First Female Somali Muslim Legislator: Islamic Jihad Murderers Should Get Paid From Life Insurance Policies

Image result for Ilhan Omar

America’s first female Somali Muslim legislator was only one of two people to vote against a bill that would allow life insurance companies to deny a payout to beneficiaries of terrorists killed while attacking Americans.

Ilhan Omar, 34, came to America as a refugee from Somalia. She was elected in 2016 in the state of Minnesota.

“From a refugee camp to the State Capitol with intelligence and insight,” said former Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak. “This is a wonderful story to tell as Americans, and a great source of pride for the state of Minnesota’s open arms.”

On Thursday, Omar, along with another member of the Minnesota House, voted against HF 1397, which would allow life insurance companies to not pay beneficiaries of terrorists who died while in the process of attacking Americans.

The bill was introduced by Rep. Joe Hoppe (R-Chaska) in response to San Bernardino jihadi Syed Farook, who had insurance policies worth $275,000. Farook was accused of a mass shooting at a Christmas party in 2015 that left 14 people dead and 22 injured. Some sources claimed the shooting was done by three men rather than the official story of Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik.

The bill is pretty straightforward.

A bill for an act relating to life insurance; limitation on payments to beneficiaries of persons furthering terrorism; amending Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 61A.09, by adding
a subdivision.


Section 1.

Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 61A.09, is amended by adding a subdivision
to read:

Subd. 5.

Limitation on payment due to furtherance of terrorism.

(a) For purposes
of this subdivision, “further terrorism” has the meaning given in section 609.714.

(b) Notwithstanding section 61A.03, subdivision 1, paragraph (c), a policy of group life
insurance issued for delivery in this state may limit payment to a beneficiary to the amount
of premiums that have been paid to the insurer under the policy if the insured’s death occurs
directly or indirectly as a result of the insured’s furtherance of terrorism.

(c) Conviction of a crime in violation of section 609.714 is not necessary for any court
of competent jurisdiction to determine by a preponderance of evidence whether a terrorist
act has occurred for the purpose of this section.

Democratic Rep. Debra Hilstrom said the bill’s goal “is to make certain that folks don’t benefit [from terrorism] and this limits the beneficiary to the premiums that were paid in. It limits the exposure for the insurance company when someone is committing an act of terrorism.”

That seems to be a fairly straightforward understanding of the bill.

Debra Anderson, leader of the ACT For America chapter in Minnesota, said, “U.S. life insurance policies that pay out to the families of terrorists reminds me of Muslim regions, such as Palestine, that also make ‘life insurance’ payments to the families of jihadists who kill in the name of Allah.”

She went on to claim that Omar’s vote was “reprehensible” and demonstrates where her allegiances lie.

Additionally, Omar, like Muslim congressman Keith Ellison, also from Minnesota, supports LGBT rights and abortion rights.

Leo Hohmann at WND reports on what else Omar has been engaged in since she took office. He writes, “Since her election as a legislator, she:

  • Opposed a bill to limit mass protests designed to disrupt streets, train service and airport access.
  • Has been given her own Muslim Barbie icon, the “Hijarbie.”
  • Visited her native Somalia to push for women’s leadership, raising the question of why Somali “refugees” are still pouring into the U.S. and other Western countries if the country is safe enough for former refugees to return and lobby the government for pet causes.
  • Traveled to Washington, D.C., in December for a reported White House visit when she made a Facebook post complaining about a cab driver who taunted her with “sexist and Islamophobic” comments. She said he threatened to pull off her hijab and called her “ISIS,” yet she never filed a police report. In response to an inquiry on her Facebook page, Omar said she planned to file a report once she returned to Minneapolis, adding that she did not feel safe enough to say anything at the moment. The reply did not say whether the report would be with police, the cabdriver’s employer or possibly a civil rights organization.”

Thankfully, the bill was passed 127-2. That gives some hope for the future, but the people of Minnesota should seriously consider her actions and her votes and impeach her and remove her from office.

On what planet is this a good idea?  Another perfect example of why we should not have muslims in ANY part of our government or law...

Image result for no muslims in american government cartoon

Views: 26

Reply to This




Rush Limbaugh Explains How Robert Mueller
Will Attempt To Financially Destroy President Trump

 Special Counsel Robert Mueller has crossed President Trump’s “red line” after issuing a subpoena for documents related to the Trump Organization’s business dealings with Russia.

New York Times reports:

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has subpoenaed the Trump Organization to turn over documents, including some related to Russia, according to two people briefed on the matter. The order is the first known time that the special counsel demanded documents directly related to President Trump’s businesses, bringing the investigation closer to the president. […] The Trump Organization has said that it never had real estate holdings in Russia, but witnesses recently interviewed by Mr. Mueller have been asked about a possible real estate deal in Moscow. In 2015, a longtime business associate of Mr. Trump’s emailed Mr. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen at his Trump Organization account claiming he had ties to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and said that building a Trump Tower in Moscow would help Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign.

Radio host Rush Limbaugh theorized on his program Friday that one of Mueller’s true objectives is to financially destroy President Trump.

Partial transcript via Breitbart News:

And these requests, the subpoena for documents from the Trump Organization, I ask you again, what has that to do with the campaign and with collusion and with the Russians? They’ve already been looking into Trump business in Russia with the Miss, what is it, USA, whatever his pageant is.

Do you all remember during the early days of the campaign there was news that Trump, in a tax return something like 20 years ago, took a $900 million deduction that was granted and survived an audit by the IRS? Now, I forget the details. It had to do with losses that he had incurred in that year in building things. It was around 900 or $920 million deduction. I’ll never forget when it was reported because most people will never come close to ever having that in a lifetime, and to have a guy personally write that much off?

Anyway, I think Mueller wants that $920 million back. I think Mueller wants to prove that that was a faulty deduction. I think that they want to go back, they want to get Trump’s tax returns because they want to nullify that $900 million deduction, and then they want to collect 20 years of interest and penalties and wipe Trump out.

In the meantime, President Trump’s lawyers are in the process of negotiating with special counsel Robert Mueller to bring the Russia probe to an end, reports Rebecca Ballhaus and Peter Nicholas of the Wall Street Journal.

Mueller’s tentacles continue to reach further and further.

CNN reported that investigators are attempting to determine whether former Blackwater chief Erik Prince misled the  House Intelligence Committee about a meeting he had in Seychelles in January of 2017.

Prince is accused of using the meeting as an opportunity to establish a secret back channel with Russia.

Fox News’ Catherine Herridge spoke with one of President Trump’s personal lawyers about the new subpoena request by Special Counsel Mueller.

According to Herridge, Trump’s lawyer was unaware of the subpoena and said it may be a ‘wrap up’ subpoena or ‘clean up’ subpoena which may signal the end of the investigation.


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service