British MPs Grant Themselves Full Anonymity If Accused Of Child Rape

British MPs vote to grant themselves anonymity in the event they are accused of child rape reports: One of the deleted cases was that of Labour’s Keith Vaz, who is accused of bringing the House of Commons into disrepute by buying cocaine for male escorts.

 Seventy-nine MPs voted against an amendment that would have ensured that the names of suspects in expenses cases would be published. The 22 who supported it accused their colleagues of a cover-up.

 The vote was over a motion to bring in a new code of conduct aimed at preventing a repeat of the sexual harassment scandal that shook Westminster last year. The code increases the punishments for abusing staff, volunteers or members of the public.

 But the vote means that MPs being probed for misconduct of any nature will not now be identified. They will remain anonymous while being investigated – and might not be named even if they are judged guilty.

 Until now the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards had publicly identified MPs who are under suspicion, providing a summary of the allegations against them.

 The watchdog looks into politicians who are accused of using information for financial gain, having a conflict of interest or generally damaging the reputation and integrity of the House of Commons.

 The new code of conduct states: ‘Members’ behaviour is subject to levels of scrutiny unusual for staff.

‘There is a balance to be struck between the need for transparency about law-makers’ conduct and the danger that publication of unfounded allegations, or even minor transgressions, could have a disproportionate effect on the member.’

 Justifying the use of anonymity, the policy states that the media might try to identify the complainant, putting people off coming forward with allegations.

 In deciding whether to name the accused, the code stated that the commissioner should bear in mind ‘the effect on the responder’s reputation’ and whether it is ‘proportionate’ to name them.

 The motion set out that sexual harassment cases should be confidential – and the amendment would have prevented this anonymity applying to expenses as well.

 But MPs voted for the motion and against the amendment, ensuring all parties in all investigations escape identification. In cases of sexual harassment the British legal system allows victims to remain anonymous, while the accused is named, in part to encourage other victims to come forward.

 Yesterday, Commons Leader Andrea Leadsom urged colleagues to give the new code of conduct a ‘clean run’ by allowing anonymity for those under investigation.

 But her pleas were challenged by MPs, including the chairman of the standards committee.

Labour MP Sir Kevin Barron moved the amendment that sought to ensure the names of individuals under investigation could be published.

‘We have considered carefully the leader’s argument for making this change and we understand why she has put them forward, but we do not think that they outweigh the reputational damage that may arise if we go ahead with this proposal as it is stated,’ he said. ‘It will be presented as MPs trying to cover up their misdoings.’

 Sir Kevin added: ‘Many people outside will criticise us for rolling back the openness that was agreed back in 2010 in view of the situation with the expenses scandal.’

 His comments were echoed by other MPs. Labour’s John Mann said: ‘This process should all be transparent – the oxygen of good behavior. The danger is that it ends up like the expenses scandal at some stage in the future.’

 Fellow Labour MP Jess Phillips said if the criminal courts could maintain complete anonymity for the victims and complete transparency for those accused then she had faith that it could be done in Parliament.

 She said: ‘I do worry about how it looks in trying to pull back on transparency. I think the anonymity that is being required was a deal done by somebody in a whip’s office or somebody on some committee that controls one of our political parties.’

 Green MP Caroline Lucas said she did not believe the amendment would have undermined the confidentiality given to victims.

 Mrs Leadsom earlier told the Commons parliamentary workers would now be free from ‘unacceptable behavior, bullying and harassment’.

Views: 61

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 They create a issue then they protect them self through politics.




Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Pelosi Disaster!  95% Of Americans Tuned Out Impeachment Show Trials On Friday — Only The Second Day Of Testimony

Despite the constant hype Americans are already tuning out the sham impeachment trials.

On the second day of the public show trials 95% of Americans turned off the nonsense.

Americans are worn out by all of the fake news and hysteria.


Dan Gainor   @dangainor

Yawn: 95% of U.S. Adults Skipped Day 2 of Democrats' Impeachment Hearings 

Yawn: 95% of U.S. Adults Skipped Friday’s Impeachment Hearings

Americans aren’t exactly obsessed with the Democrats’ impeachment hearings, it seems. Friday’s second day of live, wall-to-wall coverage drew an average of 12.7 million viewers on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN,

Flashback: Horrible News For Shifty Schiff – Majority Of Americans Don’t Want Impeachment, 76% Don’t Trust Dems And Believe Media Is Pushing The Sham

No One in American Wants Impeachment except the Far-left Socialist Democrats and their Corrupt Media. They hate President Trump because he is a winner. He beat them and he’s making America great again as he said he would.

The Democrats and their corrupt media are totally blinded by their rage and they don’t realize that no one is in favor of impeachment.

We reported a week ago that FOX News released a poll where they stated that 49% of Americans were for Trump Impeachment. But their polling was flawed. The real extrapolated results of the poll using an accurate proportion of Republicans, Democrats and Independents showed that only 30% of Americans are in favor of Trump’s Impeachment and they’re all Democrats.

Next, a few days ago we reported on another poll that was consistent with the results of our extrapolated FOX News poll.

Nearly three quarters of all Americans have little or no trust in the way that Schifty Schiff is running the impeachment process –

Heritage Action   Heritage_Action

You won’t hear this in the mainstream media: Nearly three fourths of Americans have little to no trust in the House Democrats’ handling of their impeachment process. 🤔

Today another poll was released with similar results.

Most Americans believe that the corrupt media is trying to help get President Trump impeached. Three-quarter of Republicans, half of independents and even a third of Democrats believe this to be the case. No one trusts Schifty Shiff or the corrupt media pushing his impeachment sham.

IT Guy@ITGuy1959

1- "Seventy-six percent (76%) of Republicans and a plurality (48%) of voters not affiliated with either major political party say most reporters are trying to help impeach Trump, a view shared by only 36% of Democrats."

Let's recast that last phrase 

Rasmussen Reports @Rasmussen_Poll

Most Say Media Working With Democrats to Impeach Trump... 

This is perhaps the worst gaffe in modern political history.

This Schiff Show does not have a happy ending for the Democrats. Even with the support of the entire corrupt fake news media, it’s a total sham and everyone knows it!

Ranking Member Nunes breaks down House Democrats' fake impeachment inquiry

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service