Gingrich: Mueller’s Law Firm Gave 99.81% of Its Donations to Hillary Clinton Last Year

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told Fox News’s Sean Hannity on Thursday that 99.81% of donations from special counsel Robert Mueller‘s former law firm went to Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

“The Mueller investigation has so many conflicts of interest, it’s almost an absurdity,” Gingrich said. “The law firm that he came from, gave 99.81% of its donations to Hillary Clinton last year.”

“That’s right, .19 of 1% went to Donald Trump,” he said.

“The people that he’s been hiring are all anti-Trump lawyers. It’s hard to understand why he would assemble such a team unless it was a deliberate effort to go after the president and the president’s team. I don’t understand why the House and Senate Judiciary Committees aren’t investigating a lot of this stuff,” Newt said.

He continued: “The point you made about leaks is a perfectly good example. The leaks have to be coming from inside Mueller’s team. So who’s leaking? Why is nothing being done about it? Why are people not being fired? I think it’s very reasonable to say that this is a very dangerous witch hunt that Mueller keeps expanding because he can’t find anything in the original charge. ”

“He’s not going to find anything about Trump and Russia, and yet he’s hired all these guys who have given up their very expensive law services to come out and try to get somebody. And they’re going to eventually find somebody to prosecute because there are too many lawyers being paid too much money for them to go home having accomplished nothing.”

Image result for Robert Mueller

Views: 54

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This whole charade needs to end and it needs to end with people in jail.

Trump needs to wake up and smell the roses.

Trump said it before.........IT'S A WITCH HUNT!

Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself, then Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed Mueller as special counsel to oversee the federal investigation into Russian interference in 2016 election.  When Sessions recused himself, he let the fox into the chicken house...........Rosenstein, Mueller, and Comey are having a feast on chickens.

It could be that Mueller, or Rosenstein, and Comey, have information concerning Sessions tenure in government that Sessions doesn't want disclosed.  The Obama bunch was in charge for eight years and you can bet they dug up dirt on everyone in sight that represented a threat to the Obama myth, and the Clintons are professional dirt diggers. In fact, that may be the reason Obama wanted Clinton as Sec. of State.

Better to have them in the tent pissing out, rather than outside pissing in.  And that phrase is borrowed from LBJ.

At any rate, something is restraining Sessions from doing his duty.  I think he wants to avoid being fired since it would look real bad on his resume, but recusing himself and playing like he is above reproach is not going to work forever.  Sessions is demonstrating his ineptness as AG as well as being a responsible human being who accepted the position of chief law enforcer, and refuses to do it by pretending that it is not really his responsibility.

And that is dereliction of duty. Plain and simple.

Trump had better fire him.

THANK YOU.  THE question I keep asking over and over and over.....  The Trump-haters keep talking about Trump collusion to win the election, and I have yet to hear ANYBODY say what evidence they have proving Russia had anything to do with it.  Do they have any links PROVING hacking?  Do they have ANY kind of trail to anyone/anything?  Russia hasn't done to the best of knowledge anything more than some of our politicians like Obama traveling the globe and making his pitch for candidates he'd like to see win other elections...  All I see is a new phobia (by choice) russiaphobia

Nope, there is none to be had. Only the Russia collusion with HBeast and her cronies in the party of rats.




Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


SICK: Leprosy On The Rise In Los Angeles 

Ahh, the joys of open borders and Democrat leadership.

California is not just a public toilet but now there is evidence that leprosy is on the rise in Los Angeles County.

Barack Obama changed US law in 2016 and allowed immigrants with blistering STDs and leprosy to migrate to the US.

Medscape reported:

Leprosy, also known as Hansen’s disease, is rarely seen in the United States, but cases continue to emerge in Los Angeles County, a new report says.

“Hansen’s disease still exists, and we need to educate medical students and physicians,” coauthor Dr. Maria Teresa Ochoa from Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, told Reuters Health by email.

Dr. Ochoa and colleagues identified 187 patients with the disease in a review of medical records from their leprosy clinic spanning 1973 to 2018. Most patients were Latino, originating from Mexico, and they experienced a median delay in diagnosis of more than three years, the team reports JAMA Dermatology, online August 7.

Multibacillary leprosy (MB) cases outnumbered paucibacillary leprosy (PB) cases by nearly eight to one (88.6% vs. 11.4%, respectively), and Latino patients were more likely than non-Latino patients to have MB, as were patients from Central or South America (versus other regions).

Most patients (80.7%) received multidrug therapy, and most (92.6%) received antibiotics for more than two years, especially if they had MB.

Only about half of patients (56.7%) had World Health Organization (WHO) grade 0 disability (no signs or symptoms suggestive of leprosy or disability) at the one-year follow-up, whereas 16.0% had grade 1 disability (loss of protective sensation) and 26.2% had grade 2 disability (visible deformity) at the last follow-up.

Among the patients who lost protective sensation, 87.7% (50/57) did not regain it following therapy.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service