Broward County Sheriff Who Exposed Parkland Shooting Found Dead – Media Blackout


Broward County Sheriff who exposed Parkland found dead

 A Broward County Sheriff Deputy who dared to question the official narrative around the Parkland shooting has been found dead under suspicious circumstances.  On April 1, Jason Fitzsimon was found dead on his sofa. According to police, the 42-year-old had been in excellent health prior to his untimely death.

Memoryholeblog.org reports: reports: Deputy Fitzsimons wasn’t just any law enforcement officer. Unlike many of his peers, he took to social media to question the potential agenda behind the February 14 Marjory Stoneman High School mass shooting, suggesting that the event was being used to promote the Democratic Party’s gun control platform in anticipation of the 2018 midterm elections. And recent personnel decisions involving public officials indicate (e.g. here and here), an unwritten law of taxpayer-funded institutions is that employees disavow and steer clear of “conspiracy theories” that may call their superiors motives into question.

 One post found on Fitzsimon’s Facebook page depicts the Parkland massacre’s main spokesperson, David Hogg, in National Socialist regalia, with the caption, “We will March Until We Disarm Every American.”

 

Fitzsimons Facebook page has since been “scrubbed” of any 2018 posts, which would of course include those that may be calling the the Parkland shooting or its aftermath into question.

 

The circumstances surrounding Deputy Fitzsimon’s death are sketchy. The official cause has been attributed to cancer, yet this is contradicted by an obituary found at obittree.com, stating that he “died unexpectedly.” The “died unexpectedly” phrase is one morticians and/or loved ones sometimes employ when for one reason or another they are reluctant to disclose the true cause of death, as in the case of a suicide.

Yet as the above obituary makes clear, Fitzsimons does not seem as if he would have been a likely suicide candidate. The law enforcement officer “lived life to the fullest and enjoyed spending time loving on his many friends [sic],”the document reads. Fitzsimons was also the life of the party, according to the obituary’s author(s). “He dreamed to one day be Batman or Kenny Chesney, and you could often find him singing at a local karaoke night or taking selfies while under the disguise of the caped crusader.” Further, the deceased also had a spiritual devotion “in his Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.”

If Fitzsimons in fact died of cancer, the onset must have been extremely sudden. Neither the obituary nor accompanying memorials reference any struggle with the disease, but instead point to his inspiring presence while expressing astonishment at the abruptness of his passing.

Aside from numerous friends attesting to his warm disposition in their memorials, Deputy Fitzsimons appeared to be in excellent health, as various photos suggest.

Following the December 14, 2012 Sandy Hook School massacre numerous law enforcement officers with intimate knowledge of the event’s investigation either retired or died unexpectedly. These included Connecticut State Police Major William Podgorski, who passed on following “a brief undisclosed illness.”

As Sandy Hook researcher Tony Mead observed in 2014,

From Douglas Cottle, who died Sept 29, 2012, at age 62 to Michael Bellmore, who died May 3, 2014 at age 27, more questions than answers seem to arise. The Connecticut State Police Commander, the Connecticut State Police Commissioner, the Western Connecticut State Police Commander as well as the Connecticut State Medical Examiner have all been eliminated from the story either by retiring or death. What better way to cover up any possibility of ever disclosing the truth ? What better way to perpetuate conspiracy theories ?

Those who received word via Twitter of Fitzsimon’s untimely death have expressed similar doubt and suspicion on the vague and unusual circumstances.

https://twitter.com/browardsheriff/status/980928523694149632/photo/...

As is suggested in the aftermath of other recent mass shooting events, Fitzsimons simply may have possessed too much information, was at the wrong place at the wrong time, and/or asking sensitive questions of his peers and superiors on the specifics of the Parkland shooting. It is beyond dispute that the sheriff’s deputy had become uncomfortably outspoken on the February 14 event.

The record reflects that Deputy Fitzsimons was a wonderful individual and friend who cared about “truth” and the US Constitution. Perhaps these concerns are no longer desired by the management of certain policing agencies. There is indeed ample room for suspicion.

see all the tweets: http://yournewswire.com/broward-county-sheriff-parkland-shooting-fo...

