EPA Thugs Destroy Vet Family Over Definition of Navigable Waters

 Big-government socialism claimed another victim days ago, leaving an elderly widow to carry on a cause for basic individual rights that were crushed under the tyranny of the federal EPA.

Joe Robertson, 80, is survived by his wife, and he served with distinction in the U.S. Navy before retiring to the big-sky country of Montana, staying busy with supplying critical water for state firefighters.

It was this business that federal EPA thugs targeted and destroyed on the fraudulent grounds that several ponds on Robertson land created a disturbance to a tiny babbling brook that bureaucrats in Washington DC classified as a navigable waterway.

Oh, the irony. The retired navy man did not see the brook as navigable.

Robertson neglected to obtain a permit, so Robertson must be destroyed, was the moniker the EPA operated by, using the oft destructive Clean Water Act.

Through an extensive and arduous legal struggle that involved the Pacific Legal Foundation, the EPA pursued the matter to an 18-month sentence on Robertson’s back that he served.

The fight to clear Joe Robertson is a fight to restore EPA and other government departments to Constitutional perimeters, to include shuttering the EPA as no such authority is described or delineated in the Constitution. (Free Thought Project photo)

The EPA also slapped a $130,000 restitution fine on the Robertson family that syphoned their Social Security benefits for good.

Little more than a year after his release, the rouged and imposing mountain of a man, navy veteran and partner to area firefighters passed because of what his widow Carri described as natural causes.

Imprisonment and an ongoing case seeking his life and legacy didn’t help, surely, and passing away under the shadow of a 20-month active probation order is an insult this veteran did not deserve.

According to PLF attorneys, the case suffered because of unclear rulings at the level of the U.S. Supreme Court.

A PLF statement reads, “Whether this conviction was lawful depends on the definition of ‘navigable waters.’ In Rapanos v. US (a PLF case), the Court sought to define the scope of the Clean Water Act. The Court split on a 4-1-4 vote.”

The PLF has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Robertson’s conviction

Pacific Legal Foundation statement

So the EPA thugs wing it on the broad interpretation that Justice Kennedy favored, while Justice Scalia’s moderating of federal jurisdiction is ignored, though equally expressed by the Court.

Under Scalia’s plurality opinion, “Robertson would have been found not guilty, if charged at all,” the PLF stated, “since [Robertson’s] ponds are more than 40 miles away from the river, and do not abut lakes or streams.”

The PLF is pursuing a new Supreme Court review of the case, and attorneys are active processing papers in the sad routine to transfer the case to the name of Carri Robertson as petitioner.

“The PLF has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Robertson’s conviction,” they stated.

The Supreme Court is expected to decide this month whether it will hear the Robertson case’s appeal.


Views: 224

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Navigable Waters, 33 CFR Part 329 - DEFINITION OF NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE: https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=AEmxXLXwKOLI_Qb_pYGQ...

 British Sovereignty In America...LMAO...:)-

§ 329.4 General definition.
"Navigable waters of the United States are those waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. A determination of navigability, once made, applies laterally over the entire surface of the waterbody, and is not extinguished by later actions or events which impede or destroy navigable capacity." 

 Thats to funny Ronald, first off the man is dead, died in prison, they took everything he and his family had, all because he said NO!!!

 HELL NO this is my POND its not a right a way, They murdered another VET to take all his property away all nice and legal, according to CFR dubbed DIPPED British LAWS.

 You know Ronald, people are real tired of their control and are willing to die...

 Do you think its all BS with the Militia???

The Judge in this case needs to be disbarred and removed... in addition, all US Attorney's their assistants and any defense coucil associated with this case need to be disbarred... and prosecuted for malfesance in office and fraudulent prosecution... among other charges.

The President needs to take an interest in cases like this and use them to go after the bureaucrats in the DOJ system, that allow such crap to be prosecuted... Fire them, and in many cases prosecute them, for abuse of office, official powers, fraudulent prosecution etc.

This sort of thing should NEVER happen in America... Where is the President?  Has he pulled a BUSH.. gone and AWOL on such matters?

And yes the PRIVATE MILITIA as currently organized, trained, funded and equipped, is not only JOKE, it is DANGEROUS... delusional and incompetent... to think it can be effective in its PRESENT STATUS.

Ask Al Qaeda a type of private militial... albiet, much better organized, trained and equipped, than most private US Militia groups, how effective they are against US Military power and then think about it.  I am not against a Militia, if it is properly organized, trained, equipped and operates, within existing US Law.

