Former Congressman: FBI Says INDICT Hillary, Bad News If DOJ REFUSES

A former congressman is speaking out about the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton. The evidence against Hillary for transmitting top-secret documents via her personal email server is overwhelming. Most believe Hillary will dodge this FBI investigation, with an eleventh hour save by Attorney General Loretta Lynch. However, the former congressman states the FBI is ready for an indictment, and he goes on to say it will be bad news if the Department of Justice (DOJ) refuses to do so for one reason in particular.

tom_delay

Former Congressman Tom DeLay went on the record with Newsmax anchor Steve Malzberg on The Steve Malzberg Show. DeLay, no stranger to Washington prosecution, saw his political career sidelined by investigations, which led DeLay to eventually quit politics. DeLay knows the landscape of FBI investigations into big political figures, and no doubt the former Minority Leader has connections with the FBI. He state his sources within the FBI will leak the investigation to the public if A.G. Lynch refuses to indict Hillary.

The FBI is not giving any information on the ongoing investigation. The recent news that “above top-secret” documents were found on Hillary’s personal server now has all eyes turning toward the FBI to await their recommendation to Attorney General Lynch.

Here’s DeLay’s response to Steve Malzberg’s questions on Hillary’s email scandal and the FBI:

“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public.”


“One way or another, either she’s going to be indicted and that process begins, or we try her in the public eye with her campaign. One way or another, she’s going to have to face these charges.” — via Newsmax

The problem is the FBI is not sure where A.G. Lynch will stand if the FBI recommends indictment. Newsmax sums up DeLay’s comments:

The FBI is ready to indict Hillary Clinton, and if its recommendation isn’t followed by the U.S. attorney general, the agency’s investigators plan to blow the whistle and go public with their findings, former U.S. House Majority leader Tom DeLay tells Newsmax TV.

Most pundits are split on making a forecast on Hillary’s possible indictment. Reliable sources have reported the facts, and the evidence is so overwhelming that an indictment is the only logical conclusion.

The problem is, we are not talking about just any Washington politician. This is Hillary Clinton, wife of Bill– who was impeached but remained president. The Clinton’s weather hurricane winds of scandal only to come out of the storm still afloat. In other words, they fall in shit and come out smelling like a rose every time.

Will Obama allow A.G. Lynch to indict? Whatever the outcome, we hope the FBI investigators will leak the information to the public. The people deserve to know the truth about Hillary’s private server.

The minute Hillary used the server in her capacity as Secretary of State, that server became property of the United States. It became the property of the citizen’s of the United States. However, the ball will be in Lynch’s court, it seems. Will she be in the culture of corruption, or will she stand for truth?

The people of this nation have lost hope that our own top law enforcement agency, the Department of Justice, stands for anything but corruption. So we say, bring us back to the “justice for all” we deserve.

Views: 839

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

        GET THE INFO OUT !!

Hey she will have a ball with all those prisoners and she we will get her wish and be the Quine Bitch or somebody's Bitch !

Nothing will happen to Hillary. 

Ditto! As long as Bill Clinton is alive she will not go to jail.

@Mary Ann West,

Bill is not looking all that healthy these days.  I can't help but wonder if he picked up a little something extra with his philandering escapades?   

if what she does and was not a clear violation of the law because she's an ex-first lady.  We need to burn the White House down.  King Obama has no business not indicting that radical female that thinks that she's about the law.  And maybe until we can get our hands on our own Justice Department's in our state, just maybe we're going to have to do some bloodletting.  The idea that the FBI can come into our state and stop our people on other than federal ground and murder someone who has been setting on federal ground protest is not unconstitutional and because they had guns is not unconstitutional.  Both of these things are guarded under our Constitution.  And the idea that somebody can go to an Academy and come out a beast to the community is just wrong.  It is the citizens, not the government that you're supposed to starve and protect.  We pay your pay check.  When our taxes, and it's not to lead us around by the nose or bully us

He is so rotten on the inside, it is coming right on out.

No do not indite her.  Wait until we have a new president.  This one will pardon her in one minute, if for no other reason than to keep her from testifying under oath

The Clinton machine has as much dirt on Obama as he has on them. If she is indicted Obama goes down with her. So he has to protect her for his own sake.

no you're wrong, indite her and slow walker through the court system until Obama is out of office and then bring her before the bench and strap her to a chair.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Fact Check:   'Joe Biden Claims ‘We Didn’t Lock People Up In Cages’

CLAIM: Former Vice President Joe Biden claimed, on immigration: “We didn’t lock people up in cages.”

VERDICT: FALSE. The “cages” were built by the Obama-Biden administration.

Univision moderator Jorge Ramos asked Biden at the third Democrat debate at Texas Southern University in Houston, Texas, why Latinos should trust him after the Obama administration continued deporting “undocumented immigrants.”

Biden claimed that the Obama administration’s policies were more humane than those of President Donald Trump: “We didn’t lock people up in cages,” he said.

In fact, the “cages” were built by the Obama administration to deal with a surge of unaccompanied minors who crossed the border illegally in 2014.

Originally, the Obama administration was “warehousing” children — literally — in overwhelmed Border Patrol facilities. Breitbart News broke the story of the surge, which was partly triggered by Obama’s policy of allowing illegal alien children who entered the country as minors to stay in the country (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA).

Above image credit: AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, Pool, File

The above photo was published by the Associated Press in June 2014, and the photo below is of Obama’s Secretary of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson, touring a Border Patrol facility with “cages.”


Above: Border Patrol officers escort Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and Gov. Jan Brewer through the department’s Nogales processing facility for immigrant children. (Photo courtesy Barry Bahler/Department of Homeland Security)

The “cages” are chain-link enclosures in Border Patrol processing facilities that are meant to protect children from adults in custody. They are not permanent accommodations.

In mid-2018, as the Trump administration began enforcing a “zero tolerance” policy that stopped the “catch-and-release” policy of letting illegal aliens go after they were arrested. Detaining adults and children meant that children had to be processed separately; the enclosures prevented adults from harming children.

As Breitbart News reported at the time, children were not housed in “cages.” They were processed and then taken to shelters, where they were given medical care, toiletries, education, recreation, and counseling, and where staff attempted to find relatives or sponsors to whom they could be released.

Democrats began tweeting images of “kids in cages” to condemn the Trump administration. Journalists, too, shared those images.

One problem: they were taken during the Obama administration.

Public outrage at the images led President Trump to end the policy, and require families to be detained together.

Democrats keep repeating the mistake, however: in July, they had to delete a tweet that used an image from the Obama era and cited the “inhumane treatment” of children by the Trump administration.

Republicans argue that not detaining illegal aliens is actually the cruel policy, because it encourages migrants to undertake a dangerous journey, often guided by cartels and smugglers.

As Breitbart News’ Alana Mastrangelo noted recently:

But what’s worse than “cages,” however, are reports of migrant children also being handed over to human traffickers during the Obama administration — while Biden was vice president — according to the New York Times. Between October 2013 and July 2015 alone, nearly 80,000 unaccompanied children from Central American countries were detained by U.S. authorities.

It remains unclear how many of the tens of thousands of children were handed over to human traffickers — including sex traffickers — during that span of nearly two years, as those cases are reportedly not tracked.

“Others were ransomed by the very smugglers to whom their families paid thousands of dollars to sneak them into the United States,” reported the New York Times in 2015, during Obama’s presidency and Biden’s vice presidency. “Some lost limbs during the journey or found themselves sold into sexual slavery.”

Biden told voters in South Carolina last month that he would close all border detention facilities, guaranteeing that the migrant flow would continue.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service