Do you think Trump will be assassinated and if so by what group?

Views: 1480

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yes,  by George Soros or a cabal consisting of Democrats and Establishment Republicans. 

Pretty scary stuff.

Needs some vetting.

The clintonian's "global Initive" George sore-ass, insane/hussian/isis/mooseslimes that hate Trump, the "new blackass panthers. Seems like the whole world is against the guy going up against their now tyranny!

Trump is part of the tyranny! WE don't even have to look back at his record to confirm that - Just listening to the narcissistic demagogue talk for 5 minutes and there's no question he will always be a waste of tyrant skin!

TRUMP! is in NO WAY part of the tyranny, He was a businessman, forced into having to play the rigged political game in order to do business. That is why he is running, because he has seen exactly how corrupt our political system is. He is willing to expose everything he has ever done, in order to put America first, and to SERVE this country, rather than to continue just minding his own business.

He loves this country, if you don't get that, it is because you are listening to soundbites and not to what he says, outside of the debates. He is too busy in debates defending himself. Listen to his rallies. Read his platform. They show much better where his heart is, it is for this country and its people.

Why is it so obvious that when TRUMP! haters speak, it is so vile, insulting and hate filled?

Jea9, It has came to my attention that we have some of the Trump haters in the TPCC. For some reason, they appear on the "Front Page Cover" with no comment tabs. What does that tell us ? They support Cruz.

I don't think so my friend. What you have is DNC cyber warriors here to cause division in the ranks. I like Cruz too. But will support who ever the top dog is at the end. Because we can't afford to lose this election either through those that stay home because their person didn't get the top slot. Like our far right did when Huckabee didn't get it in 2012.

  If the communists are allowed to appoint two more far left communists to the SCOTUS ? This country is finished !

  We will get one more like these two !

We must remove both Sotomayor and Kagan...they lied to Congress and violated judicial ethics nearly immediately upon taking office... by sitting on cases they had prior knowledge of and had made public statements as to their positions. 

Impeach Kagan and Sotomayor... and indict and jail Holder for perjury before Congress and many other offenses.

Maybe nothing... maybe everything?  Who knows for sure?

W  They are all through here, but most likely found snarling and lying and taking things out of context, on TPN. Nasty describes each and every one of them.  Cruz's crooked, dirty campaign has sure caught the right fruit from the tree, if you get my meaning.

Exactly Jea9...

Trump is a patriot business man whose purpose for running is to save our country from an elite groups of progressives and globalist ... that are yoking us to a new world order.  He is aware of the serious problems regarding our economy, Constitution, and rule of law... and he wants to correct them.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service