Anyone who has a DACA permit expiring between now and March 5, 2018, can apply for a two-year renewal.Even those DACA recipients whose DACA permits expires after March 5, will be eligible for legal status for another two-plus year.

In other words, Pres. Trump is giving Congress what it wants most, the DACA amnesty decision to be postponed until AFTER the 2018 election. 

But all is not lost. I see yesterday's Fox News article* supporting what I have been calling for in relation to any DACA amnesty: birthright citizenship reform. And here's the best part: it can be addressed without a constitutional amendment, at least that's what Herry Ried said back in his S. 1351 (103rd): Immigration Stabilization Act of 1993, under TITLE X--CITIZENSHIP

SEC. 1001. BASIS OF CITIZENSHIP CLARIFIED.

"In the exercise of its powers under section 5 of the Fourteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Congress has determined and hereby declares that any person born after the date of enactment of this title to a mother who is neither a citizen of the United States nor admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident, and which person is a national or citizen of another country of which either of his or her natural parents is a national or citizen, or is entitled upon application to become a national or citizen of such country, shall be considered as born subject to the jurisdiction of that foreign country and not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States within the meaning of section 1 of such Article and shall therefore not be a citizen of the United States or of any State solely by reason of physical presence within the United States at the moment of birth."

I agree. If Congress is going to offer DACA amnesty now to these lawbreaking illegal aliens, the very least they can do for their fellow law-abiding citizens in return is to restrict birthright U.S. citizenship to only those born exclusively under U.S. sovereignty, with no foreign allegiances or attachments at birth to ensure this type of breach of law doesn't happen again, and to finally put an end to the ludicrous situation where the offspring born here of illegal aliens are considered natural born U.S. citizens at birth.

* Source: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/04/trump-gop-should-keep-dac...

Views: 292

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

6-Month delay on rescinding
1. Attorney General Jeff Sessions held a press conference today where he announced a 6-month delay on rescinding DACA.
[Phasing out the program over a 6-month period is a more appropriat...

2. This delay places the future of immigrationsmatters related to DREAMers squarely in the hands of Congress. 
[But Daniel Horowitz says enough about DACA; where is the "sympathy...

See how simple and clean it really is. No bull, no sympathy, just the law. We are citizens. they are not.

Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)

"Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."
Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):
A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:
* assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or
* encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or
* knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.

Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief.

The existing law is clear... we don't need to study anything other than the laws on the books.  Start deporting these individuals and arresting US citizens who are aiding and abetting... criminally harboring these fugitives from justice.

So why is the act itself only a civil violation? I am not at all sure about the dynamics, but perhaps an upgrade to a 3rd felony would act as a stronger deterrent? Afterall, we are presently seeing an upswing in illegal crossings from recent years.

US Attorneys and DOJ... have decided not to pursue the felonies associated with harboring illegal aliens.

The MSM and Establishments narrative deliberately ignores the CRIMINAL citations in the current law... The public is being deceived.  The national narrative ignores and underplays the criminal actions available using the current law... they act as if they doesn't exist... when, the law is clear regarding the criminal actions by those aiding and abetting illegal aliens.

We have a corrupt system of government... highly corrupt... one that ignores the laws they don't like and enforces Executive Orders as if they were viable law. Up is down and down is up... Personally David ... I don't know how America can recover without major upheaval in our government.. possibly resulting in civil war. 

The Left is without moral restraint... they have no conscience and live by their moto... by any means necessary.  They believe the law is subject to selective prosecution and enforcement as they see fit... 'Prosecutorial discretion' is in fact illegal... It is the open manifestation of 'Misprision of a Felony'... a federal felony... committed by failing to enforce the laws of the U.S.

Mr. Nelson,

 I was just looking over some comments, you stated,"The existing law is clear... we don't need to study anything other than the laws on the books."

The Legal Flaw With Ditching DACA Administrative Procedure Act Magn...

The Legal Flaw With Ditching DACA Administrative Procedure Act Magna Carta: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/the-legal-flaw-with-ditchi...

DACA has no legal standing... it is in violation of Statutory Law... DACA violates the current Immigration and naturalization act(s) of 1952, 65, and 68, as amended. DACA stands overtly in opposition to these laws.  See: http://www.history.com/topics/us-immigration-since-1965

Additionally, the Immigration Reform Act in 1986 attempted to address many of our current immigration issues by providing better enforcement of immigration policies and creating more ways to seek legal entry to the US. The act included two amnesty programs for unauthorized aliens, and collectively granted amnesty to more than 3 million illegal aliens...

Amnesty is not new in Americas... It has proven to be an ineffective firewall against future illegal immigration. Internal enforcement of our immigration law, as they exist, is th only method proven to stop illegal immigration.  Enforcement of our borders and deportation are the most effective means for stopping and removing illegal aliens found in our society.

