DOJ AND DHS fraud and corruption against Sheriff Joe...

Private Attorney General discloses DOJ and DHS corruption to Sheriff Joe Arpaio


Paul Andrew Mitchell Greetings Sheriff Arpaio, Deputy Sheriffs and All Staff:

Please allow us to itemize for your official consideration
a small sampling of reasons why the U.S. Department of Justice
and Department of Homeland Security are corrupt and
motivated to retaliate corruptly against your office:

(1) our ongoing investigation of missing credentials required of
all Federal government officers has confirmed that counterfeit
OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS are
circulating widely among recently hired Federal “employees”;
see 5 U.S.C. sections 2903, 2906 and 3331:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/3331.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2906.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2903.html

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03...

(2) that “bootleg” form is a counterfeit because it lacks the OMB control number
that is absolutely required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (“PRA”);
it also lacks the paragraph at the bottom which cites 5 U.S.C. 2903 supra
defining the persons who are authorized to administer Standard Form 61 (“SF-61″);
in such cases, the Public Protection Clause of that PRA is rather explicit:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/44/3512.html (b)

(b) The protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a

complete defense, bar, or otherwise at any time

during the agency administrative process or judicial action applicable thereto.
(3) in line with our ongoing investigation described above,
you are hereby formally notified that the SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
for Eric H. Holder, Jr. are also fatally defective, for the same reasons:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affi...
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/affi...

Here are our original Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Requests for Holder’s SF-61:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/foia.request.holder.op...
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/foia.request.holder.htm

In addition to the counterfeit credential above, the related correspondence we received
is archived here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-04-28/page...
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-04-28/page...

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/letter.2010-06-09/page...

Accordingly, the existence of valid credentials for Eric H. Holder, Jr.
assumes facts not in evidence and, therefore, he is not and cannot be
a duly authorized Attorney General of the United States, nor can he
as such delegate any authority to any subordinates within DOJ.

(Frankly, I have more authority than he does at present.

See 18 U.S.C. 1964; Rotella v. Wood.)

(4) Janet Napolitano has already been charged with multiple Federal offenses
in connection with a Federal Grand Jury “subpoena” which the late
U.S. District Judge John M. Roll authorized my office to litigate
in defense of the Arizona trust which had been served with same:

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/predicate.acts.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/roll/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/roll/nadappea.htm#napolitano1512
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/roll/nadappea.htm#napolitano1510

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/azvmitch/crossco4.htm

[begin excerpt]

Ms. Janet Napolitano with:

(1) aiding and abetting the obstruction of correspondence

transmitted via first class, certified, and registered

United States mail, under color of law, in violation of 18

U.S.C. 2 and 1702 (twenty-five (25) counts);

(2) aiding and abetting the act of tampering with a federal

grand jury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1512 (twenty-

five (25) counts);

(3) aiding and abetting obstruction of criminal investigations,

in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1510 (twenty-five (25)

counts);

(4) deprivation of fundamental Rights under color of law,

specifically the Right to Petition a lawfully convened

federal grand jury for a formal investigation, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. 242 (twenty-five (25) counts);

(5) conspiracy to commit all of the above, in violation of 18

U.S.C. 241 and 371 (twenty-five (25) counts);

(6) impersonating an officer of the United States, in violation

of 5 U.S.C. 3331 and 18 U.S.C. 912 (one (1) count each).

[end excerpt]

We also have reasons strongly to suspect that Ms. Napolitano was also complicit
for failing to do anything but obstruct and stonewall our part-time investigation into the
whereabouts of 2,500 missing children — and young adults — who had reportedly
“disappeared” into Arizona’s Child Protective Services:

http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/kidnaps.htm
(cf. 42 U.S.C. 1986: action for neglect to prevent and/or failure to remedy)

(5) lastly, and arguably of equal or greater severity, for many years DOJ
has been commencing ALL civil and criminal lawsuits in the U.S. District Courts
on behalf of one or the other of 2 defunct Delaware corporations named
“UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” [sic]; when we brought this fact to the
attention of the Delaware Secretary of State, both corporate charters
were promptly REVOKED!

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif

We recommend that you make official contact with the Arizona Secretary of State
to confirm that neither defunct corporation has ever registered to do business
inside the State of Arizona, as we have already confirmed with the
Secretaries of State for California and several other large States of the Union:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/ (e.g. New York State = the heart of “The Conspiracy”)

We elaborate the all important differences between the “United States”
and the “United States of America” here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
(read “NOT a corporation”: U.S. v. Cooper Corp.)

