CNN Anti-Trump Panel Goes Bad When the Wrong Panelists Show Up

It’s no secret that CNN is no friend of President Donald Trump… but even the left-leaning news network couldn’t skew the facts against the president when a panel of “everyday” Americans showed up.

A group of voters were recently assembled in Ohio following the testimony of James Comey. The nine citizens were asked by CNN National Correspondent Gary Tuchman to respond to several questions, and the result was definitely not what the cable network had planned.

“First thing I want to ask you: It is a crime when you testify before Congress to lie,” Tuchman stated in a clear attempt to “prep” the panel. “That is perjury. You can go to prison for it.”

Then, Tuchman asked what the citizens thought. “Raise your hand if you believe James Comey lied at all.” To CNN’s undoubted chagrin, four of the nine panelists put their hands in the air.

“He [Comey] said that Donald Trump, quote, ‘Lies plain and simple,'” continued Tuchman. “Raise your hand if you believe Donald Trump has lied at all about the situation.”

Not a single voter on the panel raised their hand — but then things got even worse for CNN.

The shocked correspondent asked for an explanation of why some panelists didn’t raise their hand at either question. A woman in the front row gave an answer that the liberal network was absolutely not expecting.

“Well, first of all, things can be distorted and appear like lies,” the plainspoken woman responded.

She then gave the CNN journalist a scolding look. “And I think maybe the media might have distorted some things and now we’re not getting both sides.”

The big names in media have tried for months to destroy President Trump, citing “anonymous sources” and reporting things that turned out to be the complete opposite of the truth.

Americans are no longer taking the bait, and the media shell game no longer works. Citizens trust the mainstream media about as much as they believe James Comey — and that’s not saying a lot.

If you agree with this panel of voters, please share this article on Facebook and Twitter!

What do you think of this panel's response? 

http://conservativetribune.com/cnn-anti-trump-panelists/?utm_source...

Related image

Views: 76

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Thank God that people ARE paying attention.

What was he thinking?   hmmmmm....interesting....I wasn't aware he had that skill

a guess... cnn's intent was to demonstrate how Trump's voters are uniformly delusional. He stressed '9 Trump voters' in the intro, and that was sure to trigger cnn's normal audience into the prescribed frame of mind for the desired perception.

we just don't see it from the frame of mind their normal fully indoctrinated audience does.

How can we possibly see things through their lens of the only right is wrong and the huge wrong is right?

;' /   this is a dilemma I had my last few years of living in the progressive demon's den Austin. My take is you don't want to, other than just enough to recognize the dire danger to common sense and sound logic their delusional frame of mind is. Take it as the real and imminent threat that it is.

sure wish a whole lot more woulda recognized that coming 18 years ago as I did, when it woulda been much easier to shove them all back into the closet where the progressives belong, before they normalized their bizzaro world. 

The metastasis is beyond stage 4 imho.

yeah, normalization is hindsight now - I agree.

AWWWWWWWWWWWWW.....do I detect WHINING?


No audio or cameras in White House press briefing drives CNN’s Jim Acosta to meltdown


In other words, reporters were forced to do their work ‘old school,’ and their hands are hurting from all that typing.

CNN senior White House correspondent Jim Acosta didn’t take kindly to the extra hard labor. In fact, he’s quite horrified at the “bizzare” nature of it all.

Appearing on CNN Newsroom with host Brooke Baldwin, Acosta was quick to express his frustration:

“That’s the White House behind me….It’s bizarre,” Acosta said. “I don’t know what world we’re living in right now, Brooke, where we’re standing at the White House, and they bring us into the briefing room here at the White House and they won’t answer these questions on camera, or let us record the audio. I don’t know why everybody is going along with this.”

Oh, the humanity!


Call me old fashioned but I think the White House of the United States of America should have the backbone to answer questions on camera.


Acosta continued: “The White House is refusing to answer those questions on camera or in any kind of fashion where we can record the audio. My guess is because they want their evasive answers not saved for posterity. That is the only conclusion one could draw. That when they give us answers, that it somehow reads better in print than it could be seen on television or heard over the radio.”

