BREAKING: Judge Gives Hillary Bad News

Of all the absurd things written and said during the 2016 election cycle, former New York Times editor Jill Abramson’s statement that “Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest and trustworthy,” has to be in the running for the most ridiculous. Even most Democrats didn’t believe that whopper.

In perhaps the least surprising news of the day, Hillary Clinton’s legal team is now facing a new investigation into whether they intentionally destroyed evidence in an active investigation. A Maryland judge ruled on Monday that the state bar must investigate three of Clinton’s lawyers, citing credible allegations that the three destroyed thousands of pages of Clinton’s emails.

So much for “fundamentally honest and trustworthy.”

The Players

The investigation was launched against Clinton lawyers David Kendall, Cheryl Mills, and Heather Samuelson.

The court ordered the state bar, which had declined to pursue the allegations, to investigate, saying that the case against the lawyers “appears to have merit.”

According to the Washington Times:

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court Judge Paul F. Harris Jr. said the complaints lodged against David E. Kendall, Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson were egregious and the state bar couldn’t dismiss them as frivolous.

The complaint against Clinton’s lawyers was filed by Ty Clevenger, a Texas attorney with a reputation for crusading against political corruption. Clevenger is perhaps best known for his takedown of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican.

The Allegations

In his complaint, Clevenger alleged:

All three attorneys represented former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and were responsible for deleting thousands of emails that had been stored on a secret email server that Mrs. Clinton used in lieu of a government email account.

On December 2, 2014, the chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi of the U.S. House of Representatives sent a letter to Mr. Kendall requesting all emails from Mrs. Clinton’s private account that were related to Benghazi….At that point, there is no question that Mr. Kendall knew that at least some of the emails were evidence.

Nonetheless, he and Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson began deleting Mrs. Clinton’s emails some time in the following two months. In a July 5, 2016 public statement, FBI Director James Comey indicated that his agents recovered some of the deleted emails, further stating that “several thousand” of the deleted emails were work-related.

It should shock no one that Hillary’s lawyers were busy obstructing justice by deleting emails and destroying evidence during an active investigation. What is shocking is that they (and their boss) have largely escaped unpunished.

Corruption Exposed

This isn’t a coincidence. Rather, it’s a sordid example of political corruption. Put simply, Hillary was treated as above the law, due to her standing as a major political candidate for office.

Recent transcripts from the Office of Special Counsel, a government watchdog agency, revealed that FBI Director James Comey drafted a statement rejecting criminal charges against Clinton two months before the agency interviewed her, a clear case of “prejudgment.” As Senators Chuck Grassley and Lindsey Graham put it: “Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation.”

That’s exactly the approach taken by the Maryland State Bar, which initially dismissed Clevenger’s complaint against Clinton’s lawyers as “frivolous,” and refused to investigate further. Monday’s court decision is a sharp rebuke to that kind of politically motivated “see no evil” approach.

Will justice be served this time?

It remains to be seen whether the ordered investigation will be conducted in an evenhanded and unbiased manner.

It may be wishful thinking to hope that this is the investigation that finally brings Mrs. Clinton and her lawyers to account for their blatant obstruction of justice and flouting of the law.

But as Mr. Clevenger notes, the potential for disbarment exists and “Whereas Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson are primarily political hacks, Mr. Kendall practices law full time and presumably needs his law license more than his co-conspirators colleagues.”

If just one of Hillary Clinton’s corrupt legal team faces the consequences for destroying evidence, obstructing investigations and flouting the law, it’s a small victory for justice in America.

https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/government-corruption/bad-new...

Yeah yeah yeah....more investigations.  And THEN what?  Bad news for Hillary?  I'll believe that when I see video of her being walked to prison with handcuffs on.

Views: 308

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

So again possibly everyone found to be protecting the witch from Ark. will go down and she will go without charges. If I were her legal team I would hide before they get toe tags at the local morque. Why would anyone protect such a nasty person as Hillary Clinton?

She's like a horror movie, evil never dies.  At least not until you drive a stake through the heart or a silver bullet...   If the people who surround her had any brains, they'd all chip in on a hitman before she gets to them.

I am convinced that she is a sociopath. Guilty of nothing in her own mind, and everyone else is to blame. She fits it perfectly. No remorse, no guilt, no shame.

Hillary has nearly all the symptoms of narcissism and an anti-social personality:

Narcissistic Personality Disorder:

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of empathy as indicated by 5 or more of the following:

  • Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (exaggerates achievements, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
  • Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited power, success, brilliance, beauty or ideal love
  • Believes her or she is “special” and can only be understood by similarly special, high status people
  • Requires excessive admiration
  • Has a sense of entitlement
  • Is interpersonally exploitative
  • Lacks empathy
  • Is envious of others or believes others are envious of him/her
  • Shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

AND

Antisocial Personality Disorder:

A pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others, occurring since age 15, as evidenced by 3 or more of the following:

  • Failure to conform to social norms as evidenced by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
  • Deceitfulness
  • Impulsivity
  • Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
  • Reckless disregard for the safety of others
  • Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial commitments
  • Lack of remorse, as being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt others
  • The individual is at least 18 years of age


I mean really.....is there ANY doubt she's mentally unqualified for almost anything?

