Did Paul Ryan Just Admit Obama Wire Tapped Trump?

Views: 763

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ryan works both sides of the isle

little shit need a good slapdown

This is Huge we need to make happen    time to bring down the hammer on the deep states and smash the hell out of them.

I think that Paul Ryan is admitting that the wire tap existed and that nothing came of it... So it appears that President Obama had foreign governments spy on Donald Trump's campaign and they are worried about the Russians messing around with our election when they attempted to do the same thing. And they utilized foreign entities to accomplish this.... Pretty sneaky now isn't it!! That way they could blame it on someone else if they found anything which they did not or it would have been the top story....

Classic Alinsky!  If the Democrats accuse anyone of anything nefarious, you can bet that they are doing whatever that might be.

Image result for paul ryan stabs trump in back

You bet!

Gee, I wonder if "good ole boy" Ryan is still colluding with OWEbama and his minions...take out PRESIDENT Trump, take out VP Pence, next in line...SOH TRAITOR Ryan...no wonder he won't move the OWEbamaTAX repeal forward or the new tax code - he's against both and thinks that when he's POTUS they'll die. TRAITOR!!!!!

Ryan... is a bold face liar and he is working to damage the Trump administration... he needs to be investigated.  What a bunch of double speak and stuttering... caught with his pants down and still obfuscates. 

Ryan is not part of President Trump's fan club, Ryan is a NEVER TRUMP No matter what Ryan says in the back-of-his-Muslim-loving-mind he is saying 'I can lye to the American people and get away with if it first off I am a Muslim and secondly I am in Congress'

The White House can call for a congressional investigation but there will be nothing to come out of it except a waste of  tax money

There's a special place for politicians like Paul Ryan.

The White House

“The torch is now in our hands. And we will use it to light up the world.”
– President Donald J. Trump

Earlier this week, President Donald J. Trump stood in front of America and introduced a new chapter of American greatness; one full of prosperity, safety, and innovation.

Building on his successful first 40 days in office, President Trump laid out bold plans to improve infrastructure, bolster national security, and ensure all Americans can achieve the American dream.

President Trump’s speech resonated with legislators and Americans alike:
  • “Tonight, an optimistic President shared a bold agenda to get America back on track and restore the American dream for everyone.” –Congressman Kenny Marchant (TX-24)
  • “President Trump campaigned on a promise of making America great again, and tonight he offered a bold, uplifting vision for how to reach that goal – one that every American can share in.” –Congresswoman Diane Black (TN-06)
  • “President Trump is taking action to fulfill the commitments he made to the American people.” –Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO)
  • “Genuinely one of the most powerful moments I can remember from a presidential speech.” –Charlie Sykes, MSNBC
Tens of thousands of Americans gave us input before the President addressed the Nation. We listened because we want to hear directly from Americans like you. Please take just a few seconds and let us know your opinions on President Trump’s speech and vision for the future.

Share Your Thoughts

Tuesday night wasn’t about President Trump – it was about all Americans. It was about looking to the future, instead of dwelling on the past. It was about dreaming big, seizing the moment, and never giving up.

President Trump will fight for this country and every American until the fight is won. As he said, “The time for small thinking is over.” So let’s think big. Let’s dare to win again. And let’s keep on winning, TOGETHER.

Share Your Thoughts

Privacy Policy   Contact the White House




Reporter Kicked Out Of Michelle Obama
Conference For Violating ‘Black Girl Code’

The Black Entertainment Television channel recently hosted a conference in south Florida for black women known as “Leading Women Defined,” which featured a casual conversation between former first lady Michelle Obama and former senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett.

But according to the New York Post’s Page Six, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who was in attendance was booted from the remainder of the conference after she wrote an article about some of the comments Obama had made during the discussion.

Robin Givhan, a fashion critic and staff writer for The Washington Post, documented the highlights of the friendly chat between Obama and Jarrett.

Some of the highlights of the conversation included the former first lady’s thoughts on President Donald Trump’s inauguration as the Obamas prepared to leave the White House, the role she played during the 2008 election, her difficulty settling in as “the spouse” to the president, how she described her White House garden as a “subversive act” to garner trust with the public and her upcoming memoir. Of course Givhan also wrote about what Obama was wearing … after all, she is a fashion critic.

But following the publication of the article, according to Page Six, BET demanded Givhan leave the conference early amid claims that she had violated a “sacred space” by publishing the content of the conversation.

They also canceled a panel discussion that Givhan initially had been asked to moderate.

However, Page Six noted that BET’s claim that Obama’s discussion was “private” and not intended to be shared with anyone else outside the small gathering in attendance didn’t hold up to scrutiny given the fact that BET itself posted clips from the discussion on its site.

Furthermore, Jarrett also posted those clips on social media and told everyone to “tune in” to the network so they could hear what Obama had to say.

Shortly thereafter, the dispute descended into a sharp back-and-forth on social media between Givhan and others who were irked at what she had done, as can be seen on Givhan’s Twitter feed.

Several of her critics asserted that the conversation had been “off-the-record” — an assertion Givhan flatly denied — and one user claimed the reporter had “violated a sacred trust” between black women.

Another said what she had done was a “complete violation of journalistic ethics and Black girl code, all at once,” while still another asserted through a hashtag that Givhan was “#notoneofus,” as if she were being banished from the exclusive realm of accepted professional black women.

For their part, a BET representative told Page Six that Givhan had been “invited as a guest (not working press) to moderate a fashion panel,” and noted that her travel and lodging expenses had been paid for by the network.

“She was made aware that it was an intimate conversation in a sacred space of sisterhood and fellowship,” the rep added.

Neither Givhan nor representatives for Obama responded to requests for comment on the report from Page Six.

If the WaPo reporter really was instructed ahead of time that the conversation between Obama and Jarrett was “off the record” and a private affair, but published anyway, then BET was justified in booting her from the remainder of the conference — though the mean-spirited commentary she received on social media still crossed the line.

But if Givhan received no prior warning on the matter — and given the fact that BET itself published the conversation later — then this is just a major display of hypocrisy and unnecessary infighting.

What do you think?


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service