The national news media is joining forces with left-wing activists to try and bring down Sheriff Joe Arpaio - the most prominent national symbol in the fight against illegal immigration - by launching a effort to distort his record and harm his re-election chances 30 days from now.

And a new Super PAC to channel millions from George Soros has also been launched to defeat him. All these attacks are taking a toll, as a new shocking poll shows Sheriff Joe's opponent within 6 points of defeating him.

All while the Sheriff continues to simply do his job to enforce the law, and protect Americans by stopping drug and human smugglers from entering the U.S. The battle is on like never before - and Joe needs your help now.


ABC News has abandoned any pretense of objective jouralism, hiring an pro-illegal alien activist to create "Arpaio Watch" - an outrageous new TV news series and website whose own stated goal is to "expose" Sheriff Joe supposed "abuse of power", "racial profiling" of Latinos and "civil rights violations".

The ABC series presents just one side in its reports: those who oppose Sheriff Joe. Illegal aliens themselves are showcased, making outrageous claims of "racial profiling", despite having such claims rejected by a Federal Judge. ABC also features activists from La Raza and the ACLU - groups who have also lost in court to Arpaio, yet their claims are given new creedence, with not an ounce of journalistic "balance".

ABC would not commit such resources to going after Sheriff Joe if they did not think he could be defeated. And a new Septemeber 13th poll revealed that the effects of the leftist barrage has made this a closer race than ever: Sheriff Joe now leads his opponent by only 6 points. The opposition is within striking distance, and the entire open-borders establishment has decided to try and defeat Arpaio, and are bringing in the big guns to do it.

Those big guns will be funded by a new "Super PAC" formed in September to barrage the airwaves with ads targeting Sheriff Joe. We warned about this months ago, when leftist billionaire George Soros pledged to spend up to $10 million to defeat Joe. The Super PAC to accomplish his goal and funnel his money is now a reality, and Joe needs your help in the last month before voters go to the polls.

Sheriff Joe is the most prominent national symbol in the fight against illegal immigration. His defeat would be an unprecedented victory by open-borders activists and against the rule of law. We cannot let Joe be defeated by national pro-amnesty forces! Please help defend Sheriff Joe in his hour of need!

America cannot afford to lose Sheriff Joe. Please help Joe fight back now.

Sheriff Joe is committed to enforcing our immigration laws to protect every citizen.

 That's why he was a target for this Administration from day one. Because Arizona is the gateway for illegal aliens into America. And the open-borders forces don’t want Sheriff Joe to be the gate, stopping the flow of illegal labor – and potential voters for their cause – into this country.

“America’s Toughest Sheriff” refuses to quit doing his job of stopping illegal invaders and criminal aliens from entering this country, threatening our citizens, stealing our jobs, and bankrupting our schools, hospitals and social services.

Arpaio and his deputies apprehend a staggering 25% of all criminal illegal aliens in the entire United States every single year. That means Joe doesn’t just keep illegal alien rapists, robbers, gangbangers and identity thieves out of Arizona – he also keeps criminals from threatening your city or town, and those across America

Joe will not quit. He cannot quit. But Joe does not have the resources to battle both Obama and George Soros alone. He needs our help. He needs our help!


  Because he has led the fight in Arizona against illegal immigration, Sheriff Joe Arpaio has become the target of attack by national special interest groups and politicians who want illegal immigration in order to buy votes. All he is doing is enforcing the laws of his state and our country. These well-funded groups have vowed an unprecedented fight to defeat him for re-election.

 What these extremists really want is a Sheriff who will look the other way, be silent and allow the charade to continue, while ignoring the laws of our land. Sheriff Joe will NEVER let that happen.

 But Joe desperately needs your help. He cannot fight a billionaire like Soros, or Obama and Holder - who have unlimited funds at their disposal - by himself. He has to go directly to the people for their support. He needs good people like you in this country to stand behind him and help him fight this fight.

 Will you join us? Sheriff Joe desperately needs your help now. His election has been targeted as the frontline in the battle to end illegal immigration. We must win this battle.

Please make an emergency donation to help Sheriff Joe right away - $15, $20, $35, $50, $100, $250 or whatever you can afford.

Views: 44

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You can help Sheriff Joe out by clicking on the link if you so desire




Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service