Glenn Beck: Electing Hillary Clinton ‘Is a Moral, Ethical Choice’


The Blaze founder Glenn Beck took to his Facebook page last Saturday to urge his followers to abandon support of Republican nominee Donald Trump, declaring that if such an action results in the election of Hillary Clinton, “so be it” because “[a]t least it is a moral, ethical choice.”

Beck’s latest missive was in response to the release of an 11-year-old hot-mic tape of Trump saying lewd things about women.

“If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice,” Beck wrote.

The following is Beck’s complete Facebook post:

Every person, each of us must decide what is a bridge too far.

Mike Lee has obviously reached that point, where the moral compromise his party is asking him to make is simply beyond what is acceptable.

It is not acceptable to ask a moral, dignified man to cast his vote to help elect an immoral man who is absent decency or dignity.

If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice.

If she is elected, the world does not end…. Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media , through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal [sic].

read more:

Views: 924

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

And he professes to be an American supporter?

My dropping Beck 10 years ago makes me feel smarter every day.

He used to talk for America. Now he uses the words Hillary and ethical in conjunction. He has turned into an absolute goof ball. When are his sponsors going to realize they are flushing good money?

Glenn must be hitting the bottle again

She has something on him.

I totally all started right after he moved to TX...I notice how he wasn't the same person anymore..and I quit watching him on his Blaze program..very sad

I feel bad for Glenn. He worked so hard to rebuild his life after years of being intoxicated ... and now he carries his POV on Conservatism to an illogical extreme that will crash all be has built.
If I prayed I would pray for him ... If y'all pray, pray for him.
Among the other things a President H will do is continue the FCC's assault on free speech on the airwaves ... If she wins it won't be long before all conservative talkers, & writers in the alternative media are banished by content regulation ...
As bad as I feel for him I feel worse about the potential results of his delusional ranting about moral & ethical voting ... Given the stakes in this election we must be bold & pragmatic. There is no choice but Trump.

Glen Beck is a disgusting drama queen,he really wanted Ted Cruze and didn't get him so he is stupidly against Trump and it's going to hurt him, I for one will never listen to his Radio Show again and I hope millions of Americans join me, Beck should not be allowed to broadcast his lies on the air,a year ago he was worth $85 Million so he can afford his next meal,every one request that the FCC pull his license to operate and shut him down.

beck has lost his mind! Trump is no bargain but, he's still better than clinton!

I'm afraid he's lost his moral compass. How can he say Hillary would be a moral and ethical choice, knowing her past, present and future plans. 

Yep, no kidding.

I agree.....HOWEVER.... a stinking half dead gutter rat would be better the the H bitch.   Maybe when Mr Trump is elected, after he appoints a special prosecutor for the whore-lord clinton, he can send her to Benghazi for a few years....???????

That Clinton Foundation money is starting to smell good doesn't it Glenn? I'm withdrawing my support from you Glenn, and I expect many others to do the same. Go shine at your own expense Saint Glenn.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service