Not for sure how true this is, but the 4 videos to the right hand side of this site are blocked youtube took them down and I know two were Alex Jones' Videos.  Now for the news-


A few hours after Facebook announced it had permanently banned Infowars, YouTube also terminated Jones’s channel on its platform

Streaming services Apple and Spotify have also removed Jone’s daily podcasts.

The social media giant shut down InfoWars’ page saying the conservative news outlet used hate speech. Paul Joseph Watson, an editor at the website said Facebook failed to say what the offending posts were.

MediaCard--mediaForward

customisable-border" data-scribe="component:card" dir="ltr">
View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
Paul Joseph Watson
@PrisonPlanet

Facebook has permanently BANNED Infowars.

For unspecified "hate speech". They didn't even tell us what the offending posts were.

This sets a chilling precedent for free speech.

To all other conservative news outlets - you are next.

The great censorship purge has truly begun.

https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1026405120697946112?ref_src...

Facebook said in a blog post that the four main Infowars pages were “unpublished for repeated violations of Community Standards and accumulating too many strikes.”

WikiLeaks
@wikileaks

Infowars says it has been banned by Facebook for unspecified 'hate speech'. Regardless of the facts in this case, the ability of Facebook to censor rivial publishers is a global anti-trust problem, which along with San Francisco cultural imperialism, reduces political diversity.

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1026426339795001344?ref_src=tw...

WikiLeaks
@wikileaks

The empire strikes back: Apple, Spotify, Facebook and Google/Youtube all purge Infowars/Alex Jones. Yes, Infowars has frequent nonsense, but also a state power critique. Which publisher in the world with millions of subscribers is next to be wiped out for cultural transgression?

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1026500710194708483?ref_src=tw...

Googles YouTube also cited a breach of “community guidelines” for the removal of the Alex Jones channel.

It was cut off on Monday afternoon, following an earlier purge of Jones’ content on Facebook, Apple, and Spotify. Some of Jones’ videos had garnered millions of views at the time of their deletion.

Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸
@JackPosobiec

Infowars has been banned from YouTube

https://twitter.com/DanieltheTucker/status/1026499658124652544?ref_...

RT reports: The move has been called “a purge” and “political censorship” by InfoWars Editor-at-Large, Paul Joseph Watson, who made the announcement on Twitter, along with an screenshot image from YouTube saying the account “has been terminated for violating YouTube’s community guidelines.”

“Apple, Spotify, Facebook and now Google (which owns YouTube) – all within 12 hours of each other. A coordinated purge. This is a total abuse of power,” he tweeted.

https://yournewswire.com/facebook-youtube-apple-spotify-ban-infowar...

Views: 40

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

YouTube, Facebook and Apple shut down Alex Jones channels- YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoojVXE5Xao

 The system of the elite is going after all networks, or news networks that expose the left agendas. All who support President Trump will be shadow banned. The elections are just around the corner.

CNN Lobbies Facebook To Shut Down YourNewsWire


CNN lobbies Facebook to permanently shut down YourNewsWire.com “Despite being debunked at least 80 times, and having its posts fact-checked as false through Facebook’s fact-checking partnership at least 45 times, YourNewsWire is still publishing on the platform,” CNNs Oliver Darcy tweeted on Friday.

https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1020337251719569409?ref_src=...

In his Tweet, Darcy links to the Poynter hit-piece in which far-left activist Daniel Funke complains that YourNewsWire.com still has a presence online despite the fact that disreputable “fact-checkers” such as Snopes have worked around the clock to try and debunk anything and everything we publish.

It should be noted that these very same people are also trying to censor and remove Infowars from Facebook too.

Per Infowars:  In an article for CNN, senior media reporter Oliver Darcy explains how he tried to convince Facebook top brass to terminate our Facebook presence.

“Facebook invited me to an event today where the company aimed to tout its commitment to fighting fake news and misinformation. I asked them why InfoWars is still allowed on the platform. I didn’t get a good answer,” tweeted Darcy.

Oliver Darcy
@oliverdarcy

Facebook invited me to an event today where the company aimed to tout its commitment to fighting fake news and misinformation.

I asked them why InfoWars is still allowed on the platform.

I didn't get a good answer

https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1017242469308788741?ref_src=...

In his CNN piece, Darcy reveals how he asked the head of Facebook’s News Feed John Hegeman, “How the company could claim it was serious about tackling the problem of misinformation online while simultaneously allowing InfoWars to maintain a page with nearly one million followers on its website.”

Hegeman explained that InfoWars has “not violated something that would result in them being taken down.”

Not satisfied, Darcy asked Facebook product specialist Sara Su why Facebook allowed Infowars to operate a page when it “is notorious for spreading demonstrably false information and conspiracy theories on a host of issues.”

When Darcy asked Facebook for a follow up statement, his third attempt to have Facebook shut down Infowars in a single day, the company admitted that it down-ranked Infowars content in its algorithm.

“We work hard to find the right balance between encouraging free expression and promoting a safe and authentic community, and we believe that down-ranking inauthentic content strikes that balance,” said Facebook spokeswoman Lauren Svensson. “In other words, we allow people to post it as a form of expression, but we’re not going to show it at the top of News Feed.”

Darcy’s article was shared by innumerable other CNN and mainstream media hacks in a coordinated effort to circulate the same narrative.

Washington Post columnist Matt O’Brien:

Matt O'Brien
@ObsoleteDogma

A website that’s said 9/11 was an inside job, Sandy Hook was a hoax, and Democrats were running a child sex ring out of the basement of a pizza shop apparently meets Facebook’s standards for truthfulness!

Does anyone seriously think Facebook is making the world a better place?

https://twitter.com/ObsoleteDogma/status/1017173438165905408?ref_sr...

This underscores once again how CNN is not an impartial news outlet, it is an activist organization using its considerable financial and institutional muscle to shut down a competitor.

Despite the fact that Infowars is far smaller than CNN, its influence and cultural relevance threatens CNN’s entire business model. A lot of President Trump’s base are also concentrated within the Infowars audience.

Earlier this year, CNN launched a sustained campaign to pressure YouTube into shutting down the Alex Jones Channel after the Parkland shooting. The lobbying effort was almost successful, with the channel being one strike away from being permanently suspended, although it ultimately failed.

https://yournewswire.com/cnn-lobbies-facebook-shutdown-yournewswire/

 Sometimes I can not figure out the errors here with the site, so I am fixing some statements that I know I did not write it so.

Alex Jones has a habit of blogging news that is not correct, but youtube made a error in deleting his account. This caused a system failure in hundreds of sites where his videos are at. Now also from what I read here it was not just Alex Jones the left attacked.

 I did notice Mrs. Morgan to the right at this site the video have been removed by youtube. It is clear that they do not want any site to promote President Trump for another 4 years, this include the Republican Party taking over for another 8 years. Even though most Republicans seem more left then the 'Demonuts Democrats'.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service