Border Agent: US Should Follow Mexico's Lead in Deporting Illegals

A U.S. Border Patrol agent says the United States should take a cue from Mexico, which last year deported more illegal immigrants than this country.

Appearing Tuesday on Fox News Channel's "Your World with Neil Cavuto," Chris Cabrera of the National Border Patrol Council noted that it is a felony simply to cross into Mexico illegally, unlike in the United States.

At the same time, Cabrera said, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto is trying to get the United States to relax its rules allowing Mexicans to immigrate here.

"It's defies logic on his stance on how we should be as strong as they are," Cabrera said.

Mexico deported 107, 199 Central American immigrants by land in 2014, and the United States deported 104,688, Breitbart reported on December 29.

Cabrera was critical of President Barack Obama's executive action in late last year that granted legal status to millions of more illegal immigrants.

Read more: http://www.newsmax.com/US/border-patrol-deport-illegals/2015/01/06/...

Views: 449

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Deportations severely down since Obama.  He needs those votes.  Not most from Mexico either.  Better reason to deport.  I don't see what the problem is - find them return them.  This is what the agency was built for from the beginning.

I read they were deported on paper only. When they don't show up for their deportation hearing they mark it deported but the body of the person never leaves.

ARTICLE V CONVENTION OF STATES; ARE YOU WILLING TO CHANGE THE STATUS QUO IN D.C.?

 

One of our astute and true conservative members of this site has drafted suggested changes to the Constitution to be proposed in an Article V, Convention of States. I know many of you have seen his postings on here about this issue. Mr. Oren Long is very knowledgeable and well educated and has honorably served our country. He has put a tremendous amount of time and thought into ways to, in his words, "armor and reinforce" the Constitution and return it to its Original Intent, as envisioned by the Founders.

Therefore, because I agree with every one of his suggested changes, I am publishing it for him, with his permission. I truly hope that we, as a group, as conservatives and as a people who believe that our country is heading toward disaster, because of the course we are on, I fully endorse his recommended suggestions. I believe that we must take any and every course of action we can to “stop the madness”

It is quite long, so PLEASE take the time to read each and every one of them. I am sure that some or many, may have suggestions to this document and they are welcome and open to discussion. If you agree with this, please call your State elected officials and urge them to get on board with an Article V Convention of States.

To review or obtain more information of this process, please visit one of these sites:   

http://www.conventionofstates.com/          

http://www.cosaction.com/           

 

To Whom It May Concern,

The following is neither sanctioned by nor proposed by the Article V Convention of States Project.   Rather, it is entirely my work as a volunteer for the Convention of States Project.   To give you an overview of the kinds of amendments that may or may not be considered in an Article V Convention of States Convention.

The entire thrust of an Article V Convention of States is to consider, and possibly draft, amendments designed to limit the size, scope, power, and authority of the Federal Government and bring it back under the confines of those powers granted to it in the Constitution.

These are strictly my personal ideas and in no way purport to speak for the Convention of States Project.   That said, I fully understand that, if introduced in Convention, they would be altered or improved as needed.   At this point they are intended solely to stimulate discussion and debate.   They are as follows:

 

NUMBER ONE:

"Section One:   The Constitution of the United States shall be read and interpreted literally.   No words or phrases shall be changed or substituted and no part of the Constitution shall be used to expand or increase Federal Power or Authority beyond that EXPRESSLY granted and enumerated in the Constitution.   The language of the Constitution shall be interpreted according to the definition of words at the time of their inclusion in the Constitution.

Section Two:    Congress shall have, by two thirds vote of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, the power to override individual rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States and/or subordinate Federal Courts.   The President shall not have veto authority over Congressional overrides of Federal Court decisions."

NUMBER TWO:

"Section One:    No person shall be elected to Congress more than once unless serving in Congress at the time of the ratification of this amendment, in which case members of Congress shall be eligible for re-election to their respective seats one time.

Section Two:     In the event the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed members of the Senate of the United States shall serve at the pleasure and discretion of the Legislature of their respective State.

Section Three:  Neither Congress, the President, nor any Federal Court shall make any law, rule, regulation, or order that does not apply equally to themselves and all citizens of the United States.   Nor shall Congress, the President, or any Federal Court cause or allow any law, rule, regulation, or order to be made by any agent or agency of the Federal Government that does not apply equally to themselves and all citizens of the United States.

