From FBI fragments, a question: Did Team Clinton destroy evidence under subpoena?

Image result for crooked hillaryThe incomplete records of the Hillary Clinton email investigation released by the FBI raise questions about the conduct not only of Clinton but of her top aides and the staffers working under their direction. Perhaps the most serious is whether the Clinton team destroyed evidence which they were under legal order to save and produce to congressional investigators.

Out of a massive investigation, the FBI has released just two documents: a heavily-redacted version of its summary report and a writeup — the so-called 302 — from agents' July 2 interview with Clinton. The rest, including reports from interviews with other players, remains secret, although the FBI has shared it with Congress, with redactions and under tight viewing restrictions.

Shortly after the two documents were released on the Friday afternoon before Labor Day, Rep. Trey Gowdy, chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, sent out a statement suggesting he does not believe the documents tell the full story, and that if the full story were told it might suggest wrongdoing on the part of the Clinton team.


"The FBI selectively releasing Secretary Clinton's interview summary is of little benefit to the public unless and until all relevant documents and witness interview summaries are released," Gowdy said. "The public is entitled to all relative information, including the testimony of the witnesses at Platte River Networks, the entity which maintained the private server. The public will find the timeline and witness responses and failures to respond instructive."

What did Gowdy mean? What are the still-unreleased documents? And what does "instructive" mean? Here is what we know, from what the FBI has released, plus earlier reports about the investigation into the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi:

Nine days after the attack, on Sept. 20, 2012, the House Subcommittee on National Security, Homeland Defense, and Foreign Operations, which is part of the larger Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, sent a document request to Clinton, who was still Secretary of State. It was a broad request, intended to cover anything written or recorded in any way that might have something to do with Benghazi. It without question covered emails. The State Department produced some material in response, but never any emails from Clinton.

Several months later, on Aug. 1, 2013, the Oversight Committee issued a subpoena covering the documents asked for, but not received, after the Sept. 20, 2012 request.


In May, 2014, the House Select Committee on Benghazi was formed. On July 23, 2014, the State Department agreed to produce records to the committee. The FBI report picks up the story from there:

[The State Department] sent a formal request to former Secretaries of State on October 28, 2014, asking them to produce e-mails related to their government work. After State requested that Clinton provide her e-mails, Clinton asked her attorneys, David Kendall and [Cheryl] Mills, to oversee the process of providing Clinton's work-related emails to State. Heather Samuelson, an attorney working with Mills, undertook a review to identify work-related e-mails, while Kendall and Mills oversaw the process. Ultimately, on December 5, 2014, Williams & Connolly [Kendall's firm] provided approximately 55,000 pages of e-mails to State in response to State's request for Clinton to produce all e-mail in her possession that constituted a federal record from her tenure as Secretary of State. State ultimately reviewed the 55,000 pages of e-mail to meet its production obligations related to [Freedom of Information Act] lawsuits and requests….Clinton told the FBI she directed her legal team to provide any work-related or arguably work-related emails to State; however she did not participate in the development of the specific process to be used or in discussions of the locations of where her e-mails might exist. Clinton was not consulted on specific e-mails in order to determine if they were work-related.

read more:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/from-fbi-fragments-a-question-did...

Views: 278

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

i do not doubt this at all coming from this vile contemptible piece of crap   VOTE TRUMP

You can bet the CRACK team at the FBI won't have a CLUE!  With their leader, James Comey' reputation for honesty and integrity COMPLETELY DESTROYED, it appears, ,with he and the even worse Attorney General Loretta Lynch running the now demonstrated TOTALLY CORRUPT FBI and Justice Department, every continuing disclosure of illegal actions and cover-up will be completely ignored.

Imagine, such a corrupt person as Hillary even a possibility of becoming President (just because she doesn't have a "pepe" - but do we know that for sure?)!

They should have gone in and seized everything at one time and arrested her.

 The Left are criminals sucking this country dry. They are sinners that are over due to die a disgraceful death. Their skulls should be crushed or at least fractured? Put a round in it.

