CDC Doctor, Who Claimed Flu Shot Caused Outbreak, Missing Feared Dead

 The CDC Doctor who controversially warned this year’s “disastrous” flu shot may be responsible for the deadly flu epidemic sweeping the country, has been reported missing and is feared dead.


The CDC doctor who controversially warned this year’s “disastrous” flu shot may be responsible for the deadly flu epidemic sweeping the country, has been reported missing and is feared dead.

Ryan Kruger from 11Alive spoke to Dr. Cunningham’s family Saturday as they posted signs around his neighborhood.

All of this is an effort to find him and bring him back home,” Dr. Cunningham’s father told 11Alive. Family members confirmed there is no chance the CDC doctor would choose to disappear from his life without telling his family and friends.

He’s a scientist, so he has a very methodical mindset and an outgoing personality,” a family member said.

Dr. Cunningham was last seen by colleagues Monday the at the CDC office in Chamblee, Georgia. Colleagues said he was feeling sick, so he left work early and said he was going to finish his work from home. That was the last time anyone saw him and he hasn’t been heard from since that day.

In January, Dr. Cunningham shared his opinion that this year’s flu shot was behind the deadly outbreak of the flu, while warning that if his name was attached to the widely-circulated quotes, he would lose his job – or suffer an even worse fate.

Understanding the dangers involved in speaking out about vaccines in the current climate, we granted him anonymity in the article. However Dr. Cunningham told us we should go public should anything happen to him.

Dr. Cunningham was an expert on contagious epidemics, having been deployed by the CDC to work on the Ebola and Zika crises in previous years. He knows a suspicious outbreak when he sees one, and this year’s flu epidemic raised serious red flag’s for the CDC doctor.

Some of the patients I’ve administered the flu shot to this year have died,” the doctor said in January, adding “I don’t care who you are, this scares the crap out of me.

We have seen people dying across the country of the flu, and one thing nearly all of them have in common is they got the flu shot,” he said.

Dr. Cunningham’s experience of people dying of the flu after receiving the flu shot are sadly not uncommon, however he remains one of a select few doctors who have spoken out and raised the issue in the public domain.

Another doctor who spoke out about the flu shot, Dr. Daniel Neides, the Chief Operating Officer of the Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute, was fired after sharing his personal experiences with the flu shot and writing an article questioning the legitimacy of the CDC’s advice on vaccines.

Big Pharma’s dollars have effectively purchased the silence of the CDC, and turned mainstream media into a branch of their PR department. You can no longer believe anything they say about pharmaceuticals, especially vaccines.

For their part, the CDC does not allow medical practitioners to speak out regarding their experience with vaccines. If they do not toe the company line, they lose their job, or suffer a worse fate, as the ongoing purge of holistic doctors proves.

Has Dr. Cunningham suffered a similar fate as the scores of dead holistic doctors for daring to speak his mind and warn citizens about possible effects of the flu shot?


Views: 154725

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Oxford University: Vaccines Cause Autoinflammatory Disorders

Doctors should not take a one-size-fits-all approach to vaccination schedules, and should be very cautious when administering vaccines to patients with different health concerns and medical histories, according to a new academic study published by the Oxford University journal Rheumatology.


Doctors should not take a one-size-fits-all approach to vaccination schedules, and should be very cautious when administering vaccines to patients, according to a new study.

The study lends weight to calls from vaccine skeptics for further studies into vaccine safety involving cost/benefit analyses on each and every vaccination. Big Pharma must not be allowed to operate outside the usual legal parameters applied to every other industry and they certainly must not be allowed to regulate themselves.

Contemporary Pediatrics reports: Although the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that patients with CAPS—particularly familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome (FCAS), Muckle-Wells syndrome (MWS) and neonatal onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID)—receive vaccinations against pneumococcal disease, tetanus, and influenza when treated with immunosuppressive medications, the study investigated the safety of these vaccines in the particular patient population.

Patients with CAPS may have an increased susceptibility to pneumococcal pneumonia, similar to other patients with immune-related disorders, according to the report.

Previous research revealed unusually severe local and systemic reactions in CAPS patients related to vaccination that led to this study. Researchers first analyzed case studies of 7 CAPS patients vaccinated with the pneumococcal series. Six of those patients were also being following in the B-CONFIDENT (Clinical Outcomes and Safety: A Registry Study of Ilaris [Canakinumab] Patients) registry, a long-term prospective observational study of patients treated with canakinumab.

This involvement led the study authors to expand their study to investigate the safety of pneumococcal and other vaccines within the entire B-CONFIDENT registry

The registry followed 285 patients, 68 of whom fit the CAPS criteria desired by the study authors. Those 68 CAPS patients received a total of 159 vaccine injections across 9 countries—81% influenza, 26% pneumococcal, 18% tetanus and diphtheria, and 16% against other unspecified pathogens.

