Children Found Alive In ‘Nailed Boxes’ Were Part Of Trafficking Ring


Police say kids found buried alive in nailed boxes were part of child sex trafficking operation

St. Francois County Sheriff Daniel Bullock said that the children were likely locked inside the boxes “for weeks.”

Foxnews.com reports: He said the kids, whose ages range from 6-12, had no access to water, restrooms or windows, and the home reeked of urine.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/07/four-missouri-children-locked-...

“I’ve seen some pretty nasty things, but nothing this deplorable,” the sheriff added.

 He said the four children, three girls and a boy, had been adopted by Cheatham and her estranged husband, but she was living with another man — Head — in the home. Two of the four children are related to each other but none are related to the adults, the sheriff added.

 The charges could put the suspects behind bars for decades, prosecuting attorney Jerrod Mahurin said.

 Law enforcement responded earlier Tuesday after someone called Missouri’s Child Abuse Hotline to report the home in Farmington, Fox 2 reported.

https://fox2now.com/2018/08/07/children-locked-in-small-windowless-...

 When investigators tried to enter the home, Head reportedly would not let them in at first. Ultimately they said they saw Cheatham unscrewing the plywood holding the boxes shut.

The four children have been placed in the care of Missouri’s Children’s Division.

Farmington is about an hour’s drive south of St. Louis.

https://yournewswire.com/kids-nailed-boxes-trafficking-ring/

 


Views: 23

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

MAYBE THEY NEED TO BE NAILED SHUT IN ONE THEMSELVES SEEMS ONLY RIGHT THEN KILLED OR LEFT THERE WHO KNOWS.  

OMG THAT IS JUST BEYOND ANY WORDS

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service