratic voter’s ballot in Rep. Knight’s district.

 Orange County, traditionally a conservative enclave in Southern California, turned all blue for the first time in living memory after Democrats found hundreds of thousands of votes after election day.

 Republicans such as Mimi Walters, Dana Rohrabacher and Young Kim were all ahead election night only to lose their races after late ballots were counted.

 The amount of mail-in ballots counted in Orange County was unprecedented – a whopping 250,000 ballots were produced in OC as a result of Jerry Brown’s new “ballot harvesting” law.

 The case of Korean-American GOP candidate Young Kim was one of the most egregious examples. On election night, Kim held an 8,000 vote lead over her Democratic opponent Gil Cisneros, and even attended freshman orientation in Washington, D.C. before watching her lead, and her victory, slowly disappear in the subsequent weeks as Democrats kept handing in “found” votes.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported:

“In Orange County alone, where every House seat went Democratic, “the number of Election Day vote-by-mail dropoffs was unprecedented — over 250,000,” Fred Whitaker, chairman of the county Republican Party, said in a note to supporters. “This is a direct result of ballot harvesting allowed under California law for the first time. That directly caused the switch from being ahead on election night to losing two weeks later.”

GWP reports: The voting system in California is so bad that a Democrat in California’s 21st district who was down by 6.4% on election night ended up winning three weeks later.

 The Democrats don’t even hide their blatant voter fraud anymore – they just pass laws to make election fixing legal and the Republican party just sits back and allows it.

 Even Paul Ryan, the RINO of all RINOs questioned the suspicious results in California.

 If conservatives don’t fight back, the left will implement “ballot harvesting” laws across the country and steal every election going forward.

Watch more on “ballot harvesting” here:

https://newspunch.com/jerry-brown-ballot-harvesting-law/

Views: 24

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

California Gov. Jerry Brown, what can you say man, you do look stupid...LMAO

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Ken Catalino

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

‘Breaking: Supreme Court Sides With Trump Over Sanctuary Cities In Deportation Case

 The US Supreme Court sided with President Trump over sanctuary cities today in a 5-4 decision.

The court ruled the government has the power to detain people who are facing deportation because of the crimes they committed.

Chief Justice John Roberts joined justices Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh in the majority.

Bloomberg.com reported:

A divided U.S. Supreme Court bolstered the government’s power to detain people who are facing deportation because of crimes they committed, siding with the Trump administration in a clash with implications for so-called sanctuary cities.

The case focused on non-citizen legal residents who serve a criminal sentence, get released and later are arrested by federal immigration agents.

The 5-4 ruling Tuesday said those people aren’t entitled to a bond hearing, and the possibility of re-release, while the Homeland Security Department presses its case for deportation. The ruling reversed a decision by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

In announcing the decision from the bench, Justice Samuel Alito said the lower court had made a “policy judgment” using reasoning that “makes a mockery” of the federal immigration laws…

…Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh joined the majority, but they splintered in their reasoning.

Thomas and Gorsuch didn’t agree with all of Alito’s opinion. They said courts lack power to consider issues involving the detention of non-citizens until those people are facing a deportation order.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service