Over the study period, the researchers noted that 43 CAPS patients received more than 1 vaccination, and that 22 injections in 18 CAPS patients resulted in at least 1 vaccine reaction.

Most of the vaccine reactions were in 12 CAPS patients who received pneumococcal vaccines. In total, 80% of the pneumococcal vaccines given to CAPS patients caused a reaction in comparison with just 7% of tetanus/diphtheria vaccines, according to the report.

The most common vaccine reaction was fever, which occurred in about half of all pneumococcal injections. Additionally, reactions caused by the pneumococcal vaccine occurred very rapidly and symptoms lasted longer than those caused by influenza, tetanus, or diphtheria vaccinations.

Five of the CAPS patients in the study developed severe reactions, 2 of whom required hospitalization related to cellulitis and meningitis. Additionally, researchers found that pneumococcal vaccines in CAPS patients triggered early systemic inflammation and even CAPS flares.

“One hypothesis that could explain the adverse events following pneumococcal vaccination is that pneumococcal antigens contain TLR2 and TLR4 ligands that trigger the rapid onset and systemic symptoms in patients who are genetically prone to inflammasome overactivation,” the study notes.

“The observation that patients with the more severe CAPS phenotype (NOMID) appeared to have more frequent and more severe events than CAPS patients with the less severe phenotype (FCAS) also supports a role of inflammaso-hyperactivation in this adverse reaction.”

Although the patients in the study were treated with canakinumab, the study authors did not observe a relationship between canakinumab dose or timing and vaccination reactions, according to the report.

Hal M. Hoffman, MD, is a professor of Pediatrics and Medicine and chief of the Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology in the Department of Pediatrics at the University of California (UC) San Diego/Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego. One of the study authors, Hoffman’s lab at UC San Diego was the first to identify the genetic basis of 4 human diseases, including the genetic basis for CAPS—NLRP3.

Although many patients with conditions like CAPS might not be managed by general practice pediatricians, Hoffman says they are often the first to see those patients prior to confirmation of a diagnosis.

“CAPS is an ultra-rare autoinflammatory disease characterized by rash, fever, and musculoskeletal symptoms. Prevalence is approximately 1 to 2 per million, but patients often first present to pediatricians. Many are referred to and managed by specialists including immunologists and rheumatologists,” Hoffman says.

Once diagnosed, treatment of CAPS can affect vaccine recommendation for those patients, he adds.

“Many CAPS patients are treated with IL-1 inhibitors [that] may predispose the patients to common bacterial infections, specifically streptococcal infections, and therefore it is recommended to vaccinate or give booster prior to starting medicines,” Hoffman says. “Most vaccines are given by the pediatricians, although Pneumovax is not a common vaccine given by pediatricians.”

Hoffman says the study demonstrates that pediatricians should consider carefully the risk versus benefit of specific vaccines in patients with rare inherited inflammatory disorders such as CAPS.

“Physicians should weigh risks and benefits of vaccines in patients with immune disorders,” Hoffman says. “It is widely known that patients with some forms of immune deficiencies should avoid live viral vaccines. This is another consideration."

CDC Admit Vaccines Contain ‘Aborted Human Fetus Cells’

According to a bombshell document published by the CDC, vaccines currently in use in the United States contain ingredients including "human fetus cells lines" and "Monkey kidney pus cells."

Vaccines currently in use in the United States contain ingredients including “human fetus cells lines” and “African Green Monkey kidney pus cells” harvested from diseased primates, according to a bombshell document published by the CDC.

In a PDF on the CDC website titled “Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary,” the CDC lists all the excipients (often referred to as bulking agents or fillers) being used in vaccines that are currently being injected into adults and children across the country.

The list, current as of January 6, 2017, was “extracted from manufacturers’ package inserts,” according to the CDC.

To read the full, disturbing list of vaccines ingredients Big Pharma is pumping into bodies, including “chick embryo cell culture” and “formaldehyde”, click through to the CDC website here.

Natural News reports: The WI-38 cell line is widely known to be “derived from lung tissue of an aborted white (caucasian) female fetus,” as even the pro-vaccine Wikipedia website admits. As the Coriell Institute for Medical Research explains about the MRC-5 cell line / WI-38:

The MRC-5 cell line was developed in September 1966 from lung tissue taken from a 14 week fetus aborted for psychiatric reason from a 27 year old physically healthy woman. The cell morphology is fibroblast-like. The karyotype is 46,XY; normal diploid male. Cumulative population doublings to senescence is 42-48. G6PD isoenzyme is type B.

