Anyone who has a DACA permit expiring between now and March 5, 2018, can apply for a two-year renewal.Even those DACA recipients whose DACA permits expires after March 5, will be eligible for legal status for another two-plus year.

In other words, Pres. Trump is giving Congress what it wants most, the DACA amnesty decision to be postponed until AFTER the 2018 election. 

But all is not lost. I see yesterday's Fox News article* supporting what I have been calling for in relation to any DACA amnesty: birthright citizenship reform. And here's the best part: it can be addressed without a constitutional amendment, at least that's what Herry Ried said back in his S. 1351 (103rd): Immigration Stabilization Act of 1993, under TITLE X--CITIZENSHIP

SEC. 1001. BASIS OF CITIZENSHIP CLARIFIED.

"In the exercise of its powers under section 5 of the Fourteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Congress has determined and hereby declares that any person born after the date of enactment of this title to a mother who is neither a citizen of the United States nor admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident, and which person is a national or citizen of another country of which either of his or her natural parents is a national or citizen, or is entitled upon application to become a national or citizen of such country, shall be considered as born subject to the jurisdiction of that foreign country and not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States within the meaning of section 1 of such Article and shall therefore not be a citizen of the United States or of any State solely by reason of physical presence within the United States at the moment of birth."

I agree. If Congress is going to offer DACA amnesty now to these lawbreaking illegal aliens, the very least they can do for their fellow law-abiding citizens in return is to restrict birthright U.S. citizenship to only those born exclusively under U.S. sovereignty, with no foreign allegiances or attachments at birth to ensure this type of breach of law doesn't happen again, and to finally put an end to the ludicrous situation where the offspring born here of illegal aliens are considered natural born U.S. citizens at birth.

* Source: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/04/trump-gop-should-keep-dac...

Views: 309

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The United Nation's Immigration policies are not binding upon the United States... How many times do you need to be informed before you understand: 

The US is a Constitutional Republic, a sovereign Nation which prohibits foreign rule or interference from external sovereign entities.  The UN has no lawful jurisdiction over the US Government.... except by Treaty...  there are few Treaties with the UN... most regulate international trade. 

 Just do not believe ya, sorry, Congress says one thing, the UN states another, and by the way why does the UN Seats have a majority holders of the DNC?

 Why did the DNC help build the UN? And by the way what the heck was the RNC doing, oh thats right they were Celebrating Christmas. When the Fed took over our country, and thats odd because thats when the UN started pushing UN Policies for Immigration. So America would be more of a proper mix of different people from the world.

 Oh by the way The British Empire no longer holds any seats at the UN, like WOW9/11, what happened.

 Thats right the Islamic States took over the England's Government Parliament Positions.

 Now thats cute, sorry Ronald,but don't believe ya.

Just what do you believe Tif... that international law and the UN dictate US policy? The UN is a useless body of malcontents looking for a free lunch... they have no enforcement powers and the laws they pass don't... I repeat don't take precedent over US Law or our Constitution...

The US should remain in the UN for one reason... to VETO all the crap they put out and too foil their subversive plans for a one world government.  The US can't do that from the outside... they must remain a permanent member of the Security Counsel with the power to Veto any acts passed by the UN... which don't meet our approval.

Then like Hank stated, if the DNC takes Office, they will VETO again, its all BS! except this: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/first-uranium-one-indictme...

LOL Tif

Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

We must have that veto for Israel's sake, and to know what they are up to because it is never good. Lying, propagandists, rapist pedophiles.

The beauty of staying in is that opportunities will come up to slap them silly, just like Trump does.

Exactly!

ONCE AGAIN-- MEMO TO DONALD J TRUMP: #1) Remember your campaign promises Donald.

Rid America of DACA, Chain Migration AND the LOTTERY if IMMIGRANTS. PLEASE ISSUE FEWER GREEN CARDS TOO! DO NOT LISTEN TO JEFF FLAKE-etal on DACA, they want to destroy America.

BUILD THAT WALL DONALD AND MAKE ICE's JOB MUCH EASIER

Repeal  OBAMA CARE IN FULL!

GET RID OF MS-13 EVERYWHERE!

PUT OBAMA, COMEY, HILLARY, LORETTA LYNCH ERIC HOLDER AND OBAMA's IRS Coneys in PRISON! ABOVE ALL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

SO OBAMA SAID: People who watch Fox news live on another planet---

Him saying that is equal to what Hillary said about TRUMP VOTERS BEING A DESPICABLE LOT and now you know where the mind of a deranged liberal dwells---in the SWAMPY GUTTER!

ONLY A CRETIN-DEGENERATE, A SUBHUMAN SPECIES WOULD SAY THAT: AND---OBAMA WANTS A 3rd TERM??

DREAM ON!

He wants to govern all yet lumps a majority of this country into a group that despises his face on TV. 

HE'S SUBHUMAN I TELL YOU. One who beats his chest when He has done nothing for AMERICA. HE NEEDS ALL REMNANTS OF HIS EXISTENCE IN THE WHITE HOUSE WIPED FROM EARTH'S HISTORY. 

Sorry Correction--- DEPLORABLE 'S

BUT

DESPICABLE could have been in there too!

Maxine Waters says Trump is a LIAR....HMmmmmm SOooo.....What does she call Lying Obama since he lied more then any president in History???

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service