GOP Snakes Join Democrats – Will Introduce Bill to Protect Dirty Cop Robert Mueller

GOP snakes Lindsey Graham and Thom Tillis from North Carolina will join with Democrats to introduce a bill to protect Dirty Cop Robert Mueller.

This is why Republicans will lose in a landslide in November.
They can’t keep attacking the president and defending crooked cops and expect voters to turn out to support them.

And, of course, they will blame President Trump for their losses.

The Hill reported:

A group of bipartisan senators is introducing new legislation to limit President Trump’s ability to fire special counsel Robert Mueller.

Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.). Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Christopher Coons (D-Del.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) will introduce the legislation, the Special Counsel Independence and Integrity Act, on Wednesday.

The legislation would let Mueller, or any other special counsel, receive an “expedited judicial review” within 10 days of being fired to determine if it was for a “good cause.” If it was determined it wasn’t, he would be reinstated.

It would also codify regulations that only a senior Justice Department official can fire a special counsel and that they must provide the reason in writing.

“We need to ensure not only that special counsel Mueller can complete his work without interference, but that special counsels in future investigations can, too,” Coons said.

Tillis added that the “compromise bipartisan bill helps ensure that special counsels — present or future — have the independence they need to conduct fair and impartial investigations.”

Views: 102

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

They cannot write law that supercedes the Constitution. He has the authority as Chief Executive, to fire and appoint as he sees fit, those who oversee the agencies that fall under his authority,.

Article 1 Section 2.

They can pass it all they want, POTUS has VETO powers and I'm sure this won't get passed his desk. We really need to rid ourselves of these establishment TRAITORS in our party. FUCK'EM!!



Please tell me how? How can they introduce a bill to protect this guy??? I want to know?????

nice if they took this kind of time to undo ohitlercare or protect the border w/the WALL wouldn' t it

time they all are FIRED

 I asked this for a reason, How can they introduce a bill to protect this guy? I have sent this to the network team, so far we have not found any legislation to where they can present a bill to Congress to protect criminal activity.

 If they was to do this, it would spark a resistance against this system right here and now!!!

Sens. Graham, Tillis, Booker and Coons, all traitors, are stupid and Mueller agrees. Mueller is trying to get Trump to fire him and these ignorant fools are helping Trump by making it impossible. He (Mueller) thinks he can save face if the investigation is ended this way.

save face he has little to show for his scam of an investigation into what

what is the statute Trump broke?  what is being investigated?  manafort for money laundering seriously don't be insulting

these clowns need to go we need to fire them all 

$7,000,000 Mueller’s Spent on Trump Could Prosecute 15,000 Everyday Criminals

Robert Mueller’s special counsel probe targeting President Trump has cost the American taxpayer $7 million in five months, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

And, if the media reports are any indication, there’s no end in sight.

So, who have Mueller and his people ensnared so far? Michael Flynn, the former national security advisor, pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI. This is hardly a surprise; given Flynn’s lobbying for Turkey and undisclosed relationship with Russia, he probably could have gotten worse.

Paul Manafort and his business partner were charged for financial misdeeds that happened before Manafort became Trump’s campaign manager (and Manafort, whom Trump fired relatively quickly, only got the position because the GOP establishment wanted “adult supervision” once it became clear Trump would win the nomination).

Then there was George Papadopoulos, a weird, minor volunteer staffer who lied about his relations with a shifty, self-aggrandizing professor who claimed to have Kremlin connections.

Seven million dollars for that. Money well spent, you say? You probably do, if you’re a liberal.

If you’ve ever had your car broken into, however, you might want to think again.

If you don’t see the connection, let me explain with a little help from the Rand Corporation.

In 2016, the non-profit policy think-tank released a study called “First Estimates of Judicial Costs of Specific Crimes, from Homicide to Theft.” It revealed what it cost to prosecute certain crimes in our judicial system.

“When considering the costs of crime, policymakers and the general public typically think about the tens of thousands of dollars spent annually to house a single prisoner,” the report reads.

“The outlays in judicial and legal services have received far less attention, depriving taxpayers of a broader picture of the dollar impact of major crimes and potential savings from crime reduction measures, according to researchers.”

So, how much does prosecuting these crimes cost?

“Researchers found that every reported homicide, for example, cost the judicial system $22,000 to $44,000. In other categories the costs were estimated at $2,000 to $5,000 for a rape or other sexual assault, $600 to $1,300 for a robbery, $800 to $2,100 for an aggravated assault, $200 to $600 for a burglary, $300 to $600 for larceny/theft, and $200 to $400 for a motor vehicle theft.”

