DHS Johnson Also Used Personal Email To Hide Invasion, Anti-USA Plotting

Paul Ryan claims he would take legal action against any president who exceeded their authority. It’s a claim that diametrically conflicts with his record as Speaker thus far and his obedient service to the outlaw squatting in our White House. But what the heck, Americans love redemption, Mr. Ryan. Go ahead and impeach Obama and Jihadi Jeh Johnson for this one and maybe we’ll forget about the innumerable failures you’ve accumulated over the past 8 months, just maybe.

Judicial Watch has sued for and finally obtained 693 pages of Homeland Security records which prove that DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson and 28 of his agency officials were given an exclusion from a security-based directive not to used government computers to access personal web-based email accounts. Additionally, they lied to Rep Scott Perry (R-PA) in the official agency response when questioned about it.

DHS initially failed to comply with FOIA requests for the information, obstructing the people’s right to know what their criminal government is up to, as is common, standard operating procedure. Bloomberg News had reported that 29 high-level Homeland Security officials, including Johnson, had sought and obtained exemptions from a February 2014 agency-wide ban on the use of web-based email systems.

There were internal warnings of the risks of malicious attacks but they were ignored in the interest of convenience and the political nature of some correspondence. Convenience was the reason that Johnson cited, that he liked to be able to check his personal email during the day. It was more convenient for Hillary Clinton to put the nation at risk as well. They share the same priorities. 

In a real job you’re expected to work during the day and check your personal email on your own time. Johnson doesn’t have a real job; he’s a high-level anti-American operative. His personal email was likely serving the same purpose as Hillary Clinton’s, giving him a means by which to conduct his anti-American activities free of the threat of discovery.

Included in the documents received by Judicial Watch was a warning memorandum which stated specifically that there had been 14 Trojan-Horse attacks in August 2013 and 25 attacks in December 2013 on Homeland Security computer networks. This subversive ass, who went ahead and did it anyway, is also in charge of America’s Cyber Security. Why is he not in prison or under investigation already, Mr. Ryan?

read more:


Views: 433

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ryan just grabs his ankles and kisses butt only if it is marked DEM.

Ryan is a major part of the problem.. he certainly has not proven up to the task as Speaker or a Federal Representative... after 18yrs in office he has intricately entwined with the system of corruption in DC. 

Wisconsin, please give this deviant the boot and send him walking during the Primary.

There is and has been a "despotic government" that has taken over in Washington dc.  As long as everyone is doing nothing but complaining about it, it will continue to fester. Ryan is a minion of the oblamea regime. Insane/hussian is very well protected by his inner circle, and those just outside the inner circle. #1 reason why their woodenheaded sorros puppet is so hell bent on gun confiscation: Unarmed Citizens are helpless subjects being herded into the boxcars. Do we not have a Right as US Citizens to demand the removal of despots?  There is no strategy for US, the gov/dictatorship has their plans in place, the isis and others that hussian let into the USA, they are his "army" against us. God help US!

Ryan has been AWOL from his beginning.

Without real patriots that put country before party, nothing in our corrupt government will change.

Enough! Just demand ZERO immigration. We need to get our house in order.

Jeb Johnson is a Czar for Obama in DHS so is it any great stretch for him & his 'flunkies' to get an Exzempt Card' from Obama

No one is supposed to be above the law... getting an Exempt Card too operate outside of the law is lawless... and criminal on its surface.  All Federal Employees are subject to the Law.

That may be, Colonel, but they side step it at every opportunity.  They even WRITE 'laws' which omit themselves from participating!  We need to GET THEM ALL OUT, and start again from 'scratch'.

We need to get ALL Muslims out of our White House!

Good place to START!

Who in D.C. might be able to pass a "REAL" polygraph test? I think Putin would stand a better chance then must of these scumbags in office! Hell is going to be one busy place when these crooks pass.....




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service