“DEAR SENATOR
clown-SCHUMER…”
by Burt Prelutsky
IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT TO BURT PRELUTSKY ARTICLE, PLEASE MENTION MY NAME RUDY...   Contact Burt at burtprelutsky@icloud.com  

As some of you know, I often write letters to politicians. I do it in the hope that for once they will heed the counsel of someone other than their major donors and their campaign managers, someone who sincerely has the best interests of America at heart. The only time I have ever heard back from one was when I sent a $5 check to President Trump to kick-start the building of his border wall, and he returned the check with his thanks.

But hope springs eternal, even in this cynical heart, so I recently wrote the following to the minority leader of the U.S. Senate:

“Dear Sen. clown-Schumer: For the sake of transparency, I confess that I’m a registered Republican. That’s not because I hold the GOP in particularly high esteem. But these days, it’s enough that they’re not dummycrats-Democrats.

“I didn’t always feel this way. For a long time, I was adummycrats-Democrat. But as Ronald Reagan famously said, ‘I didn’t leave the Party; the Party left me.’

“Frankly, I can’t imagine what your professional life must be like. As a TV writer, I have had to go to work in offices where it took only one person to turn it into a toxic atmosphere. You, on the other hand, go to work and have to spend most of your time with mean-spirited ignoramuses. It’s even worse for Nancy Pulosi. At least as a senator, you don’t have to hold conferences with the likes of scumbag/mad-Maxine Waters, scumbag-Adam Schiff and, in a few months, the commie-Bernie Sanders disciple who will be representing New York’s 14th congressional district.

"Or at least it would be worse if Ms. Pulosi wasn’t every bit as nasty and feebleminded as her associates.

“I could be mistaken, but you seem brighter than most of your Senate colleagues. As such, doesn’t it trouble you when you have to react automatically and negatively to everything that President Trump says and does?

“Surely, as an American, you had to be hoping that the Singapore Summit would lead to Kim Jong-un’s denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula. But no sooner had it ended than you were on TV insisting it had been a waste of time. You know you would not have said that if it had been Barack liar-nObama at the meeting. You even had the audacity to claim that the agreement that sent $150 billion in cash to Iran, the number one sponsor of terrorism and the number one enemy of Israel, was in our best interest. Aren’t you the least bit ashamed of that?

“You can’t possibly believe that open borders are a good thing for America. Understand, I’m not saying that there aren’t major Republican donors who want an endless supply of cheap labor, but how do the rest of us benefit from having a constant stream of unskilled illiterates streaming into our country?

“Even in terms of purely political strategy, adopting the Never-Trump resistance makes no sense. When you insist that everything this administration does is bad, you turn yourself into the very stupid boy who cried ‘Wolf!’ on an hourly basis. Why not at least appear to put partisanship aside and build the wall? At least, if it was constructed by union workers, you’d gain favor in that quarter. Those really are ‘shovel-ready’ jobs, unlike the fantasies liar-nObama kept referring to when he blew a billion dollars on outfits like Solyndra.

“Politically, it would be a windfall for your side. It would look like statesmanship, even if it were merely a ploy to helpdummycrats-Democrats get elected in November. Polls show that even those Latinos who are American citizens don’t want the invasion to continue. Why would they? After all, it’s their wages that are being undercut, their schools and health clinics that are being overwhelmed and their kids who are being victimized by MS-13 and their equally vicious sidekicks.

“You’re not a young man, Senator clown-Schumer. You are, like me, on the downhill side of your life. When the rabbi sends you off to the great unknown, would you prefer that he be able to say with a straight face: ‘Today, we are putting to rest a man of principle who did everything in his power to leave America a better place than he found it’ or ‘Today, we’re burying just another cheap political hack. Now let’s eat’?

“p.s. When you’re addressing the media, I would suggest you ditch the stiffs who always insist on huddling behind you. I know those other senators want to be seen on camera, but they just look dumb and, worse yet from your perspective, they make you look like a mob boss who can’t go anywhere without a bunch of goofy-looking bodyguards. Feel free to share this bit of free advice with Sen. McConnell.

“p.p.s. While I have your attention, could you please do something about this lunacy called dual-citizenship? Citizenship either means what we were both brought up to think it means, which is whole-hearted fidelity to a single nation, or it means nothing at all. Sort of like a nation that lacks the will to protect its own borders from foreign invaders. Dual-citizenship, when you get right down to it, is the equivalent of bigamy. Regards, Burt Prelutsky”

I’ll be sure to keep you posted if he gets back to me.
IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT TO BURT PRELUTSKY ARTICLE, PLEASE MENTION MY NAME RUDY...   Contact Burt at burtprelutsky@icloud.com  

Views: 26

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

yes he is a clown and a bigger liar and a socalist

I especially like the last sentence. 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service