"Illegal immigration is wrong."...Charles Schumer 2009

In a major address at the 6th Annual Immigration Law and Policy Conference sponsored by MPI, Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., and Georgetown University Law Center, Senate Immigration Subcommittee Chairman Charles Schumer outlined the seven principles he said will form the basis for the immigration legislation he intends to introduce by this fall.

Members of the Establishment in both political parties have written off the current immigration laws as obsolete and in fact are willfully violating them... Both Administrations (Obama / Trump) and Congress's have failed to enforce the law.  They both actively pursuing policies that ... 'go around current law and the Congress' ... because, neither have the votes to promote their agenda...YET!

America is being dragged into a new world order....   America's institutions, and men like Sen. Schumer, are failing in loyalty to the US Constitution. Instead, these unfaithful men and their institutions have signed on to a New World Order.  These Globalist Politicians are traitors and need to be dealt with as such. 

The People are being deceived... and fed a daily diet of deceit and misdirection.  The elite in America continue to rape the US Treasury and fundamentally transform America... as they remake America in the image of a 3rd world nation... a Nation unable to resist integration into the New World Order.

Hope for the best on a lot of issues, and hope social media can pressure the system, to adjust its errors, or the errors can be forced to adjust, their call. Because if they do not, not even a simple tool will help them out of the mess.

Let's get real about this.  DACA is legalized lawlessness.

Now, if you can swallow that due to compassion, then you can swallow just about anything due to the same thing.

Compassion is irrelevant. It is a non-factor.  The offspring of illegals are also illegals.

DEPORT THEM.

If anything less is allowed other than swift deportation, then the law, the Constitution, is nothing but paper screwed up with ink blots. Meaningless. Absurd. 

It really is that simple.  REALLY.  TRULY IT IS THAT SIMPLE!

D_E_P_O_R_T  THEM!

Politicians are sworn to do just that. UPHOLD the CONSTITUTION.  Not make allowances for it. Uphold it. Yet, they insist upon making convoluted calculus problems about simple basic arithmetic.

How apt the scripture (look it up).  "Professing themselves wise, they become fools."

Rom. 1:22

Romans 1:28...

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Pat Cross

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

TEA PARTY -> Lois Lerner Case Explodes:
IRS Docs Link McCain’s Office To Tea Party Attacks

[CLICK TO VIEW]

Since announcing his brain cancer was terminal, Arizon Sen. John McCain has continued to make headlines, but not due to his medical status. Instead, it has been one controversy after another revolving around him, and now one more had been added to the list.

This one is based in his dislike not for Ted Cruz or Rand Paul, but of the tea party.

McCain has never really endeared himself to conservatives, and he made his feeling public about the tea party movement at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor in 2015, according to a Yahoo report.

“I think also — I probably shouldn’t say this — but some of (the tea party) appeals to the bad angels of our nature rather than the better angels of our nature,” McCain said.

This attitude ties into the latest scandal swirling around McCain.

One of a number of scandals that plagued President Barack Obama and his administration involved the IRS targeting tea party groups after 2010. It seemed that their tax-exempt status requests were denied or delayed due to intense political partisanship in the agency.

In May 2013, The Washington Post reported that the IRS’s exempt-organizations division director Lois Lerner “let slip” the week prior “that low-level IRS staffers had focused extra scrutiny on conservative groups with words such as ‘tea party’ or ‘patriot’ in their names.”

In addition, “internal reviews have shown that Lerner knew about the targeting in 2011 — but neither Congress nor the public knew until (2013).” Despite this, Lerner was never prosecuted and was allowed to retire with her taxpayer-funded pension intact.

This did not change, even after House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, a Texas Republican, and Tax Policy Subcommittee Chairman Peter Roskam, an Illinois Republican, wrote a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions. In it, they begged him to reopen a probe into the matter, according to Jay Sekulow, chief council for the American Center for Law and Justice, writing in a commentary for Fox News.

When President Donald Trump was sworn into office, some held out hope that the perceived injustices from Obama’s tenure would somehow be made right. However, in September 2017, Trump’s administration had already preemptively declined to pursue criminal charges against Lerner “based on the available evidence,” according to Fox News.

But more has since been uncovered about the scandal. Government watchdog group Judicial Watch has obtained and released “internal IRS documents, including material revealing that Sen. John McCain’s former staff director and chief counsel on the Senate Homeland Security Permanent Subcommittee, Henry Kerner, urged top IRS officials, including then-director of exempt organizations Lois Lerner, to “audit so many that it becomes financially ruinous.”

Judicial Watch �dd0e

JW President @TomFitton: Much of what you know about the IRS scandal is thanks to JW... Our new docs show the scandal is bipartisan in nature. A McCain staffer suggested Lois Lerner audit all of the 501(c)(4) groups in a way that'd be financially ruinous.

