Beto: Americans Will Comply with My Gun Confiscation Plan


Beto O'Rourke insists Americans will comply with his gun confiscation plan

 Speaking to a reporter in New Hampshire over the weekend, Beto claimed law enforcement would not be needed to confiscate Americans’ guns because people would willingly comply with the law.

“I don’t see the law enforcement going door to door,” Beto told the Washington Examiner.

“I see Americans complying with the law.”

“I see us working with gun owners, non-gun owners, local, county, state, federal law enforcement to come up with the best possible solution,” he continued.

“I have yet to meet an owner of an AR-15 who thinks it’s OK that we have these kind of mass killings in this country.”

Dailycaller.com reports: He was also quoted as saying, “How do you — how do we enforce any law? There’s a significant reliance on people complying with the law. You know that a law is not created in a vacuum.”

 The Texas politician has repeatedly signaled his support for mandatory gun confiscation by the government.

O’Rourke confirmed his plan for mandatory confiscation last week.

“I was asked how I’d address people’s fears that we will take away their assault rifles. I want to be clear: That’s exactly what we’re going to do,” he said in a tweet.

“Americans who own AR-15s and AK-47s will have to sell their assault weapons. All of them.”

O’Rourke qualified for this week’s Democratic debate, however, he remains low in the polls. According to RealClearPolitics, he only has 2.3 percent support in the primary race for the Democratic nomination.

 The former Texas congressman has attempted to make fighting against gun violence one of his signature issues following two mass shootings in Texas this summer.

https://newspunch.com/beto-americans-comply-gun-confiscation-plan/

Views: 51

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 Come and get the guns man, or move out of America.

Beto may get more than an empty assault rifle if he attempts to violate the 2d Amendment... an armed citizen's militia was to have an equivalent firepower with the government military forces...

The purpose of the 2d Amendment is not to provide firearms to Deer Hunt... no, it's to provide sufficient firepower to the citizens of the USA to reign in a rogue government... local, state, federal or all three at once.  That means private citizens as groups or individuals are authorized by the Constitution to have any weapon the US Military ..stocks in their inventory of weapons.

The purpose of the 2d Amendment is not to provide firearms to Deer Hunt... no, it's to provide sufficient firepower to the citizens of the USA to reign out a Rogue Khazar Government...:)

Mr. Nelson went from, that comment above, to comments from the past, watch out to the tanks...:)- LMAO

What are you talking about... smoking again?  Try not to engages in smoke signals or get a better translator.

Making fun of you Ronald, if we bring it up about a civil war, you run off at the yap with do ya have tanks, fighter jets and a lot of BS, and then you make the other comment, what ever Ronald.

If one is going to seriously engage in a Civil War... it would pay for them to count the cost and weigh just how prepared they are for such a monumental undertaking.

Yep...  got that right, a long 20 to 25 years of the underground militia running terrorist attacks against the Khazar system in America...:)

 Hope ya got cash on hand...:)

If you last 90 days I'd be real surprised.

The surprise is, will they exclude you if they think the militia is in your town...:)

You can tell when Ronald is all mouth...:)

911, in Salem, MO, ...Hi is this 911...

yes how may I help you...

There is this man Ronald A. Nelson and he has a army of underground militia looks like maybe 10,000 men will heavy armory.  He thinks he is General Patton and he said they are going after Congress...

Ok thank you we will send in the jets.

So Ronald, make sure you kiss your butt goodbye..

LOL Tif

 Just a fool trying to make a impression to get elected.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker
 

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service