The human fetal tissue cells have become such an issue of outrage that even the Vatican has issued a statement concerning their use, in which they address, “vaccines containing live viruses which have been prepared from human cell lines of fetal origin, using tissues from aborted human fetuses as a source of such cells.”

You can find the Vatican’s response at this link, in which they discuss the moral and ethical issues of “The principle of licit cooperation in evil.

Below, you’ll find the complete list published by the CDC, de-duplicated and sorted alphabetically. Notice that these ingredients include toxic metals (aluminum salts), bizarre animal cells from humans, monkeys, cows, pigs and chickens, ingredients derived from GMOs, the radioactive element barium, artificial coloring chemicals, excitotoxins such as glutamate, chemical cleansing agents (Triton X-100), dangerous bacterial strains (E.coli), toxic chemicals such as glutaraldehyde, thimerosal (mercury) and much more.

No one can refute any of this because it’s admitted by the CDC itself.

Here’s what happens to some children when they’re injected with vaccines containing these toxins:

vaccination-children

The complete list of vaccines excipients published by the CDC can be found HERE.

Yale University Finds Link Between Vaccines And Neurological Disorders

Yale University study confirms link between vaccines and autism

A team of scientists from Yale University have found disturbing evidence of a link between Vaccines and various Neurological Disorders

The team of researchers from the Yale School of Medicine and Penn State College of Medicine say that children aged between 6-15 who receive vaccinations are at greater risk of being diagnosed with certain neuropsychiatric disorders than their non-vaccinated counterparts.

 

Ecowatch.com reports:

This new study, which raises important questions about whether over-vaccination may be triggering immune and neurological damage in a subset of vulnerable children (something parents of children with autism have been saying for years), was published in the peer-reviewed journal Frontiers in Psychiatry, Jan. 19.

More than 95,000 children in the database that were analyzed had one of seven neuropsychiatric disorders: anorexia nervosa, anxiety disorder, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), bipolar disorder, major depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and tic disorder.

Children with these disorders were compared to children without neuropsychiatric disorders, as well as to children with two other conditions that could not possibly be related to vaccination: open wounds and broken bones.

This was a well-designed, tightly controlled study. Control subjects without brain disorders were matched with the subjects by age, geographic location and gender.

More than 95,000 children in the database that were analyzed had one of seven neuropsychiatric disorders: anorexia nervosa, anxiety disorder, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), bipolar disorder, major depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and tic disorder.

Children with these disorders were compared to children without neuropsychiatric disorders, as well as to children with two other conditions that could not possibly be related to vaccination: open wounds and broken bones.

This was a well-designed, tightly controlled study. Control subjects without brain disorders were matched with the subjects by age, geographic location and gender.and infants in America despite questions about efficacy and the scientifically documented risks.

Why look for a correlation between vaccination administration and brain disorders?

As the researchers point out, two major studies, one from researchers in Norway and one from an international team of researchers from Finland, Italy and Denmark, have shown an increased risk of narcolepsy following administration of the H1N1 flu vaccine.

Another study from China found an increased risk of narcolepsy after the H1N1 flu itself, which was unlikely to be linked to vaccinations.

If we look at this data from the H1N1 flu outbreaks, we see that immune responses—whether to the disease itself or to vaccination against the disease—can damage the brain.

While new discoveries about the human immune system are being made all the time, it is well understood that the immune system plays a role in brain development and in certain psychiatric conditions, including attention disorders, eating disorders, obsessive disorders and depression.

It is also well understood that the body’s immune response involves inflammation, which is when tissue swells in response to harmful stimulation. Harmful stimulation includes infectious diseases (that is, illnesses themselves), environmental toxins like mercury, and allergens like pollen or dust mites (which are actually benign, though an over-stimulated immune system perceives them as threats).

We further know that vaccination can cause inflammation, which is part of the body’s natural response to foreign substances.

Previous scientific studies have shown that when an immune reaction causes inflammation, it can negatively affect the brain.

So it is scientifically plausible and more than reasonable to investigate whether vaccination itself, which provokes inflammation, may also negatively affect the brain.

I agree with these researchers that the correlation between anorexia, OCD, tic disorder, anxiety disorder and vaccinations warrants further scrutiny. This study suggests that the seemingly inexplicable increase we have seen in brain disorders among young children may not be so mysterious after all.

https://www.ecowatch.com/should-i-get-the-flu-shot-2132041142.html

In two week we have a convention, finish this up, transfer info, Hank and Tif, join us, take a couple weeks off for some fun in the sun.

Monsanto’s Herbicide Glyphosate Found In Vaccines

Monsanto’s Herbicide Glyphosate Found In Vaccines

We keep hearing that vaccines are safe, but is it safe to inject a ‘probably carcinogenic’ herbicide?