Meeting notes from April 30, 2013, involving Kerner, Lerner, “and other high-ranking IRS officials” were obtained by JW. With the meeting taking place only 10 days before the IRS scandal exploded into the public view, they are particularly incriminating against Kerner and Lerner:

“Henry Kerner asked how to get to the abuse of organizations claiming section 501 (c)(4) but designed to be primarily political. Lois Lerner said the system works, but not in real time.”

“Henry Kerner noted that these organizations don’t disclose donors. Lois Lerner said that if they don’t meet the requirements, we can come in and revoke, but it doesn’t happen timely.”

“Nan Marks said if the concern is that organizations engaging in this activity don’t disclose donors, then the system doesn’t work. Henry Kerner said that maybe the solution is to audit so many that it is financially ruinous. Nikole noted that we have budget constraints.”

“Elise Bean suggested using the list of organizations that made independent expenditures. Lois Lerner said that it is her job to oversee it all, not just political campaign activity.”

Thus far, there is no evidence that McCain knew about or directed Kerner to take such action. It is plausible that Kerner, knowing of McCain’s dislike of the tea party, opted to be a proactive and loyal staffer by urging the IRS to take action against the groups.

But McCain’s personality does little to keep him far removed from the scandal and tongues are wagging with speculation as to his involvement. Regardless, McCain’s frosty relationship with President Donald Trump has not made the Arizona senator many fans among Trump supporters.

New suspicions about him betraying the tea party won’t help matters at all.

OMG

Chelsea Handler Says Fox Doesn’t Work With
Black People, Obviously Doesn’t Watch Network

Humor is supposed to be based on truth. After all, the reason we laugh at a joke or scenario is because it triggers a feeling of recognition about reality, especially if it’s presented in an unexpected way.

It doesn’t look like “comedian” Chelsea Handler has a very firm grasp on truth or reality, however.

After a production error during a Fox News broadcast was called out by users on Twitter, the raunchy and sex-obsessed Handler tried to bash the network … but ended up showing off her ignorance instead.

“Fox News honored Aretha Franklin by using a graphic that contained a photo of Patti LaBelle,” the comedian and television host posted on Twitter Thursday evening.

That part was true enough: Fox admitted that they made a mistake on a background slide during a tribute to the late soul singer, and accidentally showed a faded photo of LaBelle. The main image still showed Franklin, who passed away on Thursday in Detroit.

Broadcast television is complex, which you would think Handler understands after being involved in TV for many years. Honest mistakes happen on every network. But no: In Handler’s alternate reality, the only explanation for the mistake was racism.

“It’s probably hard for anyone who works at Fox News to tell black people apart because they’ve never worked with any,” she declared.

Chelsea Handler  @chelseahandler

Fox News honored Aretha Franklin by using a graphic that contained a photo of Patti LaBelle. It’s probably hard for anyone who works at Fox News to tell black people apart because they’ve never worked with any.

Was she trying to be bitter or funny? It was hard to tell, but either way, that statement shows just how isolated the Hollywood left is from reality.

If she really believes that Fox has “never worked with any” black people, maybe she should try an experiment: Actually watch the channel for a minute.

She would probably tune in to the face of Harris Faulkner, the enthusiastic and Emmy-winning host of “Outnumbered,” which airs every single weekday.

Or, maybe she could get a clue from Deneen Borelli, another well-known face of Fox News for nearly a decade. How about the venerable Juan Williams, co-host of “The Five” and a “Fox News Sunday” regular for over 20 years?

Nah. They apparently don’t count, because Handler would rather live in an alternate reality of ignorance than admit she was the one making racial assumptions.

We’re not finished! Moving on to frequent guest contributors to Fox News, how about Candace Owens? Brandon Tatum? Ben Carson? Larry Elder? All of these smart individuals are familiar faces at Fox, and all are — look closely! — African American.

That’s saying nothing of the behind-the-scenes staff at Fox, a good number of whom are of course black. In fact, it’s completely possible the photo mix-up was accidentally made by a black employee. Handler openly assumed the race of the staff members who made the error, while knowing nothing.

Once again, the left has tipped their hand and revealed just how elitist and out of touch they are.

Handler has likely never turned on Fox News in her life, yet she thinks she’s an expert on it. She eagerly diminishes and waves away the contributions of black Americans to one of the most popular news stations in the nation, while lecturing others about race.

This type of attitude implies that only “liberal approved” black voices count. If they don’t parrot a 43-year-old white comedian’s politics, they’re invisible to her.

That arrogant view, and not an honest editing mistake, is perhaps the real outrage here … and it’s exactly why so many black voters are walking away from the left.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service