Clintons Caught Flying Commercial, Reading Book About Child Rape

 Bill and Hillary Clinton were filmed recently on board a commercial flight without any security detail, reading a book about child abuse. This weekend, the former president and former secretary of state boarded a commercial flight at the Delta terminal at Reagan International Airport in Washington, DC.


Clintons caught flying commercial, reading book about child rape

 Bigleaguepolitics.com reports: It is unknown why Bill and Hillary were flying commercial, but the video of the Clintons on a commercial flight quickly went viral on social media and created a lot of buzz as to why the elite political family chose to fly among average Americans and “deplorables” instead of chartering a private plane as they usually do.

Two separate videos of the Clintons were posted by unknown passengers. The first video was filmed near the ticket counter at the Delta terminal at gate 20 in Washington DC.

In the video, Hillary can be seen standing in the corner with two men, avoiding all possible interaction with other passengers, while Bill is standing next to the ticket counter taking a selfie with a young boy.

video: https://twitter.com/WTP_REPORT/status/1016037421643755520?ref_src=t...\

In the second video, which appears to be filmed by a different passenger, Bill and Hillary Clinton can be seen sitting in their seats on a commercial flight without any security detail.

Hillary is wearing sunglasses on the plane avoiding eye contact with passengers, while Bill can be seen ready a copy of “Crimson Lake”, a book about the sexual assault and abduction of an underage girl.

https://twitter.com/JohnCooper0610/status/1016048569395105793?ref_s...

Bill’s choice of literature quickly caught the attention of people on social media who quickly drew a connection between the plot of the book and Bill Clinton’s association with registered sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, who often travels with the Clinton’s on his private plane.

 Besides being tied to a registered child sex predator and other accused sexual predators such as Anthony Weiner, Kevin Spacey, and Harvey Weinstein, Bill Clinton himself has always been surrounded in controversy regarding the numerous women who have accused the former US president of sexual assault and rape, which spurred the creation of the “Bill Clinton Is A Rapist” movement during the 2016 presidential campaign.

People took the Internet to speculate as to why Bill and Hillary, who are multi-millionaires, would choose to fly commercial, and without Secret Service, given that they are both under political scrutiny and constantly surrounded in political controversy.

Given that the Clintons are known to fly on private planes, many social media users asked whether or not the Clintons assets have been frozen, which may be a reason why they publicly downgraded their travel accommodations.

Despite being two of the most despised and recognizable individuals in American politics, it doesn’t appear that the Clintons were publicly confronted or questioned by any of the passengers at the airport, or on the plane.

https://yournewswire.com/clintons-flying-commercial-book-child-rape/

Views: 27

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 To use your statement Hank, FIGURES !!!!!!!!!!!!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

 Judge Orders Mueller To Prove  Russia Meddled In Election 

Judge Dabney L. Friedrich

A Washington federal judge on Thursday ordered special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to clarify election meddling claims lodged against a Russian company operated by Yevgeny Prigozhin, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to Bloomberg.

Concord Management and Consulting, LLC. – one of three businesses indicted by Mueller in February along with 13 individuals for election meddling, surprised the special counsel in April when they actually showed up in court to fight the charges. Mueller’s team tried to delay Concord from entering the case, arguing that thee Russian company not been properly served, however Judge Dabney Friedrich denied the request – effectively telling prosecutors ‘well, they’re here.’

Concord was accused in the indictment of supporting the Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian ‘troll farm’ accused of trying to influence the 2016 US election.

On Thursday, Judge Freidrich asked Mueller’s prosecutors if she should assume they aren’t accusing Concord of violating US laws applicable to election expenditures and failure to register as a foreign agent.

Concord has asked Dabney to throw out the charges – claiming that Mueller’s office fabricated a crime, and that there is no law against interfering in elections.

According to the judge’s request for clarification, the Justice Department has argued that it doesn’t have to show that Concord had a legal duty to report its expenditures to the Federal Election Commission. Rather, the allegation is that the company knowingly engaged in deceptive acts that precluded the FEC, or the Justice Department, from ascertaining whether they had broken the law. -Bloomberg

On Monday, Friedrich raised questions over whether the special counsel’s office could prove a key element of their case – saying that it was “hard to see” how allegations of Russian influence were intended to interfere with US government operations vs. simply “confusing voters,” reports law.com.

During a 90-minute hearing, Friedrich questioned prosecutor Jonathan Kravis about how the government would be able to show the Russian defendants were aware of the Justice Department and FEC’s functions and then deliberately sought to skirt them.

“You still have to show knowledge of the agencies and what they do. How do you do that?” Friedrich asked.

Kravis, a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, argued that the government needed only to show that Concord Management and the other defendants were generally aware that the U.S. government “regulates and monitors” foreign participation in American politics. That awareness, Kravis said, could be inferred from the Russians’ alleged creation of fake social media accounts that appeared to be run by U.S. citizens and “computer infrastructure” intended to mask the Russian origin of the influence operation.

“That is deception that is directed at a higher level,” Kravis said. Kravis appeared in court with Michael Dreeben, a top Justice Department appellate lawyer on detail to the special counsel’s office. -law.com

Concord pleaded not guilty in May. Their attorney, Eric Dubelier – a partner at Reed Smith, has described the election meddling charges as “make believe,” arguing on Monday that Mueller’s indictment against Concord “doesn’t charge a crime.”

“There is no statute of interfering with an election. There just isn’t,” said Dubelier, who added that Mueller’s office alleged a “made-up crime to fit the facts they have.”

Dubelier added that the case against Concord Management is the first in US history “where anyone has ever been charged with defrauding the Justice Department” through their failure to register under FARA.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service