Manipulation, No Emotion: Chilling Sociopath Traits

To a sociopath, people are toys or pawns to mess with and manipulate. The world is but a circus, and the sociopath is the ringmaster. He manipulates and controls who he wants, how he wants, and whenever he wants. He plays the game of life for fun and personal gain.

Perhaps one single trait of a sociopath allows all of the others to exist. This one trait leads to the other characteristics of a sociopath. The sociopath feels no empathy, no emotion.

The sociopath is unencumbered by feelings such as fear, anxiety, stress, depression, remorse, guilt, caring, and love (Do Sociopaths Cry or Even Have Feelings?).

A woman who for a long time was married to a sociopath and suffered many consequences, writes, "One of the most prominent and telling traits of many sociopaths is their fantastic ability to manipulate others and lie for profit, to avoid punishment, or simply just for fun" (Buttafuoco, 2009).

The traits of a sociopath portray someone who doesn't care what his traits and characteristics are, as long as he can use them to his advantage.

Frankly, at this point, what difference does it make?

Great post Jea9...  Sounds like we have a lot of sociopaths in government.

It does, doesn't it....? sigh

If that doesn't adequately describe Barack Obama I don't know what does.

What a joke... asking the Maryland State Bar to investigate CRIMINAL CONDUCT by members of the Bar?  That is tantamount to askng the Fox to investigate the case of the missing chickens in the Hen House.  

The Maryland Bar previously refused to investigate... claiming the case against Hillary's Attorneys was frivilous. Now, a Judge comes along and orders them to investigate... The People are supposed to believe that the Maryland Bar will suddenly reform and  do a proper job investigating... How will that work?  Yeah, the Maryland Bar will investigate Hillary's lawyers, just like Comey and the FBI investigated Hillary. Comey prepaired a statement exonertaing Hillary before the investigation was completed ... even, before the FBI interviewed Hillary and key witnesses to the alledged crimes.  Some investigation, RIGHT? 

Politican like diseased cattle on the farm, what do you do with diseased cattle?
I look for ways to be optimistic and all I can logically see is Jesus Christ. The government is totally disfunctional in corruption, I trust no politican and have little left for Trump. Unless the American people call to arms their is no hope without Christ.
Col. do you remember the days in the Nam, many Solder's and Marines had 91st Psalm hanging in the hootches. I still read this particular Psalm considering where we are today.
Thanks for your comments.

Yes, I recall my days in Nam... there are no atheist in fox holes and I always appreciated it when the Chaplin came around ... for services... they were always packed out.  I reciet Psalm 91 frequently.  God bless you and yours with peace, prosperity and health...

Image result for mr magoo animation

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Pat Cross

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

TEA PARTY -> Lois Lerner Case Explodes:
IRS Docs Link McCain’s Office To Tea Party Attacks

[CLICK TO VIEW]

Since announcing his brain cancer was terminal, Arizon Sen. John McCain has continued to make headlines, but not due to his medical status. Instead, it has been one controversy after another revolving around him, and now one more had been added to the list.

This one is based in his dislike not for Ted Cruz or Rand Paul, but of the tea party.

McCain has never really endeared himself to conservatives, and he made his feeling public about the tea party movement at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor in 2015, according to a Yahoo report.

“I think also — I probably shouldn’t say this — but some of (the tea party) appeals to the bad angels of our nature rather than the better angels of our nature,” McCain said.

This attitude ties into the latest scandal swirling around McCain.

One of a number of scandals that plagued President Barack Obama and his administration involved the IRS targeting tea party groups after 2010. It seemed that their tax-exempt status requests were denied or delayed due to intense political partisanship in the agency.

In May 2013, The Washington Post reported that the IRS’s exempt-organizations division director Lois Lerner “let slip” the week prior “that low-level IRS staffers had focused extra scrutiny on conservative groups with words such as ‘tea party’ or ‘patriot’ in their names.”

In addition, “internal reviews have shown that Lerner knew about the targeting in 2011 — but neither Congress nor the public knew until (2013).” Despite this, Lerner was never prosecuted and was allowed to retire with her taxpayer-funded pension intact.

This did not change, even after House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, a Texas Republican, and Tax Policy Subcommittee Chairman Peter Roskam, an Illinois Republican, wrote a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions. In it, they begged him to reopen a probe into the matter, according to Jay Sekulow, chief council for the American Center for Law and Justice, writing in a commentary for Fox News.

When President Donald Trump was sworn into office, some held out hope that the perceived injustices from Obama’s tenure would somehow be made right. However, in September 2017, Trump’s administration had already preemptively declined to pursue criminal charges against Lerner “based on the available evidence,” according to Fox News.

But more has since been uncovered about the scandal. Government watchdog group Judicial Watch has obtained and released “internal IRS documents, including material revealing that Sen. John McCain’s former staff director and chief counsel on the Senate Homeland Security Permanent Subcommittee, Henry Kerner, urged top IRS officials, including then-director of exempt organizations Lois Lerner, to “audit so many that it becomes financially ruinous.”

