Anyone who has a DACA permit expiring between now and March 5, 2018, can apply for a two-year renewal.Even those DACA recipients whose DACA permits expires after March 5, will be eligible for legal status for another two-plus year.

In other words, Pres. Trump is giving Congress what it wants most, the DACA amnesty decision to be postponed until AFTER the 2018 election. 

But all is not lost. I see yesterday's Fox News article* supporting what I have been calling for in relation to any DACA amnesty: birthright citizenship reform. And here's the best part: it can be addressed without a constitutional amendment, at least that's what Herry Ried said back in his S. 1351 (103rd): Immigration Stabilization Act of 1993, under TITLE X--CITIZENSHIP

SEC. 1001. BASIS OF CITIZENSHIP CLARIFIED.

"In the exercise of its powers under section 5 of the Fourteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Congress has determined and hereby declares that any person born after the date of enactment of this title to a mother who is neither a citizen of the United States nor admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident, and which person is a national or citizen of another country of which either of his or her natural parents is a national or citizen, or is entitled upon application to become a national or citizen of such country, shall be considered as born subject to the jurisdiction of that foreign country and not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States within the meaning of section 1 of such Article and shall therefore not be a citizen of the United States or of any State solely by reason of physical presence within the United States at the moment of birth."

I agree. If Congress is going to offer DACA amnesty now to these lawbreaking illegal aliens, the very least they can do for their fellow law-abiding citizens in return is to restrict birthright U.S. citizenship to only those born exclusively under U.S. sovereignty, with no foreign allegiances or attachments at birth to ensure this type of breach of law doesn't happen again, and to finally put an end to the ludicrous situation where the offspring born here of illegal aliens are considered natural born U.S. citizens at birth.

* Source: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/04/trump-gop-should-keep-dac...

Views: 334

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The United Nation's Immigration policies are not binding upon the United States... How many times do you need to be informed before you understand: 

The US is a Constitutional Republic, a sovereign Nation which prohibits foreign rule or interference from external sovereign entities.  The UN has no lawful jurisdiction over the US Government.... except by Treaty...  there are few Treaties with the UN... most regulate international trade. 

 Just do not believe ya, sorry, Congress says one thing, the UN states another, and by the way why does the UN Seats have a majority holders of the DNC?

 Why did the DNC help build the UN? And by the way what the heck was the RNC doing, oh thats right they were Celebrating Christmas. When the Fed took over our country, and thats odd because thats when the UN started pushing UN Policies for Immigration. So America would be more of a proper mix of different people from the world.

 Oh by the way The British Empire no longer holds any seats at the UN, like WOW9/11, what happened.

 Thats right the Islamic States took over the England's Government Parliament Positions.

 Now thats cute, sorry Ronald,but don't believe ya.

Just what do you believe Tif... that international law and the UN dictate US policy? The UN is a useless body of malcontents looking for a free lunch... they have no enforcement powers and the laws they pass don't... I repeat don't take precedent over US Law or our Constitution...

The US should remain in the UN for one reason... to VETO all the crap they put out and too foil their subversive plans for a one world government.  The US can't do that from the outside... they must remain a permanent member of the Security Counsel with the power to Veto any acts passed by the UN... which don't meet our approval.

Then like Hank stated, if the DNC takes Office, they will VETO again, its all BS! except this: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/first-uranium-one-indictme...

LOL Tif

Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

We must have that veto for Israel's sake, and to know what they are up to because it is never good. Lying, propagandists, rapist pedophiles.

The beauty of staying in is that opportunities will come up to slap them silly, just like Trump does.

Exactly!

ONCE AGAIN-- MEMO TO DONALD J TRUMP: #1) Remember your campaign promises Donald.

Rid America of DACA, Chain Migration AND the LOTTERY if IMMIGRANTS. PLEASE ISSUE FEWER GREEN CARDS TOO! DO NOT LISTEN TO JEFF FLAKE-etal on DACA, they want to destroy America.

BUILD THAT WALL DONALD AND MAKE ICE's JOB MUCH EASIER

Repeal  OBAMA CARE IN FULL!

GET RID OF MS-13 EVERYWHERE!

PUT OBAMA, COMEY, HILLARY, LORETTA LYNCH ERIC HOLDER AND OBAMA's IRS Coneys in PRISON! ABOVE ALL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

SO OBAMA SAID: People who watch Fox news live on another planet---

Him saying that is equal to what Hillary said about TRUMP VOTERS BEING A DESPICABLE LOT and now you know where the mind of a deranged liberal dwells---in the SWAMPY GUTTER!

ONLY A CRETIN-DEGENERATE, A SUBHUMAN SPECIES WOULD SAY THAT: AND---OBAMA WANTS A 3rd TERM??

DREAM ON!

He wants to govern all yet lumps a majority of this country into a group that despises his face on TV. 

HE'S SUBHUMAN I TELL YOU. One who beats his chest when He has done nothing for AMERICA. HE NEEDS ALL REMNANTS OF HIS EXISTENCE IN THE WHITE HOUSE WIPED FROM EARTH'S HISTORY. 

Sorry Correction--- DEPLORABLE 'S

BUT

DESPICABLE could have been in there too!

Maxine Waters says Trump is a LIAR....HMmmmmm SOooo.....What does she call Lying Obama since he lied more then any president in History???

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa BensonPolitical Cartoons by Henry Payne

ALERT ALERT

‘Watch: Female HS Student Says She ‘Felt Violated’ After Seeing Trans Student’s Penis In Locker Room

“I could tell that he was wearing women’s underwear and what was underneath it”

 A Pennsylvania student attending Honesdale High School has filed a complaint with the United States Department of Education Office of Civil Rights after her school administrators allowed a trans woman, a biological male who feels he is a woman, to dress and undress in the female locker room.

The student said she felt violated and scared when she looked across the aisle in the locker room to discover a member of the opposite sex in his underwear. In a video released by her legal team, she says it was obvious he was biologically male, as she “could tell that he was wearing women’s underwear and what was underneath it.”

“It was the first period, and I had gym class,” said the student, “And I walked in with all my friends, and while I was putting on my pants, I heard a man’s voice, so I turned around, and he’s standing there on the opposite aisle looking at me.”

“I glanced down and I could tell that he was wearing women’s underwear, and what was beneath it.”

She added that having a man apparently gawking at her while in various stages of undress made her feel unsafe.

“When I knew that a man was looking at me, I felt very violated, and very scared,” she said. “Especially looking at me while I am getting dressed.”

Her attorney said that this should be considered a form of sexual harassment in the eyes of the law.

“Opening up restrooms and locker room facilities to members of the opposite sex is sexual harassment,” said Andrea Shaw, the high school student’s attorney, “And like many forms of sexual harassment the girls in this school have little power over their situation.”

The attorney also notes that the school’s only attempt to remedy the situation was to allow the female high school student to wait to change until the biologically male student was finished, making her chronically late to gym class.

According to local media, the school district’s superintendent claims he is not able to comment on the case, but stated that the school is following the letter of the law. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is expected to take up the case, otherwise biologically male students will continue to be allowed to dress and undress with biologically females.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service