Anthony Samsel, an independent researcher in New Hampshire and one of the worlds leading researchers on GMOs, collected a large number of popular vaccinations and had them analyzed by multiple labs in the United States for the presence of Glyphosate.

He found, as suspected, that the vaccines were largely contaminated by Monsanto’s herbicide.

WHO-says-Round-up-probably-causes-cancer

Dr. Brownstein reports:

Researcher Anthony Samsel has published five peer-reviewed articles on the herbicide Glyphosate (the active ingredient in Roundup®). A yet-to-be published sixth paper found various commonly-used vaccines contaminated with the herbicide glyphosate.

Yes, you read that correctly: Our vaccines are contaminated with an herbicide that the World Health Organization characterized as “probably carcinogenic to humans.”

How can this happen? That answer is easy.

Many vaccines contain animal byproducts such as gelatin, bovine casein, bovine serum, bovine calf serum, or chicken egg protein. The animals from which these products come from are fed grains sprayed with glyphosate. It does not take a rocket scientist to come to the conclusion that these animals, fed glyphosate in their diet, would contain glyphosate in their byproducts.

Samsel sent a letter to Congress that stated:

“I have run numerous groups of vaccines and identified several vectors of contamination. These include the excipient gelatins, egg protein and or similar substrates used to grow vaccines. I have found gelatins and egg proteins contaminated with Glyphosate-based herbicides from animals fed a glyphosate contaminated diet. This contamination carries into thousands of consumer products i.e. vitamins, protein powders, wine, beer and other consumables which use gelatins as part of the product or in fining and processing.”

What did Samsel hear back?

He heard nothing.

In other words, our do-nothing Congress, so far, has failed to respond. In his letter to Congress, Samsel also stated that Glyphosate is a synthetic amino acid. It bioaccumulates and is found in all tissue types, particularly the bone and marrow of animals fed a diet contaminated with Glyphosate residues.

You can see Dr. Samsel talk about his research by clicking here.

The following vaccines were found to be contaminated with the herbicide glyphosate:

1. MMR
2. Varicella (chicken pox)
3. Zostavax (shingles)
4. Proquad (MMR, rubella, varicella)
5. Fluzone Quad (flu vaccine)
6. Hepatitis B (B Energix-B)

Multiple vaccines from different manufactures were found to be contaminated. Folks, this is a big deal. Injecting a vaccine contaminated with a known herbicide that is “probably carcinogenic to humans” should be prohibited. We need a Congressional investigation into our vaccines.

In the video below, Tony Mitra interviews Anthony Samsel, to discuss the newly emerging scientific findings on Glyphosate and how it can and does hurt creatures including humans.

Government Study Finds Babies Who Receive Vaccines 10x More Likely To Die

 


Babies who receive DTP vaccine are 10x more likely to suffer premature deaths

A study funded by the Danish government has found that infants who receive the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) vaccine are ten times more likely to die than their unvaccinated peers. 

According to a team of Scandinavian scientists, lead by Dr. Soren Wengel Mogensen, African children who were inoculated with the DTP vaccine in the early 80’s had a 5-10 times greater mortality rate than anyone else.

The study, published in January in EBioMedicine, suggests that vaccines overall weaken the immune systems of children.

Worldmercuryproject.org reports:

The scientists term the study a “natural experiment” since a birthday-based vaccination system employed for the Bandim Health Project (BHP) in Guinea Bissau, West Africa had the effect of creating a vaccinated cohort and a similarly situated unvaccinated control group.  In the time period covered by this study, Guinea-Bissau had 50% child mortality rates for children up to age 5.  Starting in 1978, BHP health care workers contacted pregnant mothers and encouraged them to visit infant weighing sessions provided by a BHP team every three months after their child’s birth.  Beginning in 1981, BHP offered vaccinations at the weighing sessions.  Since the DPT vaccine and OPV (oral polio) immunizations were offered only to children who were at least three months of age at the weighing sessions, the children’s random birthdays allowed for analysis of deaths between 3 and 5 months of age depending on vaccination status.  So, for example, a child born on January 1st and weighed on April 1st would be vaccinated, but a child born on February 1stwould not be vaccinated until their following visit at age 5 months on July 1st.

In the primary analysis, DTP-vaccinated infants experienced mortalities five times greater than DTP-unvaccinated infants.  Mortalities to vaccinated girls were 9.98 times those among females in the unvaccinated control group, while mortalities to vaccinated boys were 3.93 times the controls.  Oddly, the scientists found that children receiving the oral polio vaccine simultaneously with DTP fared much better than children who did not.  The OPV vaccine appeared to modify the negative effect of the DTP vaccine, reducing mortalities to 3.52 times those experienced among the control group.  Overall, mortalities among vaccinated children were 10 times the control group when children received only the DTP.

