Dem Mayor De Blasio Insists Parade Should Be Held For Himself After “Missteps” Taken

Democrat Mayor of New York, Bill de Blasio is so puffed up with himself that he told New York magazine that he's done so great that “you’d assume they’d be having parades out in the streets.”

Democrat Mayor of New York, Bill de Blasio is so puffed up with himself that he told New York magazine that he’s done so great that “you’d assume they’d be having parades out in the streets.”

The Mayor of New York, Bill de Blasio, told reporters of the New York magazine that he’s doing such a great job, residents should be “having parades out in the streets.” While boasting of his so-called successes, the arrogant mayor said that if it weren’t for the “time of history we’re living in,” perhaps the assumption of his awesomeness would cause spontaneous demonstrations among the happy peasants.

However, a Quinnipiac University study released in July show de Blasio’s approval rating plummeted from 50 to 42 percent over the summer. Tooting his own horn, the liberal mayor said “When I think about how crime’s gone down for four years, graduation rates up, test scores up, more jobs than ever in our history—I think, ‘Wow, just that quick profile, and candidate anywhere would want it.’”

The entire article is chock full of his boasting, arrogant personality and his dismissal of the controversies that have surrounded his term in office. He’s actually seen with a very smug expression on his face indicative of his attitude.

The four criminal investigations he was under last year he referred to as "missteps." De Blasio is convinced of his superiority.

The four criminal investigations he was under last year he referred to as “missteps.” De Blasio is convinced of his superiority.

The real story is the fact that New York voters are split evenly on whether or not de Blasio will be elected again. Forty-six percent want to give him another go round, but another 46 percent want him out. He says that despite his “missteps” and “insufficiencies as a communicator” these people are just taking out frustrations with the economic climate on their leaders.

Last Year, the liberal New York Times listed the “leader’s” troubles and the excessive amount of simultaneous investigations de Blasio faced. Five separate inquiries, which involved at least six different federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, were conducted last year. Four of them focused on possible criminal behavior.

Of course, criminal investigations into democrat conduct isn’t new. The shocking part was that they all were happening at the same time. Each one involved money, something liberals are also known to absolutely love.

According to de Blasio, the "everyday people" don't care that he uses two gas-guzzling SUV's to go to his gym. Apparently, saving resources isn't for the likes of him, it's just for "everyday people."

According to de Blasio, the “everyday people” don’t care that he uses two gas-guzzling SUV’s to go to his gym. Apparently, saving resources isn’t for the likes of him, it’s just for “everyday people.”

Although a number of associates were arrested, de Blasio came off clean. He told the magazine “there wasn’t anything wrong.” The mayor also reneged on his promise to raise money to pay for his own legal representation concerning the investigations. He initially promised to pay $2 million, but he announced in June that the city would have to foot the bill. He wasn’t paying.

The mayor’s conversation, which no one on the left seems to have a problem with, was interspersed with such belittling phrases that every city resident should be offended. When discussing his gas-guzzling trips to the gym he said “everyday people do not raise that concern” to him.

The “everyday people,” he said. Does that mean that he, as an elected “leader” is above such proletariat masses? More arrogance in a public servant would be hard to find.

During the interview, de Blasio said that President Trump was a "racist," and that the most important part of the discussion was to ensure that his mayoral re-election happens.

During the interview, de Blasio said that President Trump was a “racist,” and that the most important part of the discussion was to ensure that his mayoral re-election happens.

De Blasio also suggested that the tabloid journalism from The New York Post, wouldn’t be “around too much longer.” He added, “the same culture that vilified the word liberal, effectively, became too ascendant. It’s now crashing on the rocks.” His assertions and assumptions know no bounds.

In the interview he called President Trump “spoiled” and “profoundly racist.” However, a number of other people who actually know the president don’t say that. Many people remember Jesse Jackson praising Donald Trump for his “risk to make things better.”

Perhaps de Blasio has personal information and he isn’t just spreading a false narrative to instigate unstable liberals who might try to harm people. His smarmy interview doesn’t really indicate that, but who knows?

De Blasio also spoke briefly about his feud with Governor Cuomo, saying that some of the rift is personal. “I’m saying some of this is structural, some of this is ideological, some of this is just naturally what happens when people disagree on an issue,” the mayor explained.

He declined to discuss anything else about Cuomo, focusing on what really matters—himself. De Blasio said “I’m talking about this year. I’m in a mayoral election this year.”

That’s right, he is. Hopefully the 46 percent of voters in New York who want this democrat out of office will increase. If he gets his way, he’ll be living it up for another four years in Gracie Mansion, while the “everyday people” pay for it.

Image result for OMG seriously?

Views: 38

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Image result for pride goeth before a fall

Dem Mayor De Blasio Confirms: Arrested DREAMers Avoid Police Action To Hide From ICE

The NYPD isn't fingerprinting illegal aliens who protest the president's lawful move to stop DACA. The calculated move is designed to prevent ICE from obtaining information on criminal residents.

