Daniel Bongino: An open letter to the establishment GOP, I am serving you with divorce papers

I am serving you with divorce papers. For those who are unaware of what happened, the establishment wing of the Party has openly declared war on the grassroots. 

For those who say this fight is hurting the Republican "brand" I reply; it is those on both sides of the aisle who have betrayed their principles in the name of Party, that have destroyed their "brands". 

As for the GOP, we used to stand for something; a lean, effective government, vibrant and robust individual liberty, and a passionate defense of the value of hard work and a commensurate respect for your wages by consistently fighting for your right to keep more of them. Where do you stand now? I know where the grassroots does.

This is our Party and we will demonstrate to the people we hope to represent that there is a group of people out there who refuse to be part of any "managed decline". We will only be part of a spectacular American resurrection. 

America's best days are ahead and you and your fellow insiders and cronyists and "Party before country" loyalists, on both sides of the aisle, can bathe in your titles and power now but understand that I, and many others, have dedicated our lives to draining the dirty water from the bathtub.

Consider yourself served.

https://www.facebook.com/dan.bongino/posts/570403906385708

Views: 884

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Good one.

I think you are correct.

It's about time ain't it?

Well spoken/written , my dear fellow Marylander.  By the way, Dan, would you please ask Stenny Hoyer to personally deliver that written message to the "establishment?"  We both know exactly where he lives in St. Mary's County.  W can deliver it to Stenny first, if you so choose!   Let's Roll!

Stenny Hoyer has been able to send a lot of Defense money to Pax River, Md. St. Marys County. That is the only reason he stays in power. St. Mary's County as the name implies has a lot of Catholic residents. The Churches there used to put up crosses on their lawn representing # of abortions each day! Maybe they have woke up and will vote Republican in 2014 if they want to stop the killing of unborn babies!

Robert, I am not sure that what you write is entirely correct.  It MAY be in part, but not totally.  Remember that Prince George's County is in his district and that county is about 100% Democratic.  Take that county away from him and his grip on the office is greatly diminished.  There is more that I would love to write, but that is enough for now. 

John- yes and no! St. Mary's and Charles County and part of Prince George's and Arundal are in the 5 th District which he represents. He is not a honorable man and has no intregrity when it comes to raising money to stay in power!

Right the hell on !! and said so eloquently !! America its time to take our country back !  

NOW GET READY TO SERVE THEM THEIR JAIL PAPERS

Good job Dan Bongino ! Draining that much dirty water from the bathtub will spawn a tidal wave...watching all the rats swim should be entertaining.

Thank You Daniel for saying what needs to be said ...WE THE PEOPLE HAVE HAD IT WITH YOU ALL IN WASH. ......TIME TO CLEAN HOUSE AND TAKE BACK AMERICA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I've seen this guy on a couple of interviews with Fox News talking heads and I really like him. Only time will tell.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service