Eyewitness to LaVoy Finicum’s Murder: All Gun Shots were fired by Feds as He had His Hands in the Air, Snipers in Trees – It was an Ambush

An eyewitness said that the shooting that took place on Tuesday that resulted in the death of Robert "LaVoy" Finicum all happened as a result of federal agents firing their weapons unlawfully. The woman claims that not one of the people who were stopped drew their gun. All of the bullets fired were from federal agents.

Mark McConnell, who lists all the people who were in the vehicles when the stop occurred. He makes mention of an unnamed 18-year-old girl, who I'll let you hear later in the article, who claims to have been inside the truck when the shooting occurred.

He claims to have been the first vehicle stopped by several trucks. He was driving Ammon Bundy. However, after they were "secured," McConnell says that the feds that detained them radioed ahead to detain the other vehicle, which LaVoy was driving. He estimated that they were about 200 yards ahead of him, when someone got out of the passenger's side and that person "went to the ground… were handcuffed."

Ryan Payne then drove away, but McConnell says that was not the smartest move. He wasn't saying it to put him down, but just an honest assessment of what takes place when you do that. Why it would be considered an "act of aggression" though seems strange to me.

McConnell says that what took place once they were out of sight is only what he is piecing together from the story of Shauna Cox and Ryan Payne. He does believe Finicum was very passionate about what they were involved in and did comment that Finicum "charged" the feds, but the reality is that he could not see what took place at that time.

Read more:

http://freedomoutpost.com/2016/01/eyewitness-to-lavoy-finicums-murd...                  

Game over people, Obama and the feds are out to kill us!

Views: 1369

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yeah I know...it's hard to accept our government has turned so corrupt. This is what happens in communist countries with dictators. Who would have ever thought the US would go communist-style government. All I know is if it was my family member, I wouldn't sit quiet about it.

SAW A BLOG SUPPOSEDLY FROM LA VOY'S WIFE SAYING SHE GOT HIS BODY BACK. THAT IS KIND OF QUICK. SHE SAYS HE WAS SHOT 9 TIMES AND HE WAS SHOT IN THE FACE. THE VIDEO SHOWS NONE OF THAT. SHE ALSO SAYS THE GUN THEY FOUND WAS STOLEN 2 YEARS AGO. NOT HIS. SHE SAYS THEY PLANTED IT ON HIM. SERIAL NO 54119868 A 9 MM.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2016/02/did-the-fbi-shoot-lavoy-finicum-9...

http://freedomoutpost.com/2016/01/enhanced-video-shows-lavoy-finicu...

1st post is unverified, that he was shot 9 times.

2nd link is the enhanced version showing 3 shots, him grabbing his side as he was shot.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service