Mogensen and his colleagues hypothesize that the DTP vaccine might weaken a child’s immune system against non-target infections.  They conclude, “Though protective against the target disease, DTP may increase susceptibility to unrelated infections… DTP was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated.  No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP.”

The Mogensen study supports the conclusions of previous investigations into child survival following vaccination. An earlier study by Dr. Peter Aaby, of the introduction of DTP in rural Guinea-Bissau, indicated a 2-fold higher mortality among vaccinated children (Aaby et al. 2004a). The Aaby report is one of several early studies that documented vaccination status and followed children prospectively. All of them indicated that DTP-vaccinated children died at rates far exceeding mortality amongst the control group. A meta-analysis of all eight known studies found a two-fold higher mortality for DTP-vaccinated compared to DTP-unvaccinated (Aaby et al. 2016) (Appendix A).

In 2014, The World Health Organization (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) conducted its own literature review of the potential non-specific effects (NSEs) of several vaccines, including DTP, and found that the majority of studies reported a detrimental effect of DTP (Higgins et al., 2014; Strategic Advisory Group of Experts of Immunization, 2014) due to its penchant for increasing susceptibility to unrelated infections. SAGE recommended further research.

Moreover, Mogensen and his colleagues observe that the studies reviewed by SAGE probably underestimated the lethal effect of the DTP vaccine because of unusually high mortality in the control groups, ”Unvaccinated children in these studies have usually been frail children too sick or malnourished to get vaccinated and the studies may therefore have underestimated the negative effect of DTP”. The Mogensen study sought to avoid this pitfall by using controls selected by birthday and by eliminating underweight children and orphans from both the study group and the control group. It included only children who were breastfed. All the infants were healthy at the time of vaccination. Nevertheless, the Mogensen authors point out that, even in their study, the unvaccinated children had slightly worse nutritional status and travelled more – biases that would tend to increase mortality. They conclude that, “The estimate from the natural experiment may therefore still be conservative.”

The significance of the Mogensen study findings is underscored by the observation that, “Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP3 is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs.”

The authors close with a bracing rebuke to public health regulators, “It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.” Those words should serve as a cold water wake-up call to the World Health Organization (WHO), the CDC and other public health officials. The public in both poor and rich countries has a right to scientifically-based evidence that international vaccine programs are as safe as possible and that they have been thoroughly safety-tested. The best metrics for measuring safety are studies comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated cohorts. Yet, both the CDC and the WHO have aggressively discouraged the pursuit of such studies.

Finally, it’s important to note that the DTP vaccine used in Guinea-Bissau in the early 1980s almost certainly contained high concentrations of both mercury and aluminum. Vaccine makers first created the combined diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine in the 1940s, mixing in an aluminum adjuvant and a mercury preservative (thimerosal) from its inception. At that time, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended DTP for mass use in children. Prior to 1990, DTP was the only thimerosal-containing vaccine recommended for infants.

Five manufacturers supplied UNICEF with the DTP vaccines used in West Africa in the late 1970s and early 1980s. One of these, Biken of Japan, described the industry standard in its 1987 lab report: “Outline of Method of Manufacture—The preparation [of DTP] also contains thimerosal as a preservative.”

By the early 1980s, a cascade of lawsuits filed across the United States on behalf of vaccine-injured children were driving DTP manufacturers from the market and threatening to shut down production of the DTP shot and other vaccines. That threat led the U.S. Congress to bestow legal immunity on vaccine makers via the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Program in 1986, followed in December, 1987, by the rollout of “Vaccine Court.” Following the recommendation by the Institute of Medicine, vaccine makers removed thimerosal from the American DTaP between 2001-2003. However, multi-dose DTP vaccines given to tens of millions of children across the African continent continue to contain massive doses of thimerosal (25mcg of ethylmercury per injection) that exceed the EPA’s maximum exposure levels by many times. Neither the CDC nor the WHO has ever published a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study that would be necessary to determine the overall health impacts of this potent toxin on African children. The Mogensen report is a loud call for such a study.

Scientists Say Contracting Ebola Means Lifelong Disease

New research shows that Ebola is for life

New research conducted in Liberia by U.S. neurologists has found that anyone who contracts Ebola will likely face a lifetime of disease and serious long-term neurological problems if they survive. 

The study says that survivors will continue to suffer the affects of Ebola, even after they have been declared “Ebola-free” – meaning that contracting Ebola is for life.

Naturalnews.com reports:

The preliminary results of the study were made public within days of the news that Pauline Cafferkey, a nurse who contracted the disease while volunteering in Sierra Leone, had been admitted to the hospital for a third time since “recovering” from the virus.

