Question of the Day: Free Speech Areas in America????

While recently in Ft. Worth,Texas with my grandchildren at the circus, I saw something that disturbed me greatly. It was a space about 4x4 that had a sign that read free speech area!!!!  I was really taken back by it.

What do you all think about this and have you seen anything like it????

Views: 871


Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Eileen you gave the perfect response; we are domestic terrorists if we disagree with this administration.

actually the picture says it all........ freedom surrounded by bars!!!!

EJG , Misunderstood your sarc.

Thanks Evan Robert,  Perfect.

It's called censorship, and is not legally enforceable. It's up to us who care about our liberties to expose this kind of censorship as unconstitutional. I have not seen this as of yet. Maybe I will see this kind of censorship when I get to DC on May 16th, 2014 at Operation American Spring. The best thing that patriotic Americans can do is to arm ourselves with our laws of the constitution. There is a great way to understand the constitution; by signing up for a "Free College Course" offered by Hillsdale College at .

Like I said, if you really care and want to be informed, this knowledge will empower you. It's one thing to complain about your liberties, But it's a positive step to actually understand and be able to intelligently convey our true rights to freely speak about what concerns we have and to know what the laws allows. So I implore you to Arm Yourself with Knowledge, and it's free. 

Well Joseph, you are partly right. We the people know the Constitution, well some of us do, Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence, the government does not. Please read the second paragraph of the Declaration where it starts "We hold these truths to be self-evident.... I love the parts in the Bill of Rights about "Freedom of speech, to peaceably assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances. Notice I left out the religious part. That has all ready been destroyed.  And how about a "A WELL REGULATED MILITIA, being necessary to the SECURITY OF A FREE STATE, the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED and the Democrats are working hard to destroy that one. Seen what is happening in New York, Vermont, Connecticut? You are right in one respect, the American people need to ARM themselves, as in Nevada. The tea party in Boston Harbor is over and it is time for the Minute Men to take over, Concord and Lexington and something about a shot heard round the world.  God, Guts and Guns founded this nation and that is what it is going to take to restore it.

 One grenade will get you all Free Speech freaks.

Don't understand are you for or against free speech???

Silly question, the argument is that ALL of America is a FREE SPEECH ZONE! Get It?

You think I would hop over that fence and give up my career of being mentally constipated?

Often, the vagueness of a response can be read in many meanings or even in opposing meanings. I suggest he means that the idea of tightly containing a group makes the group very vulnerable to violent attack.


But if he promotes the idea that the taking out a group of free speech advocates in a confined area is desirable, then Glenn can choke on my teabag. To death.

See Glenn, my statements are examples of clear intentions. I am confident you understand.

Of course thats why they want U.S. TO STAND in ONE tiny place so wont take much to kill U.S. put the scare in rest watchi.g.JUST LIKE ALL COMMUNIESTIC COUNTRIES. I VOTE. O. VOMIT GO STAND IN THE LIttle area first. oh but he cant stand
There. His terrany is communistic. Woooo

All of America is supposed to be a free speech area!!




Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service