At the low end, that means five months of Mueller’s fishing expedition could have prosecuted 35,000 burglars or car thieves, over 11,000 robbers, 8,750 individuals who allegedly committed aggravated assault, 3,500 alleged rapists, or 318 murderers.

The median judicial cost of larceny/theft is $455. That means 15,000 criminals that could be prosecuted with the money we’ve spent on trying to tie Trump to Russia.

Instead, that $7 million has netted four individuals, two of whom are charged with things that had nothing to do with the Trump campaign, one whose alleged misdeeds led to his firing almost as soon as he was hired, and one minor staffer who lied about contact with a weird academic who claimed he could make meetings happen with the Russians that never materialized.


 Dad has been looking into Mueller and one other, there is something missing, no one is so clean that is involved in this Democratic System. Its like be for real, all the scandals posted all over the net and on the news, and the FBI is basically still under the Democratic Control.

 So, Trump has not or will not be able to keep his promise.

Shameful of these RINO so called republicans!! They are all Anti-Christian and Jewish People / Anti-USA Capitalism and Constitution!!

Please Pray for our Judeo-Christian Nation United States of America and Israel-Yisrael and our Christian Earth Everyday!! "Pray Without Ceasing." ( 1 Thessalonians 5:17 KJV )!!

Agree, this is the only answer for this country!




Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert


OMG!! -> Government Now Wants To Seize Your Car For Going 5MPH Over The Limit

We’ve discussed this on and off for several years now. Civil asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows the government to seize assets and cash from citizens without any due process or judicial oversight.

You don’t even have to be charged with a crime. You are assumed guilty unless you can somehow prove your innocence.

Of course, not everyone has this ability… if you aren’t local, state, or federal law enforcement, this is called stealing, and you go to prison.

But the government is actually a bigger problem than common thieves.

A 2015 report showed that law enforcement used civil asset forfeiture to steal more from US residents than every thief, robber, and burglar in America combined.

About $4.5 BILLION worth of cash, cars, homes, and other property is taken by civil asset forfeiture each year – hundreds of millions more than common criminals steal.

And it happens at every level. Your local cop can use civil asset forfeiture just like your state trooper. And then any one of the armed agents of the US government—from the FBI to the Fish and Wildlife Service—can rob you for whatever reason they want.

This travesty continues to grow because the cops who take your stuff get to keep it. Police departments and government agencies around the country depend on civil asset forfeiture to boost their budgets.

Cops will literally keep some of the cars they take as squad cars. And they make a fortune auctioning off the houses, boats, and anything else they confiscate.

Obviously this gives cops an incentive to steal, whether or not they actually think the property was used in a crime, or acquired illegally. Remember, civil asset forfeiture adds billions every year to their bottom line.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case of civil asset forfeiture.

Tyson Timbs was convicted of selling a small amount of drugs to an undercover police officer. He was sentenced to house arrest, and paid about $1,200 in fines.

But then police used civil asset forfeiture to take his $42,000 Land Rover which Timbs purchased with money from a life insurance policy after his father died. The money did not come from selling drugs, or any other illegal activity.

Timbs sued, and the case made its way to the Supreme Court, because every lower court in Indiana said the forfeiture was perfectly legit.

The case revolves around whether or not the seizure of the Land Rover was an excessive fine under the 8th amendment, and whether or not this protection against excessive fines applies to state governments.

And the public got some crazy insight into the government’s position.

The Indiana Solicitor General was arguing in favor of civil asset forfeiture when Justice Stephen Breyer asked him a hypothetical.

Breyer asked, if a state needs revenue, could it force someone to forfeit their Bugatti, Mercedes, or Ferrari for speeding? Even if they were going just 5 miles per hour over the speed limit?

And the utterly appalling answer from the Indiana Solicitor General was, yes.

That’s right… the official government position is that they can steal any amount of your property in “connection” with any crime whatsoever, no matter how trivial the crime may be… even exceeding the speed limit by 5 miles per hour.

This is how overbearing and authoritarian the government has become in the land of the free.

This is how much power your local cop has… and the power only grows as you go to state, and federal officials.

If there is any solace in any of this, it is that the other Supreme Court Justices were reportedly laughing at this exchange.

The justices seemed incredulous that Indiana’s top lawyer was using such absurd assertions and flimsy reasoning in his arguments.

So, for now, we can keep our cars if we get pulled over for speeding. But that may not always be the case…

Depending on how this is ruled, it could pave the way for even more egregious abuses of power… or it could curb the practice, and reign in these thieves in uniforms.

Just understand where the government is coming from. These politicians, bureaucrats and officers think they can do whatever they want. Absolutely anything goes, with no limitation whatsoever.

And that makes it a little tough to feel like you really live in the land of the free.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service