Section Four:    Neither Congress nor the President shall receive any publically-funded retirement or benefit beyond appropriate pay not available to all citizens of the United States.

Section Five:    Section Four shall not apply to members of Congress or Presidents, serving or retired, at the time of the ratification of this amendment.

Section Six:      The President shall be subject to popular recall by his/her constituency.   Within 90 days of the ratification of this amendment Congress shall pass legislation governing the recall of the President.   In the event Congress fails to pass the required legislation within the required 90 days, the President shall be considered to have been recalled and a new election held within 60 days.

Section Seven: Members of Congress shall be subject to popular recall by their respective constituencies, unless the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed, in which case only members of the House of Representatives shall be subject to popular recall.   Within 90 days of the ratification of this amendment each State shall pass legislation governing the recall of its Congressional Delegation.   In the event a State fails to pass the required legislation within the required 90 days, that State's Congressional Delegation shall be considered to have been recalled and new elections held within 60 days."

NUMBER THREE:

"Congress shall make and the President shall sign a Balanced Federal Budget every year and before the beginning of the ensuing fiscal year.   In the event Congress and the President fail to make said Balanced Federal Budget before the beginning of the ensuing fiscal year, the last Constitutionally passed and signed Federal Budget shall go into effect and shall be the Federal Budget for the entirety of the ensuing fiscal year.   Balanced shall be defined as expenditures not to exceed revenues except in time of war as declared by Congress.   Revenues shall be defined as monies received; not monies predicted, anticipated, or forecasted.   Unfunded liabilities, obligations, and/or mandates shall be included in the calculation of the Balanced Federal Budget."

NUMBER FOUR:

"The Fourteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States are hereby repealed.   All Federal agencies, programs, laws, rules, regulations, and/or orders created, passed, or handed down as a direct or indirect result of the Fourteenth, Sixteenth, and/or Seventeenth Amendments are hereby stricken from Law, declared null and void, and have no force of effect."

NUMBER FIVE:

"Section One:     Only persons born of two parents, both of whom are citizens of the United States at the time of the birth of the person, shall be citizens of the United States unless naturalized under the terms and conditions of the Constitution of the United States.

Section Two:      Only United States Citizens shall enjoy or receive all rights, benefits, and privileges of United States Citizenship.

Section Three:   Non-citizens shall not receive, directly or indirectly, Federal or Constitutional benefits, privileges, or protections."

NUMBER SIX:  

"The several States are hereby empowered, individually or collectively, to enforce the Constitution of the United States and Federal Law, within their respective borders, regardless of Federal resistance or objections."

NUMBER SEVEN:  

"Section One:   The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States shall be interpreted to mean the FUNDAMENTAL right of individual citizens and/or groups of citizens to keep and bear arms; in their homes and/or other properties, in public and private, and on their persons.

Section Two:    Non-citizens and persons convicted of a violent felony by a jury of their peers do not have this right."

NUMBER EIGHT:

"The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States shall not be interpreted to prohibit or restrict the peaceful, free exercise or expression of religion, in public or private, or in or on public property."

 

Thank you for taking the time to read the above.   If you have any questions feel free to make comments or suggestion.

Oren Long

Mexicans are smarter than Obama and co.

I like my idea for illegals better.  How about any illegals that are caught are put in chain gangs and made to clean up trash along the highway for a month?  If they are caught twice, they get one year in prison and three months on the chain gang, non concurrent.  A third offense illegally crossing our border will be considered an open attack on our nation, and they will be shot.  Thoughts?

$%^&*#@()*&^}{!  Enough said?

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

Florida Sheriff — “I Will Not Enforce Assault Weapons Ban, Neither Will Most Sheriffs”

Dennis Lemma, who is the Sheriff in Central Florida’s Seminole County, told a group of 2nd Amendment activists recently that he would not enforce an assault weapons ban that could soon become Florida law if the “Ban Assault Weapons Now” amendment passes in the Sunshine State.

According to News965, the ban has the following specifications.

The amendment proposed in the state legislature would ban possession of assault weapons, which are defined as “semiautomatic rifles and shotguns capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition at once, either in fixed or detachable magazine, or any other ammunition feeding device.”

Lemma, an ardent supporter of the 2nd Amendment and a first term sheriff who is running for re-election, said this about whether or not he would enforce such a law.

“It’s not only that I wouldn’t, the majority of sheriffs across the state would not do it,” Lemma said in the video. It’s up to the sheriffs what they are willing to enforce.”

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service