DHS: Don’t Call ISIS ‘Islamic’: We Won’t Associate Terrorism with Islam

It can only be described as both ludicrous and insensitive. Just days after a Muslim terrorist shot up two military recruitment centers , killing five servicemen in Chattanooga, TN, DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson told the media and high-ranking government officials to not mention the word “Islam” when talking about ISIS or terrorism.

Johnson made these comments at a national security conference July 23.  Ryan Lizza, Washington correspondent for The New Yorker, moderated the event centering on the U.S.’s strategy for Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

read more:

http://mrc.org/articles/dhs-dont-call-isis-islamic-we-wont-associat...

Views: 722

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 You do double talk a lot, I show evidence of Islam with the UN, and then, now you say:

I don't support the UN.

 Once the funds have been destroyed and all the little "O" NGOs funds are legislated out of America, they will end, one way or the other they will.

 Oh, you didn't know that there is new Legislation to end the funds by NGOs here in America to the UN, it will also come to a end.

 Then we can find better use of that building in New York, or turn it into scrap.

I posted my posiiotn on the UN earlier... read at: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/xn/detail/4301673:Comment:4688444

Stop, take a deep breath.. the world isn't going to pass away before you realize that I posted my reseponse long ago... and you were to busy throwing a hissy fit to know.

European Global Migration Compact, I just love the sound of that...:)

To bad there is no such entity as the European GLobal Migration Compact...

It would be so nice if you two would stop sniping at each other; seriously, don't we have other more important things to discuss and work on? As for the UN, if the USA would simply "stop" funding them, altogether, we could hasten their departure; they are an enemy of the USA and always have been, we just weren't smart enough to understand it for a very long time!
That palatial structure, with those marvelous waterfront views would make a superbly wonderful home/hospital center for our veterans, especially for those who are homeless, or in need. I haven't been on board, here, for quite a long while, but I have never seen any members, especially Col. Nelson, who do support anything about the "unglued nations", nor most of their members.
It would be a wonderful thing, if we could get rid of that blood-sucking institutions and ALL of their foreign diplomats, who flaunt our laws and assert their "diplomatic immunity" every chance they get. Those people should be given 72 hours to pack up and get out of the country, Their sumptuous homes and apartments would probably solve the entire homeless situation of NYC and then some. Just imagine what that could be like. Nice chatting with all of you again.
Just one other thing; if the US did stop funding "unglued nations" altogether, they would probably cease to exist, since we provide more that 25% of their total budget- -somehow, I thinks it would be very difficult for them to continue on just 75%. I could be wrong, but I never studied economics in depth, just standard math classes - - but, I can still balance my check book and make out a tax return!!

Think on that for a moment... 50-75 failed states in the world overnight.  Chaos, with fome of those nations having the capability to strike US Interests on a global basis... What are the true consequences of abandoning hundreds of millions or Billions of the worlds poor? What are the choices and consequences of those choices?

I don't support the UN... I do however understand it is going nowhere... and if America withdraws we will have no influence over its programs or policies. If we kick the UN out of NY they will open in the EU and immediately begin to isolate our economy while engaging in direct and indirect sanctions.

I prefer to remain in the UN and to use our VETO to stop any further erosion of national sovereignty... In the past it has been the position of the leftist in our government to acquiesce to the UN... that has stopped since Trump became President and we already see some great changes in the UN... now is not the time to withdraw from the UN let Trump cut its throat... defunding its Marxist programs and vetoing others. 

Think on that for a moment

And of course, typos are bound to follow - -"I thinks it would be" sounds pretty silly!

 Mr. Nelson will be back, he is a soldier, but, we stand against the UN, Yellow Vest Protest In America, Rising Up against a evil: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/yellow-vest-protest-coming...

Ronald want be back for a while Hank, I got my wiggle on and I am all ways ready to dance.

LOL Tif

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service