Congress Fixes "Sexist" Draft - Votes To Require Women To Register For Selection

The House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday approved by a narrow margin an amendment to a defense bill to require women to register for the draft.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, a Republican from California, proposed the amendment to lift the restriction on women registering for the selective service at a committee-wide mark-up session of the proposed fiscal 2017 National Defense Authorization Act.

"Here is why I think this is important; it doesn't matter in this debate whether you think women should be in the infantry or be in special operations," Hunter said during the session on Wednesday night. "I personally don't. If we had that vote in committee today I would vote against women being in infantry and special operations.

"But this is not about women serving in the infantry. The administration has made that decision unilaterally disregarding what the Marine Corps and special operations communities have said. But that's not what this is about. Right now the draft is sexist. Right now the draft only drafts young men. Women are excluded."

Hunter went on to explain that his generation has not seen the kind of warfare that requires a draft.

"We have not been in Vietnam or Korea, or World War II, where you have thousands of people a day dying, where you have massed artillery fires, where you have massed tank units rolling through people's lines we have not seen that," Hunter said.

"That is what a draft is for," he added. "A draft is because people started dying in the infantry and you need more bodies in infantry, that is what a draft if for. The administration would like to make this decision on its own. I think we should make this decision."

Hunter, who requested a roll-call vote on the measure, ended up voting against his own amendment. The amendment passed 32 votes to 30 votes, with strong support from female committee members.

The proposal prompted several lawmakers to weigh in on the issue.

Committee Chairman Mac Thornberry, a Republican from Texas, made point in saying the president will not decide on the selective service.

"The only ones who can decide this are us because it is in law or the courts, and there is a court case that is ongoing through the process that challenges selective service being male-only," he said.

"We have a study that requires the defense department to come back to us about the selective service system about what the benefits are, about what the alternatives may be so that we have a fuller picture of the draft and what it would mean to keep it or to do away with it or to include females in it," he added.

read more:

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/04/28/house-panel-approves-...

Views: 297

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I have NO PROBLEM with women VOLUNTEERING for anything.  I have a MAJOR problem with women being TOLD what to do.  NO DRAFTING women.  PERIOD.  End of discussion.

But women want equality. I say give it to them. However it has to be across the board. It can't just be equality in the areas that are most comfortable and beneficial. Equality means you get equal pay for an equal job etc. It also means that if men have to register for SS then women (remember, you wanted equality) must also register. If it comes to a war and a draft---remember that equality you wanted? The bus leaves for Paris Island MCTC and MCAGCTC 29 Palms, CA at 0800. YOU ARE NOW EQUAL. BE THERE!!!!!

The only bad thing that I seen was at the beginning of the first Gulf War at least three women didn't want to go in while being  in the reserves .  I think one outright refused, and two GOT PREGNANT.  That is for the  ones that don't want to go in.

Bryan why don't we let the Woman speak for themselves, and decide for themselves. Your major problem is telling them that they  can't be drafted and speaking for them.  I seen women in the Navy when I was on active duty, and they didn't care about being there, or being told what to do by their superiors either. 

The problem is there a double standard in the military.  Women aren't being held to the same standard of physical fitness as men.........so I think they'll be endangering lives, because they won't be capable of doing some of the things that HAVE to be done in a war....  If they can meet the same standards the men have always had to meet.................then fine.

Marilyn , excellent point.

Females should not complain about the draft.  They petitioned for equal rights and everything else under the sun and they were granted their wishes, now they must learn to take the good along with the bad.  This draft issue is totally a non-sexist issue that will place males and females on equal footing.  That is of course someone does not come along and starts to dummy down the requirements and procedures.   

Where have you been?   They've been dummying down the requirements for some time now...

This generation with all its whining, carping and complaining I can only imagine what will happen on the front lines.  I wonder if the enemy will curb their microaggressions or provide transgender facilities and a safe space for the little darlings ?

That is true about the younger generation. Plus over in Israel both serve in the  military, and they don't have crybabies to my knowledge .  Me four year navy vet.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service