Dem Rep Waters: Trump ‘Investigation’ Underway; Evidence Not Required for Impeachment

Image result for maxine waters memeMonday on CNN’s “Newsroom,” when asked about her comments last week stating that her “greatest desire” would be to impeach President Donald Trump, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) said investigations had “already started” and that some of the investigation leads to the “possibility of impeachment.”

Partial transcript as follows:

BALDWIN: You are making news today saying Donald Trump’s actions are leading himself to possible impeachment. Explain to me why you are going there two weeks into his presidency.

WATERS:  First of all, just let me say these are not normal times. We have a president who is creating chaos and division. So many questions about his conflict of interest. Lies about whether or not he separated himself from the businesses he claimed he would separate himself from. Not showing his tax returns. Putting his arms around Putin, defending Putin, working with the Kremlin. I want to know, and a lot of people want to know was there collusion between Putin and the Kremlin and this president as they hacked our DNC and our DCCC and some of us. We want to know how deep does that go.

BALDWIN: Congresswoman, what’s the evidence. forgive me for jumping in, but what is the evidence that would lead to impeachment here?

WATERS: That’s what I’m telling you. We have investigations that have already started. There is an investigation in the Senate Intelligence yes, in the House you have investigations going on in several places in several ways. This man is questionable. and what I’m saying is, because we are suspicious, many of us about who he is, where he came from, what his actions are and all of his conflicts and this business of loving Putin and the Kremlin so much, we have to find out more about him. And some of that I think leads to the possibility of impeachment. And I think that’s legitimate to say given everything we know at this point.

BALDWIN: I understand on the investigation. But you know, you do have to find evidence before using such a huge word, such a tremendous word as the I word, the I in impeachment.

WATERS: No, no, no. no, no, no. Let me tell you what you are saying is this. You are saying that you don’t ordinarily hear members of Congress who would do what I’m doing, who began to talk about impeachment because they would fear that perhaps they were not going to get the information other people would think they are acting too hastily.

read more:

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/02/06/dem-rep-waters-trump-inve...

Views: 1112

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

THERE GOES MAXINE WATERS AGAIN!  TALKING WITH HER HEAD UP HER A$$!  JUST "WHO" CARES ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMPS BUSINESS OR HIS TAX RETURNS?  DOES ANY OF THAT MATTER IN HIS EFFORTS TO "CLEAN UP THE MESS",  THE HALF-BREED OBAMA CREATED WITH MAXINE WATERS' HELP?!  MAXINE, GO BACK AND CLEAN UP THE CESS POOL OF THE DISTRICT YOU REPRESENT IN "CESS POOL ANGELES"!  

How soon they forget the 1st thing Obama did was pay millions in attorney's fees to SEAL ALL his records and documents, no neither side could look further into that fraud! Nothing to see here folks! And all this commotion over Trumps cabinet appointments, how many CZARS did Obama appoint?? Some of us have looooong memories, not 8 second attention span media hacks hope for!

Their messiah is not required to report to them, to the Congress, or to anyone - even to God Himself. obama is proof against everything in existence and he is not required even to show proof of his eligibility to run for President of the U.S.A. much less to actually hold that office.

Face it, folks, obama is their god and hillary clinton is his prophet. People do not question their gods (unless, that is, the God that they are addressing happens to be the only actual, living God, Jehovah; Him they will ignore and even willfully disobey).

oh yes she is that stupid

Waters and Pelosi could be twins.   Dumb and dumber.

Trump is the most transparent president ever. He released all information we would ever want. Besides, he tells the country what's up and his word is good enough. Who needs proof when we have Trump's word? Only losers would want to get verification for Trump's claims.

Good try but no cigar progressive troll. The fact is that Mr. Obama was the least transparent president in modern history since Wilson. Hillary would have been worse and also the most corrupt.

@Roberto My bad. I should have written this to make you happy: Trump is the least transparent president ever. He didn't release any information we wanted. Besides, he doesn't tell the country what's up and his word is no good. Who doesn't need proof against Trump's word? Only losers don't want to get verification for Trump's claims. - I hope this makes you happy now, troll!

Mr. Benitez,

 President Obama, was never transparent, a mater a fact some issues have raised its ugly head and the secrets will be exposed.

 As of now both political parties are so entangled with CFR, and to find information blocked during the elections by google servers, 

 For me to compare Obama to any President would be a act of insanity. The whole system is a lie, and Trump is not keeping his word.

Maxine Waters once again demonstrates that she's a moron. How could anyone as stupid as she ever got elected?

BY EVEN MORE STUPID PEOPLE.......

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service