Views: 366

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Died suddenly is not a cause of death.. a cause of death is a specific medical determination... heart attack, embolism, seizure, etc.  We don't know the cause of death.  Speculating on how he died is fruitless conjecture. 

Officer Fitzsimmons knowledge and involvement in the Parkland shooting hardly seem life-threatening revelations... Many people have conspiracy theories surrounding the Parkland shooting but haven't ended up dying suddenly and peacefully (without violence) at home.

The writer suggested Fitzsimmons was at the wrong place at the wrong time, pure speculation...and it is hardly relevant since he died peacefully (without violence) in his home. How is dying peacefully, at home, being in the wrong place and at the wrong time?

A heart attack, yea right, have you seen this man's body, he look like Conan The Barbarian.

No, I didn't say heart attack... I said we don't know.  Cause of death could be anything and yes a 42 yr old man with his physic can be subject to a heart attack.  This entire piece is an example of pure speculation... everything from what he knew or did not know about the Parkland Shootings too his cause of death... are pure speculation.

It is not good to consistently engage in speculative reasoning ... as it develops the bad habit of prematurely jumping to erroneous conclusions.

 So, its like this Ronald, Body Builders do not have heart attacks. My dad is in his 60's a body builder. The heart is a muscle, it develops with the right body structure being developed.

 And only you have speculative reasoning ... as it develops the bad habit of prematurely jumping to erroneous conclusions, to try and debunk info, and a few others have tried, all of you guys failed...

LIKE DA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Still waiting for 40 more names ... only 8 so far.  By the way, bodybuilders do have heart attacks... at higher rates than the general population.

See:  https://www.quora.com/Is-it-common-for-bodybuilders-to-die-prematur...

Prolonged exposure to professional bodybuilding lifestyle may lead to significant health issues, ranging from muscle deformities, drug overdose, obesity, organ failure, (heart is an organ), death, lack of mobility and other various health-related problems.

Statistically, there are greater chances of early death among professional bodybuilders than the general population.

 People are different. Their bodies are different, and to tell you the truth, I do not trust the reports when friends & family members call it a lie.

 I pick a side and stand with it.

Still waiting for 40 more names...now thats funny.
Prolonged exposure to professional bodybuilding lifestyle may lead to significant health issues... and that is really funny....LMBO....:)

Tif...

I was an armature bodybuilder/weightlifter... weighed 240 am 6'4", and was very athletic... I now have premature heart problems. 

Did you even bother to go to the website I provided... they will back up what I have said about bodybuilders.  You may want to research bodybuilders and heart attacks if for no other reason than to help your Dad.

As for the 48 names... there are only 8 names on page 7 of this post leaving 40 more and those names are not all doctors nor have any of them been legally tied to murder or Big Pharma... and vaccine whistleblowing.

I told you, the manes are listed all through the blog starting with page 7, hello !!!
And no, I am not permitted to go to any links provided, that will be up to my dad or his team.
And my dad is a body builder also, with no issues what so ever. A matter a fact Hank is into bodybuilding. Most of our team and family is.
I am into bodybuilding. I can bench 185lbs 1 time, I work out with 135lbs 5 sets of 5 presses. Then there is my arts training, and honey my body is powerful. now I got to get to work.
LOL Tif
A little system error here at this site, can't fix "I told you, the names", what the heck...

Your News Wire, a 3-year-old website of murky facts and slippery spin, is published by Sean Adl-Tabatabai and Sinclair Treadway — a Bernie Sanders supporter in 2016 — out of an apartment in L.A.'s historic El Royale.

"Reality is how you perceive it. You can change that perception of reality — dictate it." Most journalism barons don't deal in metaphysics. For digital upstart Sean Adl-Tabatabai, 36, who talks of "the holographic nature of the world," and his husband and business partner, Sinclair Treadway, 24, it could be a credo.