If we can be of any further assistance to your offices in this matter,
please direct one of your capable Staff to initiate contact with me here, via email,
and we can take it from there.

We are standing by, Sheriff Arpaio.
Paul Andrew Mitchell

Bcc: Arizona Attorney General, Crime, Fraud and Victim Resource Center

Views: 1122

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

epiphany: we have absolutely no authorized government in the white house and no representation by any who are authorized. I do believe we are actually being ruled by a dictatorship of a select and elite group. 

Mitchina I agree with you so who leads when we no authorized government?  Who corrects this.  Can this mess be corrected?

We do.  Which is what we did in the initial break into being our own free country.  I am afraid this would be the only way of getting it back. 

Yes my friend and it is "We the People." We can and must stand up. We out number them in the millions and We must do it NOW.

 

thanks crash...

It is past time to end this stupidity.

I fully agree we all have to do something to stop this destruction of our country.....................

yeah the gentiles are coming

the jig is up

charade is over

 

UN Paramilitary dressed in disguises  and positioned insurgents all ready to pounce

 

u don't need to speak english to pulla trigger

We knew there was corruption in D.C., now Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano are getting their hands more than slapped!  Remove them from their offices and let them serve jail time like any other American citizen would do!  Now, Charging and removing the big cheese or bho trying him for treason, and acts against the United States and against the US Constitution for which this country was founded on.. jail all the corrupt politicians and liars and start with an all new fresh Congress and Senators, Reps, who ever isnt carrying out their duties for the people and the states they represent.  They forget who put them into office.. "We The People", did.. this is the kind of Change we need now.

Well said Karen!! I agree 100%.  God Bless America!!

I would say almost all of us agree with you Karen, but outside a general revolution, that can only happen if we can get the right people in position (office) and all at the same time. Take a look around at all the Demon (liberal) states and realize THAT would be a monumental task at best. Too many on the dole with Obozo adding to the count every chance he gets.

Let us not forget about which agency is assigned to protect the integrity of the offices that these criminals hold; it is the U.S. Marshall"s service. We must get them engaged in the legal processes since this corrupt Congress abided by a corrupt media will not perform their Constitutional duties.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Bob Gorrell

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

Image result for puke happy faceWatch: Hillary Clinton Says She’s ‘Deluged’ With Requests To Run Again

Hillary Clinton says she is “deluged” with requests to try another run for president and has still not completely ruled out joining the crowded field of 2020 Democrat candidates.

The former U.S. Secretary of State has repeatedly avoided categorically stepping out of the race for the White House – or directly into it, for that matter.

During media appearances in the UK last month, Clinton twice hinted she may make a belated push on the basis she claims so many people want to see her on the national stage once more.

Speaking on the BBC’s Graham Norton Show in London last Friday, Clinton confirmed she would “have to make up my mind really quickly” if she was going to join the race.

When pushed to respond if she would make a run for the White House for a third time, she prevaricated and avoided a direct reply, instead responding with: “As I say, never, never, never say never.”

She did concede she would need to make up her mind “really quickly” about whether or not to jump into the presidential race.

Clinton has already missed the filing deadline for the first primary in New Hampshire but there is no deadline for the next caucuses in Iowa in early February.

Responding to Norton, Clinton said she had been “deluged” over the last few weeks thinking about running again, but added that, “right now, I’m not, at all, planning that.”

Norton asked: “The rumour mill is flying that you could step back into the ring.”

Clinton replied: “I hear that. I have been deluged the last few weeks with thinking about doing that, but right now I’m not at all planning that.”

Last month Clinton told BBC Radio 5 Live she was under “enormous pressure” to consider a 2020 White House run.

When asked about her future in politics, Clinton said, “I feel a sense of responsibility partly because you know my name was on the ballot, I got more votes, but ended up losing to the current incumbent in the White House who I think is really undermining our democracy in very fundamental ways. And I want to retire him.”

When asked if she is absolutely ruling it out, Clinton said, “ I will certainly tell you. I’m under enormous pressure from many, many, many people to think about it. But as of this moment, sitting here in this studio talking to you, that is absolutely not in my plans.”

Clinton and her daughter Chelsea, are currently in London promoting their new co-authored book – The Book Of Gutsy Women: Favourite Stories Of Courage And Resilience.

d e g e n e r a c y

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service