Anyone who has a DACA permit expiring between now and March 5, 2018, can apply for a two-year renewal.Even those DACA recipients whose DACA permits expires after March 5, will be eligible for legal status for another two-plus year.

In other words, Pres. Trump is giving Congress what it wants most, the DACA amnesty decision to be postponed until AFTER the 2018 election. 

But all is not lost. I see yesterday's Fox News article* supporting what I have been calling for in relation to any DACA amnesty: birthright citizenship reform. And here's the best part: it can be addressed without a constitutional amendment, at least that's what Herry Ried said back in his S. 1351 (103rd): Immigration Stabilization Act of 1993, under TITLE X--CITIZENSHIP

SEC. 1001. BASIS OF CITIZENSHIP CLARIFIED.

"In the exercise of its powers under section 5 of the Fourteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Congress has determined and hereby declares that any person born after the date of enactment of this title to a mother who is neither a citizen of the United States nor admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident, and which person is a national or citizen of another country of which either of his or her natural parents is a national or citizen, or is entitled upon application to become a national or citizen of such country, shall be considered as born subject to the jurisdiction of that foreign country and not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States within the meaning of section 1 of such Article and shall therefore not be a citizen of the United States or of any State solely by reason of physical presence within the United States at the moment of birth."

I agree. If Congress is going to offer DACA amnesty now to these lawbreaking illegal aliens, the very least they can do for their fellow law-abiding citizens in return is to restrict birthright U.S. citizenship to only those born exclusively under U.S. sovereignty, with no foreign allegiances or attachments at birth to ensure this type of breach of law doesn't happen again, and to finally put an end to the ludicrous situation where the offspring born here of illegal aliens are considered natural born U.S. citizens at birth.

* Source: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/04/trump-gop-should-keep-dac...

Views: 350

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

SO LITTLE SEAN PENN says Trump is an enemy of Mankind.....?

This little man has much to say about the President but WHO IS SEAN PENN, ANYWAY????

The real enemy of Mankind is Cretin and subhuman Barrack Obama, Not Donald Trump!


’Tis but the empty sound of fury, unleashed in the souls of tyrants… that corrupt words destroy the community of man; with the tongue men set afire civilization and bring captive millions. Words, steeped with ill will, sooner beget terror in the hearts of men than a sword. For with steel, men are dispatched and soon are forgotten, but with words history is written and rewritten, defining the very soul of men and nations.' Nelson

Sean Penn is an empty vessel... a broken cistern whose water has long emptied into the abyss ...whose soul lacks understanding... a wondering star set adrift in a sea of darkness... His voice speaks of ill winds and the narratives of the lost and confused... only the fool listens to the idle banter of such men...

You have said a MOUTH FULL IN FEW WORDS---A TRUE BLUE STATEMENT

Lets try here, RONALD, I AM HOPING MAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

One more Time Ronald,

 I am going to ask you something, its about NATO and OTAN, we all ready know that the UK was in a joint file sharing program with the FISA Courts, and the NSA with Americans privet information, they were also spying on Trump, anyway, to the best of your knowledge, was NATO and OTAN involved in spying on Americans and President Trump?

HMMMM? Well??? Was They ??????

When Tif first found out about this, all to many disrespected her, so, in truth you can not make up this kind of Bullshi* !! ........LMAO

https://www.google.com/search?q=Magna+Carta+of+administrative+law%2...

Once more, I can not say why the post failed, but not this time.

When Tif first found out about this, all to many disrespected her, so, in truth you can not make up this kind of Bullshi* !!

https://www.google.com/search?q=Magna+Carta+of+administrative+law%2...

So Tif's DACA presentations are 100% correct.

No one is disrespecting Tif ... it is not disrespectful to cordially disagree.  Tif is a big girl and should be capable of taking constructive criticism without taking offense.  Life is to short to let others drive your emotions... The facts in this matter speak for themselves... one should do a better job of researching, in order to avoid taking a position that is untenable. 

You should take time to read before you engage your mouth, Mr. Nelson.

You may want to follow your own advice Hank...  The Lord gave us the benefit of his wisdom concerning dealing with individuals like you:

Proverbs 9:8 8 "Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you." 

Which is it Hank ... love or hate that runs in your veins? 

Get your DACA on man, get it on, DAMN I think I could write a Bullshit Song, out of this, Ge your DACA On, lets Have A Magna Carta DACA...Yea Man, Get Your DACA On.

 Mr. Nelson, on a serous note, if I served under you in the mlitary ths would be my reply to the CO In Charge, You Sir. I never had much faith iin the CIA, and CFR, and German's Army NATO, not worried about the Twinkies French OTAN, gay boys, I can display my salute to all of the members of the UN, and supporters, oh yea, the seats of the UN, Democracy Of The DNC.

Have a Nice Day...

Those who think Magana Carta is connected to DACA are hallucinating... Just what is the connection to a 800 year old charter of rights granted by the King of England to his vassal Barons?


Magana Carta was and remains one of the pivotal moments in history... establishing individual rights thru the rule of law... It was revolutionary in that it declared the sovereign (king) to be subject to the rule of law and documented the liberties held by “free men,” Magna Carta provided the foundation for individual rights in Anglo-American jurisprudence and remains a sterling example of Anglo law and their love of liberty. It is a document humanity can all be proud of... not some distorted tale of betrayal or oppression... tied to the most despicable actions of the left and its fascist allies.


Be outraged but understand all the rage in the world does not change History...  all free men owe a debt to those who established Magna Carta, a corner stone for liberty, upon which government is limited, and individual liberty is extended: Thru the rule of law and the recognition of humanities, God given, right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  Attacks on Magna Carta, and its reckless demeaning, are not helpful to the cause of liberty.

See: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Magna-Carta

So are you Mr. Nelson, surrounded by deception ... advisors who are members of the Establishment and DEEP STATE, of the British Empire.

"Those who think Magana Carta is connected to DACA are hallucinating... Just what is the connection to a 800 year old charter of rights granted by the King of England to his vassal Barons?"

 TAKE IT UP WITH THEM- Mr. Nelson, you know the Left, the Democrat Party.

Now Hurry along, we don't want you to miss the boat.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service