BREAKING: Judge Gives Hillary Bad News

Of all the absurd things written and said during the 2016 election cycle, former New York Times editor Jill Abramson’s statement that “Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest and trustworthy,” has to be in the running for the most ridiculous. Even most Democrats didn’t believe that whopper.

In perhaps the least surprising news of the day, Hillary Clinton’s legal team is now facing a new investigation into whether they intentionally destroyed evidence in an active investigation. A Maryland judge ruled on Monday that the state bar must investigate three of Clinton’s lawyers, citing credible allegations that the three destroyed thousands of pages of Clinton’s emails.

So much for “fundamentally honest and trustworthy.”

The Players

The investigation was launched against Clinton lawyers David Kendall, Cheryl Mills, and Heather Samuelson.

The court ordered the state bar, which had declined to pursue the allegations, to investigate, saying that the case against the lawyers “appears to have merit.”

According to the Washington Times:

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court Judge Paul F. Harris Jr. said the complaints lodged against David E. Kendall, Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson were egregious and the state bar couldn’t dismiss them as frivolous.

The complaint against Clinton’s lawyers was filed by Ty Clevenger, a Texas attorney with a reputation for crusading against political corruption. Clevenger is perhaps best known for his takedown of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican.

The Allegations

In his complaint, Clevenger alleged:

All three attorneys represented former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and were responsible for deleting thousands of emails that had been stored on a secret email server that Mrs. Clinton used in lieu of a government email account.

On December 2, 2014, the chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi of the U.S. House of Representatives sent a letter to Mr. Kendall requesting all emails from Mrs. Clinton’s private account that were related to Benghazi….At that point, there is no question that Mr. Kendall knew that at least some of the emails were evidence.

Nonetheless, he and Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson began deleting Mrs. Clinton’s emails some time in the following two months. In a July 5, 2016 public statement, FBI Director James Comey indicated that his agents recovered some of the deleted emails, further stating that “several thousand” of the deleted emails were work-related.

It should shock no one that Hillary’s lawyers were busy obstructing justice by deleting emails and destroying evidence during an active investigation. What is shocking is that they (and their boss) have largely escaped unpunished.

Corruption Exposed

This isn’t a coincidence. Rather, it’s a sordid example of political corruption. Put simply, Hillary was treated as above the law, due to her standing as a major political candidate for office.

Recent transcripts from the Office of Special Counsel, a government watchdog agency, revealed that FBI Director James Comey drafted a statement rejecting criminal charges against Clinton two months before the agency interviewed her, a clear case of “prejudgment.” As Senators Chuck Grassley and Lindsey Graham put it: “Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation.”

That’s exactly the approach taken by the Maryland State Bar, which initially dismissed Clevenger’s complaint against Clinton’s lawyers as “frivolous,” and refused to investigate further. Monday’s court decision is a sharp rebuke to that kind of politically motivated “see no evil” approach.

Will justice be served this time?

It remains to be seen whether the ordered investigation will be conducted in an evenhanded and unbiased manner.

It may be wishful thinking to hope that this is the investigation that finally brings Mrs. Clinton and her lawyers to account for their blatant obstruction of justice and flouting of the law.

But as Mr. Clevenger notes, the potential for disbarment exists and “Whereas Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson are primarily political hacks, Mr. Kendall practices law full time and presumably needs his law license more than his co-conspirators colleagues.”

If just one of Hillary Clinton’s corrupt legal team faces the consequences for destroying evidence, obstructing investigations and flouting the law, it’s a small victory for justice in America.

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/bad-new...

Yeah yeah yeah....more investigations.  And THEN what?  Bad news for Hillary?  I'll believe that when I see video of her being walked to prison with handcuffs on.

Views: 285

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

So again possibly everyone found to be protecting the witch from Ark. will go down and she will go without charges. If I were her legal team I would hide before they get toe tags at the local morque. Why would anyone protect such a nasty person as Hillary Clinton?

She's like a horror movie, evil never dies.  At least not until you drive a stake through the heart or a silver bullet...   If the people who surround her had any brains, they'd all chip in on a hitman before she gets to them.

I am convinced that she is a sociopath. Guilty of nothing in her own mind, and everyone else is to blame. She fits it perfectly. No remorse, no guilt, no shame.

Hillary has nearly all the symptoms of narcissism and an anti-social personality:

Narcissistic Personality Disorder:

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of empathy as indicated by 5 or more of the following:

  • Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (exaggerates achievements, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
  • Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited power, success, brilliance, beauty or ideal love
  • Believes her or she is “special” and can only be understood by similarly special, high status people
  • Requires excessive admiration
  • Has a sense of entitlement
  • Is interpersonally exploitative
  • Lacks empathy
  • Is envious of others or believes others are envious of him/her
  • Shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

AND

Antisocial Personality Disorder:

A pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others, occurring since age 15, as evidenced by 3 or more of the following:

  • Failure to conform to social norms as evidenced by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
  • Deceitfulness
  • Impulsivity
  • Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
  • Reckless disregard for the safety of others
  • Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial commitments
  • Lack of remorse, as being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt others
  • The individual is at least 18 years of age


I mean really.....is there ANY doubt she's mentally unqualified for almost anything?

Manipulation, No Emotion: Chilling Sociopath Traits

To a sociopath, people are toys or pawns to mess with and manipulate. The world is but a circus, and the sociopath is the ringmaster. He manipulates and controls who he wants, how he wants, and whenever he wants. He plays the game of life for fun and personal gain.

Perhaps one single trait of a sociopath allows all of the others to exist. This one trait leads to the other characteristics of a sociopath. The sociopath feels no empathy, no emotion.

The sociopath is unencumbered by feelings such as fear, anxiety, stress, depression, remorse, guilt, caring, and love (Do Sociopaths Cry or Even Have Feelings?).

