The British Government has begun promoting Islam by distributing “free scarves” to women who express an interest in wearing the full Islamic Hijab.  The free hijab scheme was announced as part of World Hijab Day on 1 February. British government literature promoting the pro-Hijab event describe the face-covering veil as “liberating“, despite the fact Muslim women around the world are rejecting the veil as oppressive.


The British government has begun promoting Islam by distributing "free scarves" to women who express an interest in wearing the Islamic Hijab.

Would you like to try on a Hijab or learn why Muslim women wear the headscarf? Come along to our walk-in event. Free scarfs for all those that choose to wear it for the day or part of the day. Muslim women, along with followers of many other religions, choose to wear the Hijab. Many find liberation, respect and security through wearing it. #StrongInHijab. Join us for #WorldHijabDay.

 Why is the British government proselytizing on behalf of Islam, and issuing absurd propaganda about the Islamic headscarf to its citizens?

 The Hijab remains one of the Muslim world’s most barbaric and archaic customs. By robbing women of the right to show their face in public, they are treated as second class citizens, and oppressed by the institutions that should be offering them support.

 While Iranian women are burning the Hijab in massive protests against their Islamic government, and the Danish government has announced a ban on the Hijab in public, the British government is encouraging women to “liberate” themselves by donning the full-face veil.

We are fighting against the most visible symbol of oppression,” anti-Hijab activist Masih Alinejad told Reuters on World Hijab Day, adding: “These women are saying, ‘It is enough – it is the 21st century and we want to be our true selves.’”

[RELATED: Queen Elizabeth Claims She Is ‘Direct Descendant Of Proph...

 Masih Alinejad hosts the website My Stealthy Freedom where women in Iran post photos of themselves without Hijabs.

 The FCO has not yet responded to the requests for information regarding how much British tax payers’ money was spent proselytizing on behalf of Islam and distributing free Hijabs to women.

Views: 20

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Old news but what the hell share it.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Democrat Sen. Chris Murphy: ‘The Real Second Amendment Isn’t Absolute

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) tweeted Saturday there is a “real” Second Amendment and an “imaginary” one and he believes the real one is “not absolute.”

Murphy, “I support the real 2nd Amendment, not the imaginary 2nd Amendment. And the real 2nd Amendment isn’t absolute.”

The statement was a precursor to his call for banning “assault rifles” in the wake of the Santa Fe High School shooting, even though “assault rifles” were not used in the attack.

Murphy said the “real 2nd Amendment…allows Congress to wake up to reality and ban these assault rifles that are designed for one purpose only – to kill as many people as fast as possible.”

Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) said the Santa Fe High School attackers used a .38 revolver and a shotgun to carry out his heinous acts. Therefore, a ban on “assault rifles” would have done nothing to prevent the attack from occurring or the tragic loss of life from taking place.

It should be noted that Saturday was not the first time Sen. Murphy called the essence of the Second Amendment into question. On August 6, 2013, Breitbart News reported that Murphy told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that “The Second Amendment is not an absolute right, not a God-given right. It has always had conditions upon it like the First Amendment has.”

Murphy did not grapple with the words, “Shall not be infringed.”

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service