DHS: Don’t Call ISIS ‘Islamic’: We Won’t Associate Terrorism with Islam

It can only be described as both ludicrous and insensitive. Just days after a Muslim terrorist shot up two military recruitment centers , killing five servicemen in Chattanooga, TN, DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson told the media and high-ranking government officials to not mention the word “Islam” when talking about ISIS or terrorism.

Johnson made these comments at a national security conference July 23.  Ryan Lizza, Washington correspondent for The New Yorker, moderated the event centering on the U.S.’s strategy for Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

read more:

http://mrc.org/articles/dhs-dont-call-isis-islamic-we-wont-associat...

Views: 727

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 You do double talk a lot, I show evidence of Islam with the UN, and then, now you say:

I don't support the UN.

 Once the funds have been destroyed and all the little "O" NGOs funds are legislated out of America, they will end, one way or the other they will.

 Oh, you didn't know that there is new Legislation to end the funds by NGOs here in America to the UN, it will also come to a end.

 Then we can find better use of that building in New York, or turn it into scrap.

I posted my posiiotn on the UN earlier... read at: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/xn/detail/4301673:Comment:4688444

Stop, take a deep breath.. the world isn't going to pass away before you realize that I posted my reseponse long ago... and you were to busy throwing a hissy fit to know.

European Global Migration Compact, I just love the sound of that...:)

To bad there is no such entity as the European GLobal Migration Compact...

It would be so nice if you two would stop sniping at each other; seriously, don't we have other more important things to discuss and work on? As for the UN, if the USA would simply "stop" funding them, altogether, we could hasten their departure; they are an enemy of the USA and always have been, we just weren't smart enough to understand it for a very long time!
That palatial structure, with those marvelous waterfront views would make a superbly wonderful home/hospital center for our veterans, especially for those who are homeless, or in need. I haven't been on board, here, for quite a long while, but I have never seen any members, especially Col. Nelson, who do support anything about the "unglued nations", nor most of their members.
It would be a wonderful thing, if we could get rid of that blood-sucking institutions and ALL of their foreign diplomats, who flaunt our laws and assert their "diplomatic immunity" every chance they get. Those people should be given 72 hours to pack up and get out of the country, Their sumptuous homes and apartments would probably solve the entire homeless situation of NYC and then some. Just imagine what that could be like. Nice chatting with all of you again.
Just one other thing; if the US did stop funding "unglued nations" altogether, they would probably cease to exist, since we provide more that 25% of their total budget- -somehow, I thinks it would be very difficult for them to continue on just 75%. I could be wrong, but I never studied economics in depth, just standard math classes - - but, I can still balance my check book and make out a tax return!!

Think on that for a moment... 50-75 failed states in the world overnight.  Chaos, with fome of those nations having the capability to strike US Interests on a global basis... What are the true consequences of abandoning hundreds of millions or Billions of the worlds poor? What are the choices and consequences of those choices?

I don't support the UN... I do however understand it is going nowhere... and if America withdraws we will have no influence over its programs or policies. If we kick the UN out of NY they will open in the EU and immediately begin to isolate our economy while engaging in direct and indirect sanctions.

I prefer to remain in the UN and to use our VETO to stop any further erosion of national sovereignty... In the past it has been the position of the leftist in our government to acquiesce to the UN... that has stopped since Trump became President and we already see some great changes in the UN... now is not the time to withdraw from the UN let Trump cut its throat... defunding its Marxist programs and vetoing others. 

Think on that for a moment

And of course, typos are bound to follow - -"I thinks it would be" sounds pretty silly!

 Mr. Nelson will be back, he is a soldier, but, we stand against the UN, Yellow Vest Protest In America, Rising Up against a evil: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/yellow-vest-protest-coming...

Ronald want be back for a while Hank, I got my wiggle on and I am all ways ready to dance.

LOL Tif

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

Florida Sheriff — “I Will Not Enforce Assault Weapons Ban, Neither Will Most Sheriffs”

Dennis Lemma, who is the Sheriff in Central Florida’s Seminole County, told a group of 2nd Amendment activists recently that he would not enforce an assault weapons ban that could soon become Florida law if the “Ban Assault Weapons Now” amendment passes in the Sunshine State.

According to News965, the ban has the following specifications.

The amendment proposed in the state legislature would ban possession of assault weapons, which are defined as “semiautomatic rifles and shotguns capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition at once, either in fixed or detachable magazine, or any other ammunition feeding device.”

Lemma, an ardent supporter of the 2nd Amendment and a first term sheriff who is running for re-election, said this about whether or not he would enforce such a law.

“It’s not only that I wouldn’t, the majority of sheriffs across the state would not do it,” Lemma said in the video. It’s up to the sheriffs what they are willing to enforce.”

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service