From The Guardian:

“Cafferkey, 40, who returned from working in the Kerry Town Ebola treatment unit in Sierra Leone, run by Save the Children, in December 2014, spent almost a month in isolation in the Royal Free in January 2015.

“When she was discharged and returned to her home in Scotland, it was assumed that her problems were over, but last October she again fell ill. She was diagnosed with meningitis, triggered by the Ebola virus lingering in her nervous system. Again she was transferred to the Royal Free, where she came close to death but rallied and returned home.”

This time, Cafferkey has been hospitalized “due to a late complication from her previous infection by the Ebola virus,” but is now considered to be in stable condition.

Survivors of the virus have reported a number of ongoing symptoms, the most common of which include fatigue, memory loss, headaches, depression and muscle pain.

When survivors were examined, many were found to display “abnormal eye movements, tremors and abnormal reflexes.”

Another survivor’s story

Another case of a Western survivor who has experienced long-term health issues after surviving Ebola involves an American infectious disease specialist named Ian Crozier, who contracted the virus in 2014 while working as a volunteer for the World Health Organization (WHO) in Sierra Leone.

Crozier nearly died during treatment at Emory University Hospital in Atlanta – after becoming unconscious he was placed on a respirator and given dialysis. He survived the ordeal, but after being released from the hospital he continued to suffer from the after-effects of the disease; he had to learn how to walk again and was severely exhausted all the time, but felt lucky to have survived.

Nine weeks later, he began noticing vision problems. Ebola survivors commonly suffer from inflammation of the eye, and an initial examination seemed to indicate that, aside from some internal scarring of the eye, he was okay.

A month after that, he began to experience a burning pain in the eye, and despite corticosteroid treatment, his vision continued to deteriorate. Then one day, he looked in a mirror and noticed that his left eye had turned from blue to a strange green color.

When doctors extracted fluid from the eye, they found it contained live Ebola virus. While taking the necessary steps to prevent the disease from infecting others, the doctors increased the steroid dosage and gave Crozier an experimental antiviral drug.

As reported by Wired:

“Mercifully, it worked. Over the following weeks, Crozier’s symptoms gradually cleared. His eye turned blue again and his vision slowly returned. As it did, Crozier began to have questions. ‘While my eye was going blind, I was fascinated by the science going on,’ Crozier says. Now he was thinking of his former patients in Sierra Leone. From fairly early on in the outbreak, anecdotal reports had emerged of survivors struggling with ‘post-Ebola syndrome’ – symptoms ranging from vision loss to hearing loss, joint pains, headaches and memory loss. There were even some rare reports of survivors dying suddenly. Could it be that they too still had the virus inside them? Or was it something else entirely?”

Crozier and Cafferkey’s cases, along with the results of the new research, have shown that little is truly understood about the long-term effects of the Ebola virus, but it’s clear that they indeed exist, and certainly warrant further study.

Patent Reveals Plan To Hide Vaccines In Food Particles

Patents reveals vaccines to be hidden in food particles

A disturbing patent discovered this week reveals plans to hide vaccines within food particles without the public knowing about it. 

US Patent application ‘US20080044481 A1’ (“Microparticles for oral delivery”) was filed in 2005, and allows drugs and vaccines to be embedded into tiny invisible particles of food.

Activistpost.com reports:

Are we to assume the technology hasn’t yet been applied? Is it operating at a stealth level? I’ll try to answer these questions in a minute. But first:

The inventor and assignee is listed as Mordechai Harel, who was associated with Advanced BioNutrition Corporation of Columbia, Maryland. Here are a group of quotes from the patent application. The statements leave no doubt about the wide, wide application of the technology.

“The particles described herein can be used to deliver bioactive agents (e.g., nutrients, drugs, vaccines, antibodies, and the like), bacteria (e.g., probiotic bacteria), smaller particles, or substantially any other material to the animal.”

“The particles described herein can be prepared and used as free-flowing dry powders, slurries, suspensions, and the like, and are useful for delivering to an animal a drug, a pesticide, a nutrient, a vaccine, a smaller particle, or substantially any other composition that can be contained in the particles. The particles are thus suitable for use in human food products, animal feeds (e.g., pet foods and farmed animal diets), therapeutic compositions (e.g., drugs), prophylactic compositions (e.g., vaccines, antibiotics, and probiotic bacterial preparations), and pest control products among other products.”

“A ‘particle’ is a discrete piece of a (homogeneous or heterogeneous) material having a maximum dimension not greater than 5000 micrometers.”

“Furthermore, when the microparticles are to be used as components of a food product, it can be desirable that the microparticles are not visible.”

