Anyone who has a DACA permit expiring between now and March 5, 2018, can apply for a two-year renewal.Even those DACA recipients whose DACA permits expires after March 5, will be eligible for legal status for another two-plus year.

In other words, Pres. Trump is giving Congress what it wants most, the DACA amnesty decision to be postponed until AFTER the 2018 election. 

But all is not lost. I see yesterday's Fox News article* supporting what I have been calling for in relation to any DACA amnesty: birthright citizenship reform. And here's the best part: it can be addressed without a constitutional amendment, at least that's what Herry Ried said back in his S. 1351 (103rd): Immigration Stabilization Act of 1993, under TITLE X--CITIZENSHIP

SEC. 1001. BASIS OF CITIZENSHIP CLARIFIED.

"In the exercise of its powers under section 5 of the Fourteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Congress has determined and hereby declares that any person born after the date of enactment of this title to a mother who is neither a citizen of the United States nor admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident, and which person is a national or citizen of another country of which either of his or her natural parents is a national or citizen, or is entitled upon application to become a national or citizen of such country, shall be considered as born subject to the jurisdiction of that foreign country and not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States within the meaning of section 1 of such Article and shall therefore not be a citizen of the United States or of any State solely by reason of physical presence within the United States at the moment of birth."

I agree. If Congress is going to offer DACA amnesty now to these lawbreaking illegal aliens, the very least they can do for their fellow law-abiding citizens in return is to restrict birthright U.S. citizenship to only those born exclusively under U.S. sovereignty, with no foreign allegiances or attachments at birth to ensure this type of breach of law doesn't happen again, and to finally put an end to the ludicrous situation where the offspring born here of illegal aliens are considered natural born U.S. citizens at birth.

* Source: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/04/trump-gop-should-keep-dac...

Views: 277

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

6-Month delay on rescinding
1. Attorney General Jeff Sessions held a press conference today where he announced a 6-month delay on rescinding DACA.
[Phasing out the program over a 6-month period is a more appropriat...

2. This delay places the future of immigrationsmatters related to DREAMers squarely in the hands of Congress. 
[But Daniel Horowitz says enough about DACA; where is the "sympathy...

See how simple and clean it really is. No bull, no sympathy, just the law. We are citizens. they are not.

Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)

"Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."
Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):
A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:
* assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or
* encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or
* knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.

Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief.

The existing law is clear... we don't need to study anything other than the laws on the books.  Start deporting these individuals and arresting US citizens who are aiding and abetting... criminally harboring these fugitives from justice.

So why is the act itself only a civil violation? I am not at all sure about the dynamics, but perhaps an upgrade to a 3rd felony would act as a stronger deterrent? Afterall, we are presently seeing an upswing in illegal crossings from recent years.

US Attorneys and DOJ... have decided not to pursue the felonies associated with harboring illegal aliens.

The MSM and Establishments narrative deliberately ignores the CRIMINAL citations in the current law... The public is being deceived.  The national narrative ignores and underplays the criminal actions available using the current law... they act as if they doesn't exist... when, the law is clear regarding the criminal actions by those aiding and abetting illegal aliens.

We have a corrupt system of government... highly corrupt... one that ignores the laws they don't like and enforces Executive Orders as if they were viable law. Up is down and down is up... Personally David ... I don't know how America can recover without major upheaval in our government.. possibly resulting in civil war. 

The Left is without moral restraint... they have no conscience and live by their moto... by any means necessary.  They believe the law is subject to selective prosecution and enforcement as they see fit... 'Prosecutorial discretion' is in fact illegal... It is the open manifestation of 'Misprision of a Felony'... a federal felony... committed by failing to enforce the laws of the U.S.

Mr. Nelson,

 I was just looking over some comments, you stated,"The existing law is clear... we don't need to study anything other than the laws on the books."

The Legal Flaw With Ditching DACA Administrative Procedure Act Magn...

The Legal Flaw With Ditching DACA Administrative Procedure Act Magna Carta: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/the-legal-flaw-with-ditchi...

DACA has no legal standing... it is in violation of Statutory Law... DACA violates the current Immigration and naturalization act(s) of 1952, 65, and 68, as amended. DACA stands overtly in opposition to these laws.  See: http://www.history.com/topics/us-immigration-since-1965

Additionally, the Immigration Reform Act in 1986 attempted to address many of our current immigration issues by providing better enforcement of immigration policies and creating more ways to seek legal entry to the US. The act included two amnesty programs for unauthorized aliens, and collectively granted amnesty to more than 3 million illegal aliens...

Amnesty is not new in Americas... It has proven to be an ineffective firewall against future illegal immigration. Internal enforcement of our immigration law, as they exist, is th only method proven to stop illegal immigration.  Enforcement of our borders and deportation are the most effective means for stopping and removing illegal aliens found in our society.

"Illegal immigration is wrong."...Charles Schumer 2009

In a major address at the 6th Annual Immigration Law and Policy Conference sponsored by MPI, Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., and Georgetown University Law Center, Senate Immigration Subcommittee Chairman Charles Schumer outlined the seven principles he said will form the basis for the immigration legislation he intends to introduce by this fall.

