BREAKING – Republican Traitors BETRAY Trump, Issue Sick Message About Tax Cuts

Fiscally conservative and patriotic Republicans in the House have some GOP traitors in the midst. We the People need to vote these RINOs out of office as soon as possible.

A group of Republicans are trying to thwart President Trump’s plan to change the tax code. “I’m not very enthused about it,” said Republican Utah Senator Orrin Hatch, said about the corporate tax plan. Hatch is the chairman of the Finance Committee. (via Associated Press)

Texas Senator John Cornyn is also questioning the job-creation tax plan. To entice companies to stay or return to the United States, we have to reduce our corporate tax rates – which are the highest in the entire world. “The question is, who is going to pay the tax?” Senator Cornyn asked. “Is it going to be our citizens?”

President Trump and the Republican majority are the first national leaders in three decades to push for a tax code overhaul. The House plan would drastically reduce the 35 percent tax on company profits.

The current plan is filled with special exemptions, deductions, and various credits. The cumbersome and confusing corporate tax plan would be replaced with simple “border adjustment tax.”

Trump’s plan will have Americans companies, which sell or produce products in the United States, to pay only a 20 percent tax on business profits. If the company exports its products, the profits from such sales would NOT be taxed in America.

Foreign companies who import products into the United States would also have to pay the border adjustment tax. The plan being pushed by Trump and sensible Republicans would help blue collar workers and middle class Americans, who are struggling to compete with cheap foreign labor.

House Speaker Paul Ryan and Texas Representative Kevin Brady, the chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, are championing the new corporate tax plan. Representative Brady believes the proposed tax reform plan will give a much needed boost to American manufacturers.

“This tax has a simple but powerful principle, which is every product and service that is consumed in the United States will have an equal business tax rate of 20 percent,” Brady stated. “That not only levels the playing field between our foreign competitors in America, it gives our made in America products a fighting chance both here and abroad and eliminates any tax incentives to move U.S. jobs or manufacturing and research overseas.”

House Republicans behind the plan staunchly maintain the new tax structure would generate more than $1 trillion in revenue over the course of 10 years. No Democrats have signed on to support the plan.

The border tax adjustment can pass without a problem as long as ALL Republicans stay together and focus on the big picture — jobs. It is not the government’s duty or its place to create jobs, but it is necessary for our leaders to facilitate an environment where the private sector can thrive.

Americans businesses both large and small are barely surviving. It is impossible to go little more than a week without hearing of more stores closing. Highly successful and long-standing retailers like Macy’s JC Penney, Elder Beerman, Kmart, Sears, and host of others, closed their cash registers for the final time during the past eight years.

http://www.angrypatriotmovement.com/republicans-betray-trump-over-tax/

Related image

Views: 797

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

No one should have to pick up the Tax. congress needs to do just like we do budget and get rid of the dead weight fed agencies and alphabet soup that is down in DC.  You Make do with what you have , cut the waste and tighten your Belts!!.

The Republican senate is going to be a problem for President Trump.

I hope he is currently working to bring those RINOS to the conservative table to join the rest of us here at

We the People.

It is close to impossible to withstand the destructiveness of treason within.

 

RHINO is pablum and distracts from what they really are.

Bible..."Your worst enemy will seem to your face as your best friend."

Call them who they really are "TRAITOR".  And treat them accordingly. 

agreeing with the point about  - Your worst enemy will seem to your face as your best friend."

Call them who they really are "TRAITOR".  And treat them accordingly. 

..and that Rino is too bland... but it's also a misnomer. those typically called rinos are in fact exactly what republican party has been since it's inception. A fed/gov empowering party at it's core.  The traitors to our country are indeed traitors, but RINOs they're not.

So are you saying that the concept of the GOP to end slavery in America was wrong? Do you think the party of the KKK, the Democrat Party was right?

Bob

no, the concept of ending slavery wasn't wrong - but it wasn't Lincoln's mission/motivation. ..per his letter to Horace Greeley;

 http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm

and when he died the then current R party dominated congress made it a top priority to push through the 14th amendment anyways - against the ascended President Johnson's(D) high priority efforts, which wasn't necessary to free the slaves. The 13th amendment accomplished freeing the slaves, the 14th was solely to make the states subordinate to fed/gov - as well as all of us individually by making us codified citizens of the U.S. and therefor having authority over us individually, when up until that point we were citizens of our states 1st and fed/gov's authority over us had to 1st be filtered through the states. Things like the 16th amendment, and obiecare's mandate were enabled with that subtle codified change.

Neither Lincoln's (R party's 1st president) or R party's insisting on passing the 14th amendment  were about freeing slaves. They were about 'restoring national authority', as Lincoln made clear in the letter.

Absolutely.  I can STILL hear my 8th grade history teacher Mrs. Fabre telling us before the semester test on the civil war, that if ANY of us put down for the reason the civil war started was to free the slaves....she'd flunk us for that semester.

The underlying motive for the South leaving the Union was slavery... it created the problem with State's rights, the reciprocation of State laws,  unfair export taxes/duties, and the refusal to honor personal property claims of those in the South for the looses suffered from northern emancipationist, who were stealing their slaves.  The North declared war over Ft. Sumpter and the attempt by S. Carolina to cease it and its armaments.

Restoring national authority may be the stated reason for Lincoln but the mess got started because of the South position on slavery.

In other words, what difference does it make?

when the original point made was that R party has been empowering fed/gov since it's inception, and that makes the typical usage of rino a misnomer - I think Lincoln's stated reason of 'restore national authority' is a relevant point - along with the points made about the 14thA and how it was passed and by who.

... I think arguing over whether the principles our founding design was based on were worth discarding to essentially speed up what would've happened naturally at a slower pace, and the terrible consequences since is outside the original point.

My point is there are far more important issues to apply our resources to.

Divide and conquer is Slewfoot's claim to fame.

Let's focus on burying liberal thinking. Or should I correct that to liberal insanity?

well.. I think my original point was in response and agreement with yours

- Bible..."Your worst enemy will seem to your face as your best friend."

... if embracing that worst enemy due to it appearing less bad than the 'liberal' and joining in on trashing the liberal with that worst enemy is your point now -- I'll just have to chalk it up to being the standard partisan mindset that makes little sense to me.

pardon my agreeing with your original point. i'll try not to do it again.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service