I find it depressing to realize that Hillary Clinton will never be prosecuted for crimes that would result in incarceration for any of us "little people" had we been caught committing them. Having spent over thirty years in military service working with publications that were "Classified" or higher, I know the rules for their handling and understand what may happen if one is caught and charged with mishandling them. Reading through Mrs. Clinton's responses to questions concerning her knowledge of the government classification system and her knowledge of security required for digital communication creates a permeating essence of BS. I find it incredulous that a candidate for POTUS would claim to be so ignorant and publicly abase herself by doing so. Despite her imperious manner and icy stares, she is groveling and will do anything to gain the Presidency. By her own admission,  she is too stupid to be President. By her own performance as Secretary of State, she is unfit.

IT IS NOT TOO LATE TO IMPEACH, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, HE IS THINKING OF RUNNING FOR A THIRD TERM, IF HILLARY CLINTON IS INDICTED OR INCAPACITATED, PLEASE CONTACT,

www.northamericanlawcenter.org   &  www.cactn.weebly.com   ALSO  www.nationallibertyalliance.org/cos

The devil doesn't even believe this vile pig! Bill doesn't believe her, either!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by Lisa Benson

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Pelosi Disaster!  95% Of Americans Tuned Out Impeachment Show Trials On Friday — Only The Second Day Of Testimony

Despite the constant hype Americans are already tuning out the sham impeachment trials.

On the second day of the public show trials 95% of Americans turned off the nonsense.

Americans are worn out by all of the fake news and hysteria.

Devastating.

Dan Gainor   @dangainor
 

Yawn: 95% of U.S. Adults Skipped Day 2 of Democrats' Impeachment Hearings 

Yawn: 95% of U.S. Adults Skipped Friday’s Impeachment Hearings

Americans aren’t exactly obsessed with the Democrats’ impeachment hearings, it seems. Friday’s second day of live, wall-to-wall coverage drew an average of 12.7 million viewers on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN,

Flashback: Horrible News For Shifty Schiff – Majority Of Americans Don’t Want Impeachment, 76% Don’t Trust Dems And Believe Media Is Pushing The Sham

No One in American Wants Impeachment except the Far-left Socialist Democrats and their Corrupt Media. They hate President Trump because he is a winner. He beat them and he’s making America great again as he said he would.

The Democrats and their corrupt media are totally blinded by their rage and they don’t realize that no one is in favor of impeachment.

We reported a week ago that FOX News released a poll where they stated that 49% of Americans were for Trump Impeachment. But their polling was flawed. The real extrapolated results of the poll using an accurate proportion of Republicans, Democrats and Independents showed that only 30% of Americans are in favor of Trump’s Impeachment and they’re all Democrats.

Next, a few days ago we reported on another poll that was consistent with the results of our extrapolated FOX News poll.

Nearly three quarters of all Americans have little or no trust in the way that Schifty Schiff is running the impeachment process –

Heritage Action   Heritage_Action
 

You won’t hear this in the mainstream media: Nearly three fourths of Americans have little to no trust in the House Democrats’ handling of their impeachment process. 🤔

Today another poll was released with similar results.

Most Americans believe that the corrupt media is trying to help get President Trump impeached. Three-quarter of Republicans, half of independents and even a third of Democrats believe this to be the case. No one trusts Schifty Shiff or the corrupt media pushing his impeachment sham.

IT Guy@ITGuy1959
 

1- "Seventy-six percent (76%) of Republicans and a plurality (48%) of voters not affiliated with either major political party say most reporters are trying to help impeach Trump, a view shared by only 36% of Democrats."

Let's recast that last phrase 

Rasmussen Reports @Rasmussen_Poll
 

Most Say Media Working With Democrats to Impeach Trump... 

This is perhaps the worst gaffe in modern political history.

This Schiff Show does not have a happy ending for the Democrats. Even with the support of the entire corrupt fake news media, it’s a total sham and everyone knows it!

Ranking Member Nunes breaks down House Democrats' fake impeachment inquiry

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service