Members of the Establishment in both political parties have written off the current immigration laws as obsolete and in fact are willfully violating them... Both Administrations (Obama / Trump) and Congress's have failed to enforce the law.  They both actively pursuing policies that ... 'go around current law and the Congress' ... because, neither have the votes to promote their agenda...YET!

America is being dragged into a new world order....   America's institutions, and men like Sen. Schumer, are failing in loyalty to the US Constitution. Instead, these unfaithful men and their institutions have signed on to a New World Order.  These Globalist Politicians are traitors and need to be dealt with as such. 

The People are being deceived... and fed a daily diet of deceit and misdirection.  The elite in America continue to rape the US Treasury and fundamentally transform America... as they remake America in the image of a 3rd world nation... a Nation unable to resist integration into the New World Order.

Hope for the best on a lot of issues, and hope social media can pressure the system, to adjust its errors, or the errors can be forced to adjust, their call. Because if they do not, not even a simple tool will help them out of the mess.

Let's get real about this.  DACA is legalized lawlessness.

Now, if you can swallow that due to compassion, then you can swallow just about anything due to the same thing.

Compassion is irrelevant. It is a non-factor.  The offspring of illegals are also illegals.

DEPORT THEM.

If anything less is allowed other than swift deportation, then the law, the Constitution, is nothing but paper screwed up with ink blots. Meaningless. Absurd. 

It really is that simple.  REALLY.  TRULY IT IS THAT SIMPLE!

D_E_P_O_R_T  THEM!

Politicians are sworn to do just that. UPHOLD the CONSTITUTION.  Not make allowances for it. Uphold it. Yet, they insist upon making convoluted calculus problems about simple basic arithmetic.

How apt the scripture (look it up).  "Professing themselves wise, they become fools."

Rom. 1:22

Romans 1:28...

RSS

ONE NATION UNDER GOD

ALERT ALERT

 After Years Of Stagnation Under Obama 
Household Income Hits 50-Year High

Image result for money

Former President Barack Obama got plenty of praise for shepherding us through the recovery from the 2008 economic crisis. However, those on Main Street, USA, knew the truth — things weren’t any better than they had been when George W. Bush left office.

As The Weekly Standard reported in 2016, median household income when Obama came into office in 2009 was $56,731. In 2015, six years into his presidency, that number was $56,516 — a decrease of just over $200.

By the time he left office, it’s true that media household income had risen to $59,471 — but that was essentially the same as it had been in December, 2007, at the end of the “Great Recession” and just a few weeks before Obama took office, when it was $59,549.

So, how’s The Donald doing?

Well, as Investor’s Business Daily reported, a new study from Sentier Research found that the median household income in April was $61,483 — a 50-year high.

That’s up from $59,471 in January of 2017.

The firm tracks income using census data and adjusts for inflation — so even a slightly weaker dollar doesn’t account for the increase.

Donald Trump Jr.   @DonaldJTrumpJr  

Bad News For Dems: Household Income Hits All-Time High Under Trump … And He's Getting Credit For It!!! 

Household Income Hits All-Time High Under Trump, And He's Getting Credit For It

A new report shows that the median household income has climbed 3% since President Trump took office. It's another sign of a strong economy, and at least one poll shows the public credits Trump for...

That’s great news for the country, but maybe not the best news for Democrats.

“This is just another indication that the economy has notably strengthened under Trump. And polls show that the public’s mood has brightened considerably as a result,” Investor’s Business Daily reported.

“The latest IBD/TIPP Economic Optimism Index is 53.6. This index has been in positive territory (anything over 50 is optimistic) since Trump took office. The Quality of Life Index, meanwhile, hit a 14-year high in May and the Financial Stress Index is at an all-time low.”

That economic data is followed by a lot of polls that seem to show that the “blue wave” expected in the November midterms breaking and rolling back into the sea.

A new Reuters poll found that a generic Republican would beat a generic Democrat by six points. Back in March, the Democrats were up by nine points. A CBS poll found that Democrats had a two-point advantage on the generic ballot — hardly “wave” material.

The CBS poll also found that 68 percent of Americans believed Trump’s policies deserved at least some of the credit for the economic situation, with 35 percent saying he deserved a “great deal” of the credit.

Sixty-four percent of respondents rated the economy as “somewhat good” or “very good.” In a CNN poll, 57 percent of voters said that “things are going well in the U.S.” In February, that was 49 percent.

Perhaps the most important figure: Under Obama, when Gallup asked whether it was a good time to find “a quality job in the U.S.,” the highest number that administration ever achieved was 45 percent. Under Trump, that number is 67 percent — the highest number in the 17-year history of the poll.

While Trump’s personal numbers haven’t seen the same bounce, they’re still up — and that’s the important thing. Thanks to the relentless campaign of personal attacks against him, Trump’s stated approval rating has always been a lot lower than it probably is.

Don’t believe me? Just ask Hillary Clinton. For all of the personal barbs and attacks, 2016 ultimately came down to the economy. So will 2018 — and that’s not good news for the Democrats.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service