P/S Tif I think you are misunderstanding the use of (CFR) in this case... it means:.

The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is the codification of the general and permanent rules and regulations (sometimes called administrative law) published in the Federal Register by the executive departments and agencies of the federal government of the United States. The CFR is divided into 50 titles that represent broad areas subject to federal regulation.
Code of Federal Regulations - Wikipedia

It is not a refernce to the Council on Foreign Relations.

And Ronald,

 You know they do not care, and if he was your friend, and you tried to help, they would destroy your life and your families life all so.

 That is how they are these days, they have all the power, they have the White House.

 But they do not have my heart and my soul.

 They murdered a VET because of a POND, they wanted his property and they used the courts to get the job done!!!!!!

This only applies if we were in control of ours.

 Well Ronald, according to the google link, they are, and I am very surprised its not listed under Magna Carta....:)

According to google the world is flat...  I just read a blog stating so.  Give me a break.  Google is hardly an authority on anything other than providing a search engine that is realtively fast and effective.

Next, who are THEY... and what has Magna Carta an English historical document written in 1215 AD to do with this discussion...  

According to NASA they no longer have the technology to go to the moon so instead they are going to Mars. LMOL

Your so funny Ronald...:)

Who are THEY... and what Google link are the mysterious 'They' on? Was it the one linked to the "World is Flat Article" or the one linked to " Missing Link Found In Florida"....

 Hank, where you at...Ronald can not find the link you post...


Navigable Waters, 33 CFR Part 329 - DEFINITION OF NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE: https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=AEmxXLXwKOLI_Qb_pYGQ...




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Joe Biden Vows: Give Taxpayer-Funded Obamacare To All Illegal Aliens In U.S.

Former Vice President and 2020 Democrat presidential primary candidate Joe Biden is vowing to give Obamacare, funded by American taxpayers, to all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens living in the United States.

During an interview with Telemundo’s Jose Diaz-Balart, Biden forgot that Obamacare technically bans illegal aliens from enrolling in healthcare plans — although illegal aliens are still able to obtain subsidized and free healthcare at Americans’ expense — and promised that under his plan, all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens would be able to get Obamacare.

The exchange went as follows:

DIAZ-BALART: When I … NBC moderated that first debate with you, I didn’t … I don’t recall a clear answer, under your plan should … would the 11, 12 million undocumented immigrants that live in the United States, that have been here many for generations, would they have access …


DIAZ-BALART: — to health insurance.

BIDEN: Yes, they … if they can buy into the system like everybody else.

DIAZ-BALART: Because you know, in [Obamacare] they can’t.

BIDEN: Yeah. Yeah, I know. Well they can, that’s my point. They continue to be able to do that.

DIAN-BALART: They cannot under the ObamaCare.

BIDEN: Well and that’s my point, they will though. They will be able to buy into … [illegal aliens] would be able to buy in, just like anyone else could.

Biden joins Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg — among other 2020 Democrats — in committing to forcing American taxpayers to pay for healthcare for illegal aliens who arrive in the U.S.

Already, due to loopholes, American taxpayers are spending nearly $20 billion every year to provide illegal aliens with subsidized healthcare, emergency room visits, and other health services.

Under the 2020 Democrats’ plan to provide taxpayer-funded healthcare to all illegal aliens living in the U.S., Americans would be billed potentially $660 billion every decade just to cover the costs. Other research has found that the plan would cost Americans at least $23 billion every year.

As Breitbart News has reported, experts have said that giving taxpayer-funded healthcare to effectively all foreign nationals who can make it to America’s borders would drive “strong incentives for people with serious health problems to enter the country or remain longer than their visas allow in order to get government-funded care.”

Despite 2020 Democrats’ continued push for taxpayer-funded healthcare for illegal aliens, American voters are overwhelmingly opposed to the plan. The latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey revealed that the healthcare-for-illegal-aliens plan is the least popular policy position, with opposition from 62 percent of U.S. voters.

Similarly, a CNN poll from July discovered that 63 percent of likely swing voters oppose providing healthcare to illegal aliens, along with nearly 6-in-10 of all likely U.S. voters and 61 percent of moderates. A Rasmussen Reports survey also found that likely voters, by a majority of 55 percent, oppose giving healthcare to even the most low-income illegal aliens.

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service