Display Bible Target of Censorship at VA Hospital in New Hampshire

 Air Force Times – A dispute over a Bible display at the Manchester Veterans Affairs hospital in New Hampshire is erupting into a full-fledged war, with close-air support and vows from both sides to trample the enemy underfoot.

A Bible on display at a VA hospital in New Hampshire is the subject of a legal challenge on Constitutional separation grounds to have it removed. (AP photo)

 

 The Military Religious Freedom Foundation filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday on behalf of an Air Force veteran against Alfred Montoya, director of the Manchester VA Medical Center, seeking removal of a Bible on display at a POW/MIA table within the hospital . . .

 “The Christian Bible clearly doesn’t represent all of the myriad religious faiths and non-faith traditions of the U.S. armed forces veterans using the Medical Center,” said Michael Weinstein, MRFF’s founder and president.

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-military/2019/05/07/lawsuit...

Views: 67

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 So, they want to play games with VETS, bad choice.

We need a petition or a letter writing campaign to Washington Dc to stop this crap once and for all.

They know the U S Constitution has nothing in it about a separation of church and state, but the stupid liberals still want to use that card over and over again.

 There will be a blog shared here soon, where the our Military VET's are being censored.  I do remember reading there is a separation of Church and state.

There is no Constitutional separation of church and state... there is a prohibition against the State ESTABLISHING a religion, as a State Religion. 

Our founders left England and Europe in large part to avoid state-sponsored religion.... they wanted to worship God as they believed God desired... not as the State Mandated religion required.  Our founders would be appalled at the Supreme Courts decisions and twisting of the Constitution regarding the free exercise of religion... in government and our public schools.

For the first 200yrs of our history our government... federal, state and local, heavily involved Christian theology and scripture in their common law and government institutions.  It is only recently... the last 75 yrs or so... that religion has gradually been barred from the public square. 

 So it has been turned into a prohibition, like a take over of beer and dope, sold to use by this Government.........

Changed from a Constitutional Separation of Church and State to a prohibition...:)

 So has this Government stopped building the NWO Church of Scientology?

Government is, in fact, promoting a 'Government Sponsored Religion'.  Today, the government is mandating 'Humanism' as the State religion. A secular religious order, by which man replaces God as God.  America has a State Religion, it is called Humanism.

Religion is a cultural system of designated behaviors and practices, morals, worldviews, ethics, and or organizations, that relates humanity to supernatural, transcendental, spiritual, or SECULAR standards for behavior.

However, there is no scholarly consensus over what precisely constitutes a religion.  Humanism is a religion comprised of a complex world view, associated with a set of moral assumptions, acceptable behaviors, and beliefs, that establishes a system of acceptable social behavior.  Humanism is a system of social and moral practices which its adherents religiously maintain and apply to their chosen lifestyle. 

Humanism maintains an ideological rejection of a supernatural God; while, embracing the belief that Mankind is God, the only supreme being and source for establishing moral conduct and societal behavior.  Humanism is the worlds oldest apostate religion... man making himself a god... as Adam and Eve once did.

The term 'Humanism' was coined by theologian Friedrich Niethammer at the beginning of the 19th century to refer to a system of education based on the study of classical literature ("classical humanism").

Generally, Humanism refers to a perspective that affirms humans as the sole source of mankinds freedom and progress. It views humans as solely responsible for the promotion and development of individuals and emphasizes a concern for man in relation to the world. It sees man as his own redeemer and god.

Note it was a theologian who first coined the word Humanism.  To describe a... religious order that replaced the eternal and etheral God of the Bible, with Man as god...

Humanism is in fact the  defacto religion of the Athiest... The new world order's focus on man as the supreme being in the Earth... Man becoming or replacing God.  This is the ultimate sin, for which Lucifer (the Devil) was cast out of heaven, and Adam out of the Garden of Eden. 

I think the government is sponsoring their own religion it is called liberal, or communism. And you remember from your oath ( to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic( liberalism).

"Separation of church and state" is paraphrased from Thomas Jefferson and used by others in expressing an understanding of the intent and function of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which reads:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

"... but the stupid liberals still want to use that card over and over again."  Exactly, Marxist ideology and doctrine ignore settled law and look for judges and US Attorney's willing to throw these types of cases...

The left and progressives use judicial fiat... to establish new precedent, often reversing our laws and previous court decision supporting the existing law.  Of course, this process is unconstitutional, on its face, as the Courts may not establish law; that is the sole responsibility of Congress. 

However, none of the political class will do what is necessary to reign in such unconstitutional conduct by the Courts... thru massive IMPEACHMENT OF THE JUDICIARY AND US ATTORNEY's... who throw such cases. 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service