Disgusting: CNN attacks Melania and Ivanka Trump for being thin and white

Image result for melania and ivanka trump


Pathetic CNN piece by leftist “journalist” goes off the deep end

Over the last year Donald Trump has increasingly attacked the lies and disinformation coming from corporate media giant CNN which has gone on a public crusade to attack the new president over literally every possible thing.

Now, a new hit piece by the liberal propaganda outlet has targeted both First Lady Melania Trump and First Daughter Ivanka Trump for being faux feminists, or, in other words, not being depressed and ugly enough.

Jill Filipovic, a supposed journalist and extreme leftist “feminist”, starts off her direct attack on both the minds and bodies of the Trump women by attacking President Trump for liking the fact that he was asked a question about his wife.

In liberal feminist land this is apparently a bad thing.

Observers of this White House may be wondering when, exactly, Mrs. Trump became a feminist advocate. Unless you count her general abdication of some archaic and deeply silly first lady duties — Mrs. Trump prefers her New York penthouse over the White House, prompting concerns she won’t adequately oversee flower arrangements and the annual Easter Egg roll — she isn’t exactly a feminist firebrand.

In framing her as an advocate for women’s rights when there is close to zero evidence she has ever actually advocated for women’s rights, Trump told us more about himself than he did about her: Women are good for photo ops, not for real positions of power.

The piece goes on to continually attack both Melania and Ivanka for perceived slights against the liberal feminist orthodoxy before ludicrously implying that if a women attacks the mainstream media then she isn’t a feminist.

You can’t make this insanity up folks.

Dig a little deeper, though, and both Melania and Ivanka don’t look so feminist after all; they look prototypically Trump.

At the rally President Trump held in Florida over the weekend, Melania said that as first lady, she would be supporting initiatives “dear to her heart” which would have an “impact on women and children all around the world”. But in the same rare public address, she borrowed some of her husband’s favorite language, describing the media as “the opposition.”

Whoops. You described the media as the opposition, you are no longer allowed in the liberal feminist club!

Filipovic continues her disgusting hit piece by attacking the women for making money, apparently signaling a new belief in liberal feminism that a woman having a business is an evil part of the patriarchy.

Eventually Filipovic gets to the heart of her deeply hard-left argument. Melania and Ivanka Trump can’t be feminists because they love their husbands, aren’t fat, and happen to be white.

Melania and Ivanka provide good cover for Trump’s misogyny because they’re palatable, conventionally feminine women: They’re docile and poised, they don’t make demands of men, and they are above all conventionally beautiful — white and thin.

This is the type of literal garbage that CNN continues to publish and the establishment wonders why Trump has repeatedly attacked them?!

To recap, CNN is now publishing vile attack pieces in which Ivanka and Melania Trump are attacked over being thin and white. This is what passes as journalism in the corporate media.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/02/27/disgusting-cnn-attacks-mela...

Image result for cnn and nwo cartoon

Views: 1551

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

do your self a favor and boycott CNN and their adertisers

I don't know what advertisers CNN has, I haven't watched it for years.

It's just another example of the lefts lack of substance. Libs always display to the world just how puerile and petty they are.
I think we can assume what Jill Filipovic probably looks like, and it ain't pretty. It wouldn't surprise me if she had a crew cut and manly clothing.

Ha ha, I can just picture that, thanks.

Something like this?

Related image

No, she looks like this;

So I fail to see her reasoning in the article she wrote except to say she's a progressive pettifogger, i.e., leftist lawyer.

Obviously the word "facetious" is over your head.

if cnn thinks that trump is harsh on them now  , just wait after choosing to insult his wife and daughter they may have bitten off more than they can chew

I quit watching CNN a few years ago and never looked back. Wish everybody else would too.

The only way that I can find out what the fake news is saying, is to watch and listen to Fox News ! I can't stomach listening to or watching anything else !

Another great conservative news channel is OAN...One America News. Cable channel. Way less advertisements than FOX. And all the news around the world.....not a bunch of opinion pieces with guests and all. Just straight news. I love it. 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service