Acosta even predicted how Trump supporters would react to his little temper tantrum:

“And I guess people can say, well, there goes the media again. They’re acting like cry babies because they can’t cover things in the way that they want. But, you know, maybe I’m old-fashioned, Brooke but I believe the White House for the United States should have the questions answered on camera to see what they’re saying and when they don’t do this, they’re doing a disservice to the people to the country.”

“When, you know, Sean Spicer…just comes in and says you can’t record the video or audio from these briefings, that wouldn’t be tolerated at city council meetings or a governor’s press conference….I just don’t know what we’re doing….It’s like we’re just covering bad reality television, is what it feels like now.”

Well, Jim, if we have audio and video, why on earth would we need the likes of YOU?

Watch the exchange below:

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/06/20/no-audio-cameras-white-house...

LMAO, wonder if they can spell or did that go out the window along with truth?

To Jim [crybaby] Acosta; Call me old fashioned, but I think the White House of the United States of America should absolutely ignore and disallow any/all anti-American, FAKE NEWS, hack journalists from entering the walls of the press room.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Breaking:  FBI Admits Comey Leaked Memos 
 That Were Classified   Material! 

The FBI turned over the Comey memos to Congress today after missing their deadline earlier in the week.

Congressional leaders threatened to impeach deep state leaders if they continued to stall on the memos.

Fired FBI Chief James Comey wrote about the memos in his book and leaked the documents to reporters last year. Congress has not yet had a chance to look at the memos — Until tonight.

AND—– THE MEMOS ARE CLASSIFIED!

Meaning Fired FBI Chief James Comey leaked CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS TO THE PRESS.

From the report:

From the DOJ to Congress:

Therefore, pursuant to your request, we are providing the requested memoranda in both the redacted and unredacted formats for your convenience. Consistent with your request, we are providing an unclassified version of the documents redacted to remove any classified information.

The DOJ wrote Congressional leaders this evening.

page 2

Hannity: Good news for Trump, crushing blows for the left

GOP Congressional Leaders Nunes, Gowdy And Goodlatte Release Statement On Comey Memos

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Ca.), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) issued a statement on the memos later tonight.

The House chairmen note that the memos prove that fired Director Comey never felt obstructed or threatened from his relationship with the president.

And… former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel.

The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence published the statement tonight:

Today House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Ca.), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) issued the following statement:

“We have long argued former Director Comey’s self-styled memos should be in the public domain, subject to any classification redactions. These memos are significant for both what is in them and what is not.

Former Director Comey’s memos show the President made clear he wanted allegations of collusion, coordination, and conspiracy between his campaign and Russia fully investigated. The memos also made clear the ‘cloud’ President Trump wanted lifted was not the Russian interference in the 2016 election cloud, rather it was the salacious, unsubstantiated allegations related to personal conduct leveled in the dossier.

The memos also show former Director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened. While former Director Comey went to great lengths to set dining room scenes, discuss height requirements, describe the multiple times he felt complimented, and myriad other extraneous facts, he never once mentioned the most relevant fact of all, which was whether he felt obstructed in his investigation.

The memos also make certain what has become increasingly clear of late: former Director Comey has at least two different standards in his interactions with others. He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. It is significant former Director Comey made no effort to memorialize conversations with former Attorney General Lynch despite concerns apparently significant enough to warrant his unprecedented appropriation of the charging decision away from her and the Department of Justice in July of 2016.

These memos also lay bare the notion that former Director Comey is not motivated by animus. He was willing to work for someone he deemed morally unsuited for office, capable of lying, requiring of personal loyalty, worthy of impeachment, and sharing the traits of a mob boss. Former Director Comey was willing to overlook all of the aforementioned characteristics in order to keep his job. In his eyes, the real crime was his own firing.

The memos show Comey was blind to biases within the FBI and had terrible judgment with respect to his deputy Andrew McCabe. On multiple occasions he, in his own words, defended the character of McCabe after President Trump questioned McCabe.

Finally, former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel, yet he took no steps to spur the appointment of Special Counsel when he had significant concerns about the objectivity of the Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

As we have consistently said, rather than making a criminal case for obstruction or interference with an ongoing investigation, these memos would be Defense Exhibit A should such a charge be made.”

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service