Judicial Watch �dd0e

JW President @TomFitton: Much of what you know about the IRS scandal is thanks to JW... Our new docs show the scandal is bipartisan in nature. A McCain staffer suggested Lois Lerner audit all of the 501(c)(4) groups in a way that'd be financially ruinous.

Meeting notes from April 30, 2013, involving Kerner, Lerner, “and other high-ranking IRS officials” were obtained by JW. With the meeting taking place only 10 days before the IRS scandal exploded into the public view, they are particularly incriminating against Kerner and Lerner:

“Henry Kerner asked how to get to the abuse of organizations claiming section 501 (c)(4) but designed to be primarily political. Lois Lerner said the system works, but not in real time.”

“Henry Kerner noted that these organizations don’t disclose donors. Lois Lerner said that if they don’t meet the requirements, we can come in and revoke, but it doesn’t happen timely.”

“Nan Marks said if the concern is that organizations engaging in this activity don’t disclose donors, then the system doesn’t work. Henry Kerner said that maybe the solution is to audit so many that it is financially ruinous. Nikole noted that we have budget constraints.”

“Elise Bean suggested using the list of organizations that made independent expenditures. Lois Lerner said that it is her job to oversee it all, not just political campaign activity.”

Thus far, there is no evidence that McCain knew about or directed Kerner to take such action. It is plausible that Kerner, knowing of McCain’s dislike of the tea party, opted to be a proactive and loyal staffer by urging the IRS to take action against the groups.

But McCain’s personality does little to keep him far removed from the scandal and tongues are wagging with speculation as to his involvement. Regardless, McCain’s frosty relationship with President Donald Trump has not made the Arizona senator many fans among Trump supporters.

New suspicions about him betraying the tea party won’t help matters at all.

OMG

Chelsea Handler Says Fox Doesn’t Work With
Black People, Obviously Doesn’t Watch Network

Humor is supposed to be based on truth. After all, the reason we laugh at a joke or scenario is because it triggers a feeling of recognition about reality, especially if it’s presented in an unexpected way.

It doesn’t look like “comedian” Chelsea Handler has a very firm grasp on truth or reality, however.

After a production error during a Fox News broadcast was called out by users on Twitter, the raunchy and sex-obsessed Handler tried to bash the network … but ended up showing off her ignorance instead.

“Fox News honored Aretha Franklin by using a graphic that contained a photo of Patti LaBelle,” the comedian and television host posted on Twitter Thursday evening.

That part was true enough: Fox admitted that they made a mistake on a background slide during a tribute to the late soul singer, and accidentally showed a faded photo of LaBelle. The main image still showed Franklin, who passed away on Thursday in Detroit.

Broadcast television is complex, which you would think Handler understands after being involved in TV for many years. Honest mistakes happen on every network. But no: In Handler’s alternate reality, the only explanation for the mistake was racism.

“It’s probably hard for anyone who works at Fox News to tell black people apart because they’ve never worked with any,” she declared.

Chelsea Handler  @chelseahandler

Fox News honored Aretha Franklin by using a graphic that contained a photo of Patti LaBelle. It’s probably hard for anyone who works at Fox News to tell black people apart because they’ve never worked with any.

Was she trying to be bitter or funny? It was hard to tell, but either way, that statement shows just how isolated the Hollywood left is from reality.

If she really believes that Fox has “never worked with any” black people, maybe she should try an experiment: Actually watch the channel for a minute.

She would probably tune in to the face of Harris Faulkner, the enthusiastic and Emmy-winning host of “Outnumbered,” which airs every single weekday.

Or, maybe she could get a clue from Deneen Borelli, another well-known face of Fox News for nearly a decade. How about the venerable Juan Williams, co-host of “The Five” and a “Fox News Sunday” regular for over 20 years?

Nah. They apparently don’t count, because Handler would rather live in an alternate reality of ignorance than admit she was the one making racial assumptions.

We’re not finished! Moving on to frequent guest contributors to Fox News, how about Candace Owens? Brandon Tatum? Ben Carson? Larry Elder? All of these smart individuals are familiar faces at Fox, and all are — look closely! — African American.

That’s saying nothing of the behind-the-scenes staff at Fox, a good number of whom are of course black. In fact, it’s completely possible the photo mix-up was accidentally made by a black employee. Handler openly assumed the race of the staff members who made the error, while knowing nothing.

Once again, the left has tipped their hand and revealed just how elitist and out of touch they are.

Handler has likely never turned on Fox News in her life, yet she thinks she’s an expert on it. She eagerly diminishes and waves away the contributions of black Americans to one of the most popular news stations in the nation, while lecturing others about race.

This type of attitude implies that only “liberal approved” black voices count. If they don’t parrot a 43-year-old white comedian’s politics, they’re invisible to her.

That arrogant view, and not an honest editing mistake, is perhaps the real outrage here … and it’s exactly why so many black voters are walking away from the left.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service