“The particles described herein can be used to deliver substantially any chemical species, combination of chemicals, cell, or other piece of matter that can be incorporated into the particle to a component of an animal. All such items are referred to herein as ‘bioactive’ compositions, regardless of what the utility of the composition is. Bioactive compositions include, for example, pharmaceutical compositions or compounds, nutraceutical compositions or compounds, nutritional components, probiotic bacteria, bacteriophages, viruses, flavorants, fragrances, detergents or other surface-active compositions.”

“Examples of these [deliverable micro] agents include antibiotics, analgesics, vaccines, anti-inflammatory agents, antidepressants, anti-viral agents, anti-tumor agents, enzyme inhibitors, formulations containing zidovudine, proteins or peptides (such as vaccines, antibodies, antimicrobial peptides), enzymes, (e.g., amylases, proteases, lipases, pectinases, cellulases, hemicellulases, pentosanases, xylanases, and phytases), liposomes, aromatic nitro and nitroso compounds and their metabolites, HIV protease inhibitors, viruses, and steroids, hormones or other growth stimulating agents, pesticides, herbicides, germicides, biocides, algicides, rodenticides, fungicides, insecticides, antioxidants, plant and animal growth promoters, plant and animal growth inhibitors, preservatives, nutraceuticals, disinfectants, sterilization agents, catalysts, chemical reactants, fermentation agents, foods, animal feeds, food or animal feed supplements, nutrients, flavors, colors, dyes, cosmetics, drugs, vitamins, sex sterilants, fertility inhibitors, fertility promoters, air purifiers, microorganism attenuators, nucleic acids (e.g., RNA, DNA, PNA, vectors, plasmids, ribozymes, aptamers, dendrimers, and the like), antioxidants, phytochemicals, hormones, vitamins (such as vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, B12; C, D, E, and K, pantothenate, and folic acid), pro-vitamins, carotenoids, minerals (such as calcium, selenium, magnesium salts, available iron, and iron salts), microorganisms (such as bacteria, such as probiotics, lactobacilli, fungi, and yeast), prebiotics, trace elements, essential and/or highly unsaturated fatty acids (such as omega-3 fatty acids, and mid-chain triglycerides), nutritional supplements, enzymes (such as amylases, proteases, lipases, pectinases, cellulases, hemicellulases, pentosanases, xylanases, and phytases), pigments, amino acids, agriculturally useful compositions to either prevent infestation (such as herbicides, pesticides, insecticides, rodenticides, fungicides, mixtures thereof) or to promote growth (such as hormones, fertilizers, or other growth stimulating agents), flavorants, and fragrances.”

I’d say that’s a wide range of application, wouldn’t you?

Did you notice, among the blizzard of compounds deliverable through invisible microparticles, the drug called zidovudine? That’s AZT, a chemo medicine used to treat AIDS patients. To say AZT is toxic would be a vast understatement. It destroys the ability of cells to replicate. And back in 2005, it was mentioned as a drug that can be delivered in food.

So is this technology being applied? Do we, in fact, have these microparticles and their bioactive components in our food?

Let’s go back to the 2005 patent application. As I mentioned, the inventor, Mordechai Harel, was associated with a company, Advanced BioNutrition Corporation. On the company’s website, we find a link to a scientific paper co-authored by Roger Drewes, who became the company’s chief science officer in 2010 (“A novel targeted delivery technology for protecting sensitive bioac...”). This is an interesting paper. Here is some of the language in the paper. Does any of it remind you of quotes from the 2005 patent application? The paper mentions a novel and proprietary “delivery technology,” MicroMax, which “protect[s] sensitive bioactive compounds through food manufacturing processes.” Also mentioned: a “formulation containing natural polymers surrounding the probiotic bacteria or other biologically active materials…” The probiotic bacteria “remain quiescent while retaining their activity for a long period of time under challenging…gastric conditions…[MicroMax was tested using] bacteria, essential oils, vitamins, enzymes, pigments, and even vaccines in a variety of food and feed products…and the microparticles were sieved to deliver the desired particle range…”

This might help. Here is the abstract from the 2005 patent application: “The invention provides microbeads containing oil-associated biologically active compounds and methods for their manufacture and use. The microbeads consist of a soluble complex of non-digestible polymer and emulsifier with oil-associated biologically active compounds embedded in a matrix of digestible polymer. The disclosed microbead complex protects the biologically active compounds, such as vitamins, fish oil and carotenoids, from oxidation, taste and odor degradation. The disclosed microbeads also provide protection from the stomach digestive distraction [e.g., gastric activity] and allows for the delivery of the biologically active compounds in the intestine.”

I think we’re looking at the same technology in the 2005 patent application and in Advanced BioNutrition Corp’s MicroMax methods—or two technologies that closely resemble each other—in which case, yes, invisible microparticles in food are much more than a proposed system. This is a working system, available now. It can deliver a stunning array of chemicals and bioactive substances to people in their food. (Note: I have no idea what Advanced BioNutrition Corp is or isn’t delivering to its customers—but I think the company should make these facts known.)