A woman who for a long time was married to a sociopath and suffered many consequences, writes, "One of the most prominent and telling traits of many sociopaths is their fantastic ability to manipulate others and lie for profit, to avoid punishment, or simply just for fun" (Buttafuoco, 2009).

The traits of a sociopath portray someone who doesn't care what his traits and characteristics are, as long as he can use them to his advantage.

Frankly, at this point, what difference does it make?

Great post Jea9...  Sounds like we have a lot of sociopaths in government.

It does, doesn't it....? sigh

If that doesn't adequately describe Barack Obama I don't know what does.

What a joke... asking the Maryland State Bar to investigate CRIMINAL CONDUCT by members of the Bar?  That is tantamount to askng the Fox to investigate the case of the missing chickens in the Hen House.  

The Maryland Bar previously refused to investigate... claiming the case against Hillary's Attorneys was frivilous. Now, a Judge comes along and orders them to investigate... The People are supposed to believe that the Maryland Bar will suddenly reform and  do a proper job investigating... How will that work?  Yeah, the Maryland Bar will investigate Hillary's lawyers, just like Comey and the FBI investigated Hillary. Comey prepaired a statement exonertaing Hillary before the investigation was completed ... even, before the FBI interviewed Hillary and key witnesses to the alledged crimes.  Some investigation, RIGHT? 

Politican like diseased cattle on the farm, what do you do with diseased cattle?
I look for ways to be optimistic and all I can logically see is Jesus Christ. The government is totally disfunctional in corruption, I trust no politican and have little left for Trump. Unless the American people call to arms their is no hope without Christ.
Col. do you remember the days in the Nam, many Solder's and Marines had 91st Psalm hanging in the hootches. I still read this particular Psalm considering where we are today.
Thanks for your comments.

Yes, I recall my days in Nam... there are no atheist in fox holes and I always appreciated it when the Chaplin came around ... for services... they were always packed out.  I reciet Psalm 91 frequently.  God bless you and yours with peace, prosperity and health...

Image result for mr magoo animation

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

Facebook & Twitter

ALERT ALERT

BREAKING: Hillary Admits She Was Wrong About ‘Deplorables,’
White Nationalists Only ‘0.15%’ Of U.S. Population

(TeaParty.org) – Hillary Clinton, the failed liberal presidential candidate who sealed her fate by slamming half of U.S. voters as a load of racist, sexist, xenophobic “deplorables,” just came out and admitted she was wrong, Breitbart reports.

Speaking with Hugh Hewitt on his radio show about her book “What Happened,” he asked her if she actually believes that half of the American population are white nationalists and racists.

“Of the 62.9 million people who voted for President Trump, do you have a number in your mind that you think are actually white nationalist racists of that 62.9 million, a real number?” he asked.

“No, I don’t,” she said.

Still have any doubts? Later in the conversation, Hewitt asked the same question again. “Do you think there are more than a half million, you know, honest-to-God white nationalists running around the United States?”

Clinton: “Probably not, no.”

A white nationalist would like to establish a sovereign country for people of white European heritage, an idea everyone across the political spectrum finds unspeakably intolerable and offensive. Now, the woman who declared that this was the desire of more than half of Americans is saying that virtually nobody wants it. On both counts, she’s completely wrong.

There’s no doubt that Clinton is probably going to try running again for president in 2020 – if she’s even alive that long – and might be trying to absolve her guilt and pander to all those “undecideds” who instantly went MAGA the second she blasted them as no-good racist deplorables for not voting Democrat.

However, Clinton did later admit that there were more white nationalists in America than she had thought. Expressing her worries that the internet and the presidency of Trump is giving them a voice and a platform, she hinted that under her iron scepter, she will attempt to silence them.

“Unfortunately, their views, which used to be quite beyond the mainstream, you know, have a much broader audience now, because you know, of being online and having outlets and media presence that can promote those attitudes,” she said.

How many white nationalists are there in the United States? That’s a question with troublingly few answers, since for some mysterious reason the liberal mainstream media – even though it claims all the time that white supremacy is on the rise – hasn’t actually bothered to take polls and just ask people whether they are white nationalists.

Actually, there’s a simple answer to that. If such a poll were to be taken, our bet is that liberals would be very disappointed to discover that almost nobody is actually a white nationalist, and so there would be no way they could continue scaring people with those fears. A tactic Clinton has apparently given up on.

Left-wingers are entirely convinced that some vague but large majority of people who say they aren’t racists or white nationalists, actually share a lot of views with them – which is why Nazi and white supremacist have become interchangeable with Republican and libertarian.

An article by Newsweek, which polled around 5,000 in order address this very question, came up with this response:

About 70 percent of respondents strongly agreed that people of different races should be “free to live wherever they choose” and that “all races are equal,” and 89 percent agreed that all races should be treated equally. At the same time, 31 percent of respondents said they strongly or somewhat agreed that the country needs to “protect and preserve its White European heritage,” while 34 percent strongly or somewhat disagreed and 29 percent said they neither agreed nor disagreed.

Reality is, it’s a little true that some Americans do have overlapping views with white nationalists, but the overwhelming majority of respondents STRONGLY believe that the races should be free, are equal, and should be treated equally. Sounds like none of these respondents would be joining a lynch mob or waging a second Holocaust any time soon – trying to equate the preservation of white heritage with support for slavery and genocide is obviously one of the Left’s biggest lies, and the very reason why 39 percent of people in this same survey believe white people are under attack.

So Clinton changes her mind, and now says she believes less than one percent of the American population are white nationalists – did she believe there were even LESS than that during the campaign trail? Either way, she’s either just lying or plain stupid.

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service