The NYPD isn’t fingerprinting illegal aliens who protest the president’s lawful move to stop DACA. The calculated move is designed to prevent ICE from obtaining information on criminal residents.

A group of people gathered at Trump Tower to protest the president’s decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) executive order on Tuesday. This move is not entirely unexpected. However, the real travesty is that New York Police Department (NYPD) officers aren’t fingerprinting any of the violent agitators because they don’t want to give the U.S. Customs and Immigration (ICE) agency the ability to deport illegal aliens.

That’s right. The NYPD, confirmed by Mayor de Blasio, is joining the ranks of sanctuary cities who will not comply with federal law. Exactly like their slave-owning progenitors, democrats today refuse to adhere to national legislation concerning the deportation of unlawful residents.

At least 34 people were arrested outside Trump Tower yesterday evening among a crowd of proud criminals. Holding signs that proclaimed, “undocumented—unafraid” the group of agitators added to their illegal activities by blocking traffic and generally causing chaos.

Mayor de Blasio confrimed that no protesters, either at Trump Tower or on the Brooklyn Bridge, will be fingerprinted as a protection. So basically, no criminals will face consequences for their actions.

Mayor de Blasio confrimed that no protesters, either at Trump Tower or on the Brooklyn Bridge, will be fingerprinted as a protection. So basically, no criminals will face consequences for their actions.

Instead of facing the real consequences of their actions, NYPD Chief of Patrol Terence Monahan explained that the illegals would be processed at the 7th Precinct station house and were to be issued desk tickets. No fingerprinting means no state or federal ICE involvement.

The mayor’s office also confirmed that those who gathered to act unlawful at the Brooklyn Bridge would be ticketed and released, despite the fact that many are on deportation lists.

All across the nation, leftist news outlets are saying that the move will mean that “children” are no longer protected from ICE authorities. However, that’s simply an exaggerated untruth. Of the 800,000 people who have been enjoying amnesty under the Obama executive order, the average age is 25.

The crowd at Trump Tower mainly consisted of illegals. However, just like they've come to expect, in New York, they'll face no punishment for their activity.

The crowd at Trump Tower mainly consisted of illegals. However, just like they’ve come to expect, in New York, they’ll face no punishment for their activity.

In addition, the program issued by an arbitrary, unconstitutional act allowed anyone under the age of 30 to apply, so some of these “children” are about 35-years-old.

One such “immigrant” from Mexico was part of the Trump Tower protest. Sarai Bravo is 24, but almost everyone in her family had already been granted permanent status under the Obama regime. She argues that since she’s already received all the benefits of school and federal help, she should get to stay.

De Blasio, like many other democrats and RINOs, is pandering to the voting bloc. He has an election coming up and wants to secure as many votes from “everyday people” that he can. His office is planning a DACA Day of Action.


View image on Twitter

To the Dreamers of New York City:
We stand with you. We will fight for you.
In solidarity, New York City


Likewise, the Hispanic Federation is hosting a “Know Your Rights” session that will help DACA recipients fight deportation. However, the Federation for American Immigration Reform was satisfied that President Trump kept his word to the American people who overwhelmingly voted him into office.

President Dan Stein said, “The winding down period announced today will not only give DACA recipients time to get their affairs in order, but also gives Congress a unique opportunity to reengage in the immigration debate.”

If these vocal members of congress who are bashing the president for keeping his word really care about these criminals, they’ll try to do something about it. The proof of their bombastic comments will be seen over the next few months.

The blatant disregard for the law demonstrated by these DACA recipients is both disgusting and wrong. The president's move was correct.

The blatant disregard for the law demonstrated by these DACA recipients is both disgusting and wrong. The president’s move was correct.

“President Trump has indicated that he is willing to forge a long-term solution for real immigration reform, but it takes two sides to make a deal. The American public is watching,” said Stein.

The White House proposal will give congress six months to come up with real immigration reform. However, it’s unlikely that they’ll be able to introduce the changes the American people demand. The fact remains that Obama exceeded his authority when he “wrote” the law allowing amnesty. Ten states were ready to take it to federal court, and President Trump simply righted a terrible wrong.

However, NYPD is doing its best to ensure that these illegal aliens stay in the country. By not fingerprinting criminals, they are subverting the law of the land. Perhaps some right-thinking citizens in the city will stand up to such liberal lawlessness.

https://conservativedailypost.com/dem-mayor-de-blasio-confirms-arre...

Image result

DeBlasio is like Hillary always has an excuse.
I can almost invision that when the SHTF and it's to dangerous for deliveries these big Metropolises sanctuary cities will be prisons, nobody allowed out and no deliveries in. The groceries are produced hundreds of miles from the agriculture belts and they will lose. If you want to get rid of a pest take it's food supply away.

And then we'll have the real "Escape from NY", "Escape from L.A.", etc....

Related image

Related image

Image result for de blasio big fat head cartoon

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service