Who knows what other companies have, and are using, this technology?

Are we looking at zero informed consent to be treated, in food, with medicines and vaccines? Zero knowledge on the part of the public? Zero accountability? Nothing on the food labels?

Sick minds never stop and cast blame on others for what they think up and do. Incredible. Remove these hook-nosed, genetically diseased parasites from our country,

Thanks for reporting on this. Nothing is safe it seems 

Your welcome Mark,

 And we are working on a few other issues in this.

Detective: Doctor Who Linked Vaccines To Autism Was Murdered

Police confirm that doctor who linked vaccines to autism was murdered

 The death of a renowned doctor who proved that vaccines cause autism has been confirmed as a murder this week. 

Dr. Jeffrey Bradstreet was an outspoken proponent of the theory that vaccinations cause autism. Shortly before his death, he was working on a controversial molecule that occurs naturally in the body that would have been capable of reversing autism.

Dr Bradstreet was found dead with a single gunshot wound to the chest, floating in a North Carolina river last year. Due to the controversial nature of his work, his family believed that the government or Big Pharma had a hand in his death.

Naturalnews.com reports:

Due to the controversial nature of Bradstreet’s research, as well as the fact that his office was raided by officials with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the days leading up his death, the physician’s family hired a private investigator in hopes of finding the truth about Bradstreet’s untimely demise.

‘It is our 100 percent belief that Jeff did not commit suicide’

Finally, new details regarding Bradstreet’s death have been revealed through a recent interview conducted by the producer of the documentary VAXXED. Polly Tommey sat down with Bradstreet’s baby brother Thom and his lovely wife Candice at the AutismOne conference held towards the end of last month at the Loews Chicago O’Hare Hotel in Rosemont, Illinois.

Thom said that while the family knew in their hearts that Bradstreet was murdered, it wasn’t until they had the opportunity to review the case forensically that they realized the evidence supports their theory that his death was in no possible way a suicide, as has been reported by police and the mainstream media.

“People who knew him knew he would never take his own life,” said Thom, adding that information uncovered by a forensic scientist hired by the family validates that conjecture. After meeting with the medical examiner and reviewing case files and photographs, the private forensic scientist ruled that Bradstreet’s death was absolutely not a suicide.

“It is our 100 percent belief that Jeff did not commit suicide. Not only because of who Jeff was as a person, but because we looked at the science of it; we looked at the medical proof and it’s just not possible that Jeff took his own life,” commented Thom.

“Unfortunately, there’s an ongoing investigation so there’s not a lot we can share about the specifics. But the way the bullet entered into the body, it’s almost impossible for an individual to do that and it was far enough away that it left no tattooing, no significant burn marks or anything like that.”

‘Where would the world of autism be without Jeff Bradstreet?’

Bradstreet’s younger brother noted that while it would be easy to say the murder was a conspiracy due to his controversial (and highly effective) work, they can’t yet say for sure, adding that they must know for sure before reaching any conclusions regarding the perpetrator(s)’ identity.

The family said that while they are still overcome with immense sadness, they know that Bradstreet is in heaven because he was a “great man of faith” who loved God.

“The sadness is to know that there’s all these parents out here, existing patients of Jeff or recently diagnosed, where do they go? Where would the world of autism be without Jeff Bradstreet? [Without] his 20 years of knowledge and input and experience, where would we be?” asked Thom.

The Bradstreets asked the public for patience while they attempt to uncover who may have been behind their loved one’s death.

“Have patience. Be in prayer. Stay actively involved in the world of autism,” said Thom, adding that supporting projects like VAXXED is a great way to continue Bradstreet’s legacy.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

ALERT ALERT

 Dem Governor Threatens Trump: “Something’s Got To Happen To This Guy… He’s Sabotaging The World Order”

“If we don’t get rid of him, he’s going to undermine America and even the world.”

Another Democrat has called for ‘something to happen’ to President Trump in order to save the democratic process in America.

California Gov. Jerry Brown made the comments during an appearance on MSNBC, while discussing the death toll during hurricanes last year in Puerto Rico.

“Well, the problem is, we never had a president who was engaged in this kind of behavior,” Brown declared.

“I mean he’s not telling the truth. He keeps changing his mind. He’s sabotaging the world order in many respects.” the Governor claimed.

“So it’s unprecedented, it’s dangerous, and hopefully this election is going to send a strong message to the country,” he continued.

“The Democrats will win and then Trump — well, something’s got to happen to this guy, because if we don’t get rid of him, he’s going to undermine America and even the world.” Brown urged.

The tacit threat comes in the wake of Maxine Waters encouraging anti-Trumpers to “knock off” the President.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service