Your News Wire, their 3-year-old website of murky fact and slippery spin, has in the past year helped usher Donna Brazile out of her CNN gig and foment the Pizzagate frenzy with a key early post (which has generated 28,000 Facebook shares), all from an unlikely HQ for an alt-media operation: the couple's live/work apartment at the historic El Royale (sometime home to the likes of Katie Holmes, Josh Brolin and Cameron Diaz) in L.A.'s Hancock Park.

 Sounds just like Frank, murky facts and slippery spin, and anyway I seen the same images posted by Kristi Ann. And you did not say a word Frank....Oh Frank, I do not care if you like YourNewsWire, or any of their members.

 Everyone all ready knows most of the people here hate all Muslims, even if they are Christians, and even though they voted for Trump.

 Don't like me little YourNewsWire, tough, there is not one thing you can do about it...

LOL Frank !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert

ALERT ALERT

OMG!! -> Government Now Wants To Seize Your Car For Going 5MPH Over The Limit

We’ve discussed this on and off for several years now. Civil asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows the government to seize assets and cash from citizens without any due process or judicial oversight.

You don’t even have to be charged with a crime. You are assumed guilty unless you can somehow prove your innocence.

Of course, not everyone has this ability… if you aren’t local, state, or federal law enforcement, this is called stealing, and you go to prison.

But the government is actually a bigger problem than common thieves.

A 2015 report showed that law enforcement used civil asset forfeiture to steal more from US residents than every thief, robber, and burglar in America combined.

About $4.5 BILLION worth of cash, cars, homes, and other property is taken by civil asset forfeiture each year – hundreds of millions more than common criminals steal.

And it happens at every level. Your local cop can use civil asset forfeiture just like your state trooper. And then any one of the armed agents of the US government—from the FBI to the Fish and Wildlife Service—can rob you for whatever reason they want.

This travesty continues to grow because the cops who take your stuff get to keep it. Police departments and government agencies around the country depend on civil asset forfeiture to boost their budgets.

Cops will literally keep some of the cars they take as squad cars. And they make a fortune auctioning off the houses, boats, and anything else they confiscate.

Obviously this gives cops an incentive to steal, whether or not they actually think the property was used in a crime, or acquired illegally. Remember, civil asset forfeiture adds billions every year to their bottom line.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case of civil asset forfeiture.

Tyson Timbs was convicted of selling a small amount of drugs to an undercover police officer. He was sentenced to house arrest, and paid about $1,200 in fines.

But then police used civil asset forfeiture to take his $42,000 Land Rover which Timbs purchased with money from a life insurance policy after his father died. The money did not come from selling drugs, or any other illegal activity.

Timbs sued, and the case made its way to the Supreme Court, because every lower court in Indiana said the forfeiture was perfectly legit.

The case revolves around whether or not the seizure of the Land Rover was an excessive fine under the 8th amendment, and whether or not this protection against excessive fines applies to state governments.

And the public got some crazy insight into the government’s position.

The Indiana Solicitor General was arguing in favor of civil asset forfeiture when Justice Stephen Breyer asked him a hypothetical.

Breyer asked, if a state needs revenue, could it force someone to forfeit their Bugatti, Mercedes, or Ferrari for speeding? Even if they were going just 5 miles per hour over the speed limit?

And the utterly appalling answer from the Indiana Solicitor General was, yes.

That’s right… the official government position is that they can steal any amount of your property in “connection” with any crime whatsoever, no matter how trivial the crime may be… even exceeding the speed limit by 5 miles per hour.

This is how overbearing and authoritarian the government has become in the land of the free.

This is how much power your local cop has… and the power only grows as you go to state, and federal officials.

If there is any solace in any of this, it is that the other Supreme Court Justices were reportedly laughing at this exchange.

The justices seemed incredulous that Indiana’s top lawyer was using such absurd assertions and flimsy reasoning in his arguments.

So, for now, we can keep our cars if we get pulled over for speeding. But that may not always be the case…

Depending on how this is ruled, it could pave the way for even more egregious abuses of power… or it could curb the practice, and reign in these thieves in uniforms.

Just understand where the government is coming from. These politicians, bureaucrats and officers think they can do whatever they want. Absolutely anything goes, with no limitation whatsoever.

And that makes it a little tough to feel like you really live in the land of the free.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service