FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration Buying 'Fresh' Baby Parts

 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is using federal tax dollars to create a demand for human body parts from aborted babies by signing a contract to acquire “fresh” fetal tissue to transplant into “humanized mice.”

  In 2015, an independent undercover investigation produced a series of videos.... The revelations prompted congressional inquiries and a Justice Department investigation. House Republicans formed a select investigative panel that spent 15 months examining the issue and issued a 471-page report but no charges.

FDA committed to ‘highest ethical standards’

The FDA confirmed of CNSNews.com that the federal government signed the contract, but the agency refused to answer 17 other questions, offering instead a three-paragraph statement.

 One of the questions the FDA refused to answer was the “total number of babies expected to donate their tissue to the FDA to create humanized mice during the year-long duration of the contract.” CNSNews.com also asked whether or not the mothers were made aware that the body parts were being used for such research.

 The FDA, in its statement, emphasized it was committed to making certain its research followed “all legal requirements” and met “the highest ethical standards.”

  The further implication, points out CNSNews.com, is that the FDA has an interest in the continuation of legalized abortions at a stage of pregnancy in which the body parts can be retrieved.

 Citing information published by the FDA and the General Services Administration, CNSNews.com said the ultimate objective of the new $15,900 contract, signed July 25, is to help create laboratory mice that will have a functioning “human immune system.”

 The Congressional Research Service confirmed that the “fetal tissue used in research is obtained from elective abortions.”

 The House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives was presented in 2016 with with a background paper from Harvard University explaining that mice with human immune systems “are engineered to this condition only by means of the use of human fetal material” and that this material can only come from aborted babies not from miscarriages.

“At the FDA, research involving human fetal tissue accounts for a very small fraction of the FDA’s total research and has been used in situations where it is critical to understanding how the human immune system responds to certain drugs and biologics,” the statement said. “This work has led to a better understanding of a number of conditions and diseases that affect millions of Americans.”

 The agency said its researchers “obtain fetal tissue from a non-profit Tissue Procurement Organization (TPO) that have [sic] provided assurances that they are in compliance with all applicable legal requirements, including relevant provisions relating to research involving human fetal tissue.”

“FDA is not involved in the TPO’s sourcing of the tissue,” it said.

 Since 2012, according to the GSA’s Federal Procurement Data System, the FDA has signed eight contracts with ABR, including the one signed July 25, CNSNews.com said.

 Seven of the contracts expressly cite “Humanized Mice,” “Human Fetal Tissue” or “Tissue Procurement for Humanized Mice” in the contract’s “description of requirement.” The eighth simply says: “Human Tissue.”

https://www.wnd.com/2018/08/fda-buying-fresh-baby-parts/

Views: 54

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Food and Drug Administration into baby parts, figures.

This ought to be a class action lawsuit by WE the PEOPLE.

 Trump needs to kick some butt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service